Students’ comparison competencies in geography: results from an explorative assessment study

References

• Becker-Mrotzek, M., Kämper van den Boogart, M., Köster, J., Stanat, P., & Gippner, G. (2015). Bildungsstandards aktuell: Deutsch in der Sekundarstufe II. Braunschweig: Diesterweg.
   Google Scholar
• Budke, A., Gebele, D., Königs, P., Schwerdtfeger, S., & Zepter, L. A. (2021). Materialgestütztes argumentierendes Schreiben im Geographieunterricht von Schüler*innen mit und ohne besonderem Förderbedarf. In A. Budke & F. Schäbitz (Eds.), Argumentieren und Vergleichen. Beiträge aus der Perspektive verschiedener Fachdidaktiken (Vol. 15, pp. 173–199). LIT.
   Google Scholar
• Budke, A., & Kuckuck, M. (2017). Argumentation mit Karten. In H. Jahnke, A. Schlottmann, & M. Dickel (Eds.), Räume visualisieren (Vol. 62, pp. 91–102). Münsterscher Verlag für Wissenschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Budke, A., Schiefele, U., & Uhlenwinkel, A. (2010). ’I think it’s stupid’is no argument: Investigating how students argue in writing‬. Teaching Geography, 35(2), 66–69.‬‬‬‬‬‬.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K. R., & Evenhuis, E. (2020). Theorising in urban and regional studies: Negotiating generalisation and particularity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsaa036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de l’Education Nationale, M. (2019, January 22). Programme d’histoire-géographie de seconde générale et technologique: Arrêté du 17-1-2019. Bulletin Officiel de l’Education Nationale Spécial, (1), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geographie. (2017). Bildungsstandards im Fach Geographie für den Mittleren Schulabschluss mit Aufgabenbeispielen. Bonn: Selbstverlag DGfG, 96.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/SICI1098-237X20000584:3287:AID-SCE13.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1967). Les Règles de la méthode sociologique (16th ed.). PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children’s developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, H. M., & Anthony, L. M. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 337–372. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028002337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Fear, K. L., & Anderson, L. M. (1988). Students’ metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(1), 18–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. The American Psychologist, 52(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.1.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstone, R. L., Day, S., & Son, J. Y. (2010). Comparison. In B. Glatzeder, V. Goel, & A. Müller (Eds.), Towards a theory of thinking: Building blocks for a conceptual framework (pp. 103–121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03129-8_7
   Google Scholar
• Hammann, L. A., & Stevens, R. J. (2003). Instructional approaches to improving students’ writing of compare-contrast essays: An experimental study. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(2), 731–756. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3502_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, P., & Savitch, H. V. (2005). How to study comparative urban development politics: A research note. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00575.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R. T. (1987). Writing performance: Effects of cognitive strategies. Written Communication, 4(3), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088387004003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, L. C., & Klein, P. D. (2009). Planning text structure as a way to improve students’ writing from sources in the compare–contrast genre. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krehl, A., & Weck, S. (2020). Doing comparative case study research in urban and regional studies: What can be learnt from practice? European Planning Studies, 28(9), 1858–1876. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1699909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological science, 22(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611402512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, R., & Bourke, T. (2019). Assessment in geography education: A systematic review. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1385348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namy, L. L., & Gentner, D. (2002). Making a silk purse out of two sow’s ears: Young children’s use of comparison in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oluwatayo, J. A. (2012). Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(2), 391–400.
   Google Scholar
• Paniagua, M., Swygert, K., & Downing, S. (2019). Written Tests: Writing high-Quality Constructed-Response and Selected-Response Items. In R. Yudlowsky, Y. S. Park, & S. M. Downing (Eds.), Assessment in Health Professions Education (2nd ed., pp. 109–125). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138054394
   Google Scholar
• Piovani, J. I., & Krawczyk, N. (2017). Comparative studies: Historical, epistemological and methodological notes. Educação & Realidade, 42(3), 821–840. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623667609
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2011). Cities in a world of cities: The comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2022). Introduction: Generating concepts of ‘the urban’ through comparative practice. Urban Studies, 59(8), 1521–1535. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221092561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roid, G. H. (2006). Designing ability tests. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (2nd ed., pp. 527–542). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2009). The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory. Regional studies, 43(6), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701809665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M., & Budke, A. (2020). How geography textbook tasks promote comparison competency—An international analysis. Sustainability, 12(20), 8344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, M., Budke, A., & Schäbitz, F. (2020). The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: Results of an international comparative analysis. Heliyon, 6(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey, N. N. (1991). The shaping of meaning: Options in writing the comparison. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(4), 390–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlenwinkel, A. (2015). Geographisches Wissen und geographische Argumentation. In A. Budke, M. Kuckuck, M. Meyer, F. Schäbitz, K. Schlüter, & G. Weiss (Eds.), Fachlich argumentieren. Didaktische Forschungen zur Argumentation in den Unterrichtsfächern (Vol. 7, pp. 46–61).
   Google Scholar
• Van der Stuyf, R. R. (2002). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy. Adolescent Learning and Development, 52(3), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In L. S. Vygotsky & M. Cole (Eds.), Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes (pp. 79–91). Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1921). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie (Vol. 3). Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcke, H., & Budke, A. (2019). Comparison as a method for geography education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology, Psychiatry, & Applied Disciplines, 17, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar