Double-blind multiple peer reviews to change students’ reading behaviour and help them develop their writing skills

References

• Badcock, P. B. T., Pattison, P. E., & Harris, K.-L. (2010). Developing generic skills through university study: A study of arts, science and engineering in Australia. Higher Education, 60(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9308-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfour, S. P. (2013). Assessing Writing in MOOCs: automated essay scoring and calibrated peer review™. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(1), 40–48. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062843.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging Ideas (2nd ed.). Jossey Bass Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1995). What is learner self assessment? In D. Boud (Ed.), Enhancing learning through self assessment (pp. 11–23). RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer Learning and Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240405
   Google Scholar
• Burchfield, C. M., & Sappington, J. (2000). Compliance with required reading assignments. Teaching of Psychology, 27(1), 58–60. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-07173-017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, K. (2019). Where are the storytellers? A quest to (re)enchant geography through writing as method. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1554630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, E. M., & Doubet, K. J. (2016). The differentiated flipped classroom. A practical guide to digital learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin, SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891–901. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clump, M. A., Bauer, H., & Bradley, C. (2004). The extent to which psychology students read textbooks: A multiple class analysis of reading across the psychology curriculum. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(3), 227–232. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=1&sid=a362f49e-f15b-4d64-9025-f1a5e3aeca88%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=14701522&db=a9h
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. J., & Spencer, J. (1993). Using writing across the curriculum in economics: Is taking the plunge worth it? The Journal of Economic Education, 24(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1993.10844794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLyser, D. (2010). Writing qualitative geography. In D. DeLyser, S. Herbert, S. Aitken, M. Crang, & L. McDowell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative geography (1st ed., pp. 341–358). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O., & Engelsen, K. S. (2011). Portfolio practices in higher education in Norway in an international perspective: Macro‐, meso‐ and micro‐level influences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903197891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, T. (2009). The ‘write’ skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctoral students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(2), 285–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260902734968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment Matters in Higher Education (pp. 41–53). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (2006). Why assessment is changing. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 11–22). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 2(1), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Alao, S. (1997). Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gynnild, V. (2003). Når eksamen endrer karakter. Evaluering for læring i høyere utdanning. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hanjani, A. M., & Li, L. (2014). Exploring L2 writers’ collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance. System, 44, 101–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, T., Wald, N., & Randhawa, H. (2017). Student peer review: Enhancing formative feedback with a rebuttal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5), 801–811. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1194368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J., & West, H. (2020). Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeft, M. E. (2012). Why university students don’t read: What professors can do to increase compliance. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060212
   Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D., McCune, V., Hounsell, J., & Litjens, J. (2008). The Quality of Guidance and Feedback to Students. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, S. A., Bartlett, K. A., Gorney, S. E., & Herschbach, T. R. (2010). Resistance to reading compliance among college students: Instructors’ perspectives. College Student Journal, 44(2), 219–229. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=ca074327-c105-4869-ae94-150387d40569%40pdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=51362157&db=a9h
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. (2017). The role of anonymity in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 645–656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1174766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T., & Turner, J. (2001). Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510020029608
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A. (2007). Best practice in teaching evaluation and revision. In S. Graham, C. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practice in writing instruction (pp. 141–162). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Mui, A. B., Nelson, S., Huang, B., He, Y., & Wilson, K. (2015). Development of a web-enabled learning platform for geospatial laboratories: Improving the undergraduate learning experience. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(3), 356–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1039503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, R., Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Pearce, J. (2014). How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(6), 657–677. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.860421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder, R., & Pearce, J. M. (2007). PRAZE: Innovating teaching through online peer review. ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007, Singapore. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mulder.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2001). The student experience of criterion-referenced assessment (through the introduction of a common criteria assessment grid). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/147032901300002873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olin Library Reference. (2018). How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography: The Annotated Bibliography. Cornell University Library. http://guides.library.cornell.edu/c.php?g=32342&p=203789.
   Google Scholar
• Papinczak, T., Young, L., & Groves, M. (2007). Peer assessment in problem-based learning: A qualitative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purchase, H., & Hamer, J. (2018). Peer-review in practice: Eight years of Aropä. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1146–1165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1435776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T. E. (2006). Motivating novice students to read their textbooks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(2), 136–140. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=55bf0dac-0006-4e30-a147-4747dcc49cd6%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=106160368&db=a9h
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, J. & Cohen, R. (2001). Designing peer learning. In BoudD., CohenR., & Sampson J. (Eds.), Strategies for peer learning: some examples (pp 35–49). Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. (2008). Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00255.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. L. (1982). Learning strategies of mature college learners. Journal of Reading, 26(1), 5–12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40029209
   Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, H., & Mulder, R. A. (2012). Collaborative learning through formative peer review: Pedagogy, programs and potential. Computer Science Education, 22(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2012.728041
   Google Scholar
• Taffs, K. H., & Holt, J. I. (2013). Investigating student use and value of e-learning resources to develop academic writing within the discipline of environmental science. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(4), 500–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2013.801012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, -C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2009). The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: The role of scientific epistemological views. [journal article]. Instructional Science, 37(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind, D. K., Jørgensen, R. M., & Hansen, S. L. (2018, 5-6 July). Peer Feedback with Peergrade. ICEL 2018-13th International Conference on e-Learning, The Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, U., & Tribble, C. (2012). The best of both worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic Literacies writing pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.525630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar