E‐assessment by design: using multiple‐choice tests to good effect

References

• Airasian , P. W. 1994 . Classroom assessment (2nd edn) , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Arthur , N. 2006 . Using student‐generated assessment items to enhance teamwork, feedback and the learning process . Synergy: Supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at the University of Sydney , 24 : 21 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Banks , D. A. 2006 . Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases , London : Information Science Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Bloom , B. S. 1956 . Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals , London : Longmans .
   Google Scholar
• Boud , D. 2000 . Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society . Studies in Continuing Education , 22 (2) : 151 – 167 .
   Google Scholar
• Boyle , J. T. and Nicol , D. J. 2003 . Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings . Association for Learning Technology Journal , 11 (3) : 43 – 57 .
   Google Scholar
• Brew , A. 1999 . “ Self and peer assessment in context ” . In Assessment matters in higher education: choosing and using diverse assessment , Edited by: Brown , S and Glasner , A . 159 – 171 . Buckingham : Open University Press/SRHE .
   Google Scholar
• Bull , J. and Danson , M. 2004 . Computer assisted assessment (CAA) , York : Learning and Teaching Support Network .
   Google Scholar
• Bull , J. and McKenna , C. 2004 . Blueprint for computer‐assisted assessment , London : RoutledgeFalmer .
   Google Scholar
• Cox , K. R. 1976 . How did you guess? Or what do multiple choice questions measure? . Medical Journal of Australia , 1 : 884 – 886 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellenz , M. 2004 . Using assessment to support higher level learning: the multiple choice item development assignment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 29 (6) : 703 – 719 .
   Google Scholar
• Gardner‐Medwin , A. R. 2006 . “ Confidence‐based marking: towards deeper learning and better exams ” . In Innovative assessment in higher education , Edited by: Bryan , C and Clegg , K . London : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Higgins , R. , Hartley , P. and Skelton , A. 2001 . Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback . Teaching in Higher Education , 6 (2) : 269 – 274 .
   Google Scholar
• Honey , M. and Marshall , D. The impact of on‐line multi‐choice questions on undergraduate student nurses' learning . paper presented at ASCILITE 2003: 20th Annual Conference ‐ Interact, Integrate, Impact, Adelaide, 7–10 December
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone , A. H. and Ambusaidi , A. 2000 . Fixed response: what are we testing? . Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe , 1 (3) : 323 – 328 .
   Google Scholar
• Mazur , E. 1997 . Peer instruction: a user's manual , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Nicol , D. Increasing success in first year courses: assessment re‐design, self‐regulation and learning technologies . paper presented at the ASCILITE Conference, Sydney, 3–6 December
   Google Scholar
• Nicol , D. J. and Boyle , J. T. 2003 . Peer instruction versus class‐wide discussion in large classes: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom . Studies in Higher Education , 28 (4) : 457 – 473 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol , D. J. and Macfarlane‐Dick , D. 2006 . Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice . Studies in Higher Education , 31 (2) : 198 – 218 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol , D. J. and Milligan , C. 2006 . “ Rethinking technology‐supported assessment in terms of the seven principles of good feedback practice ” . In Innovative assessment in higher education , Edited by: Bryan , C and Clegg , K . London : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Novak , G. M. , Patterson , E. T. , Gavrin , A. D. and Christian , W. 1999 . Just‐in‐time‐teaching: blending active learning with web technology , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Paris , S. G. and Turner , J. C. 1994 . “ Situated motivation ” . In Student motivation, cognition and learning , Edited by: Pintrich , P. R , Brown , D. R and Weinstein , C. E . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Rust , C. , Price , M. and O'Donovan , B. 2003 . Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 28 (2) : 147 – 164 .
   Google Scholar
• Scouller , K. 1998 . The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay . Higher Education , 35 : 453 – 472 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke , M. 2003 . Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice . Higher Education , 45 (4) : 477 – 501 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakrzewski , S. and Bull , J. 1999 . The mass implementation and evaluation of computer‐based assessments . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 23 (2) : 141 – 152 .
   Google Scholar