From theoretical language to the interstices of daily practice: Reducing competency stripping through transformative teaching and learning

References

• Adams, M., L. A. Bell, and P. Griffin. 2007. Teaching for diversity and social justice. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M., W. J. Blumenfeld, R. Castañeda, H. W. Hackman, M. L. Peters, and Z. Zúñiga. 2000. Readings for diversity and social justice. An anthology on racism, antisemitism, sexism, heterosexism, ableism, and classism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• American College Personnel Association & National Association for Student Personnel Administrators. 2004. Learning reconsidered: A campus-wide focus on the student experience. Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association & National Association for Student Personnel Administrators.
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Colleges and Universities. 2002. Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. 1999. “Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education.” Journal of College Student Development 4(5): 518–529.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, H. S., and C. Leland. 1991. Women of influence, women of vision: A cross-generational study of leaders and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. 2002. “Preparing the next generation of faculty.” Journal of Higher Education 73(1): 94–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badran, M. 2009. Feminism in Islam: Secular and religious convergences. Oxford: Oneworld.
   Google Scholar
• Baez, B., and D. Boyles. 2009. The politics of inquiry: Education research and the ‘culture of science’. New York: SUNY Albany University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behar, R. 2003. “Response: Sad movies make me cry.” In Chicana feminisms: A critical reader, edited by G. F. Arredondo, A. Hurtado, N. Klahn, O. Nájera-Ramírez and P. Zavella, 109–113. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. 1993. The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berzon, B. 1996. Setting them straight: You can do something about bigotry and homophobia in your life. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, W. J., and D. Raymond. 2000. “Prejudice and discrimination.” In Readings for diversity and social justice, edited by M. Adams, W. J. Blumenfeld, R. Castañeda, H. W. Hackman, M. L. Peters and X. Zúňiga, 21–30. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1998. Acts of resistance. Against the tyranny of the market. New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broido, E. M., and K. Manning. 2002. “Philosophical foundations and current theoretical perspectives in qualitative research.” Journal of College Student Development 43(4): 434–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. 1993. “Breaking the code: Engaging practitioners in critical analysis of adult educational literature.” Studies in the Education of Adults 25(1): 64–91.
   Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. 2001. “Renewing the civic mission of the American research university.” The Journal of Higher Education 72: 125–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. 2004. “Dilemmas of civic renewal.” In Public work and the academy: An academic administrator’s guide to civic engagement and service-learning, edited by M. Langseth and W. M. Plater, 211–226. Bolton: Anker Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Collings, P. H. 2000a. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of Empowerment. 2.th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collings, P. H. 2000b. “Coming to voice, coming to power: Black feminist thought as critical social theory.” In Women in higher education: A feminist perspective, edited by J. Glazer-Raymo, B. K. Townsend and B. Ropers-Huilman, 34–52. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. 2002. “The first decade: Critical reflections, or ‘a foot in the closing door’.” In Crossroads, directions and a new critical race theory, edited by F. Valdes, J. M. Culp and A. P. Harris, 9–31. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. 1998. The Angela Y. Davis reader. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dews, C. L., and C. L. Law. 1995. This fine place so far from home: Voices of academics from the working class. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, G., and G. Kamberelis. 2006. Theory for education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M., E. Tuck, and S. Z. Berkman. 2006. Do you believe in Geneva? Participatory action research, critical methods and Indigenous knowledges. Keynote address at the Congress of Qualitative Inquiry. Illinois, USA: Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1976. The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Gildersleeve, E. R., A. M. Kuntz, P. A. Pasque, and R. Carducci. 2010. “The role of critical inquiry in (re)constructing the public agenda for higher education: Confronting the conservative modernization of the academy.” The Review of Higher Education 34(1): 85–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A., and S. S. Giroux. 2004. Take back higher education: Race, youth, and the crisis of democracy in the post-civil rights era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haberman, M. 2000. “Urban schools: Day cams or custodial centers?” Phi Delta Kappan 82(3): 234–240.
   Google Scholar
• Hellawell, D. 2006. “Inside-out: Analysis of the insider-outsider concept as a heuristic device to develop reflexivity in students doing qualitative research.” Teaching in Higher Education 11(4): 483–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M. 2001. “Internalized homophobia among gay men, lesbians, and bisexuals.” In Readings for diversity and social justice, edited by M. Adams, W. J. Blumenfeld, H. W. Hackman, M. L. Peters and X. Zúñiga, 276–281. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. 2000. Where we stand: Class matters. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, G. C., and M. K. Hogg. 2004. “Teaching and learning about qualitative research in the social sciences: An experiential learning approach amongst marketing students.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 28(4): 307–320.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado, S. 2007. “Linking diversity with the educational and civic missions of higher education.” The Review of Higher Education 30(2): 185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irigaray, L. 1974. Speculum of the other woman. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, B. 2002. Discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. R., V. Torres, and J. Arminio. 2006. Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurfiss, J. G. 1988. Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities. College Station, TX: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 2003. “Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place.” In Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief, edited by Y. S. Lincoln and N. K. Denzin, 85–215. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, C. 2004. “Fantastic self: A study of adolescents’ fictional narratives, and aesthetic activity as identity work.” In Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society, edited by C. Daiute and C. Lightfoot, 21–37. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Merseth, K. K. 1997. Case studies in educational administration. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. 2000. “Dante’s left foot kicks queer theory into gear.” In Thinking Queer, edited by S. Talburt and S. Steinberg, 15–32. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. J. 2004. Liberating scholarly writing: The power of personal narrative. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 1999. Sex & social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasque, P. A., S. Franklin, and S. Luke. 2004. “Leadership and empowerment: Working to make change.” In Engaging the whole of service-learning, diversity, and learning communities, edited by J. Galura, P. A. Pasque, D. Schoem and J. Howard. Ann Arbor: OCSL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L., E. A. St, and Pierre. 2005. “Writing: A method of inquiry.” In The Sage handbook of qualitative inquiry. 3rd ed, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 959–978. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., and S. F. Rallis. 2003. Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. 2.th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salzman, P. C. 2002. “On reflexivity.” American Anthropologist 104(3): 805–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, R. P. 2009. Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction. 3.th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, C. A. 1999. Democracy, education and multiculturalism: Dilemmas of citizenship in a global world. MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Yosso, T. J. 2005. “Whose culture has capital?: A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth.” Race, Ethnicity, and Education 8(1): 69–91.
   Google Scholar