Exploring the use of learner-focused teaching approaches in different academic disciplines

References

• Åkerlind, G. S. 2007. “Constraints on academics’ potential for developing as a teacher.” Studies in Higher Education 32(1): 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. 2000. “University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity.” Higher Education 40(4): 409–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassey, M. 1999. Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., and P. R. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. 2nd ed. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. 1973. “The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.” Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. 1966. “The scree test for the number of factors.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 1: 245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K.-W., J. Tan, and A. Khoo. 2007. “Pre-service teachers’ conceptions about teaching and learning: A closer look at Singapore cultural context.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 35(2): 181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., M. Perlwitz, and D. Underwood-Gregg. 1998. “Individual construction, mathematical acculturation, and the classroom community.” In Constructivism and education, edited by M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz and J. Garrison, 63–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. 1993. “What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and application.” Journal of Applied Psychology 78(1): 98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B., and D. Sumara. 2002. “Constructivist discourses and the field of education: Problems and possibilities.” Educational Theory 52(4): 409–428.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2005. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fosnot, C.T., ed. 2005. Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and M. Coffey. 2004. “The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students.” Active Learning in Higher Education 5(1): 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. 2003. “Factor analysis.” In Handbook of psychology, edited by J. A. Schinka and W. F. Velicer, 143–164. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hativa, N. 2002. “Becoming a better teacher: a case of changing the pedagogical knowledge and beliefs of law professors.” In Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education, edited by N. Hativa and P. Goodyear, 289–319. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Holt-Reynolds, D. 2000. “What does the teacher do? Constructivist pedagogies and prospective teachers’ beliefs about the role of a teacher.” Teaching and Teacher Education 16: 21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, K. R., and J. Berv. 2000. “Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical.” In Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues, edited by D. C. Phillips, 19–40. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., and E. Calhoun. 1998. “The conduct of inquiry on teaching: The search for models more effective than recitation.” In International handbook of educational change, edited by A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan and D. Hopkins, 1216–1241. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, R., S. Sandretto, and C. Heath. 2002. “Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics.” Review of Educational Research 72(2): 177–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. 1997. “A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching.” Learning and Instruction 7(3): 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., and K.-P. Kwan. 2002. “Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching.” In Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education, edited by N. Hativa and P. Goodyear, 219–239. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, S. 2008. “Teachers’ meanings: Transcending the cultural context.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 32(3): 251–262.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S., K. Trigwell, A. Nevgi, and P. Ashwin. 2006. “How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context.” Studies in Higher Education 31(3): 285–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueddeke, G. R. 2003. “Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and ‘teaching-scholarship’.” Studies in Higher Education 28(2): 213–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A., P. Freebody, L. Shun, and S. Gopinathan. 2005. “Towards research-based innovation and reform: Singapore schooling in transition.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 25(1): 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E., M. Prosser, K. Trigwell, P. Ramsden, and J. Benjamin. 2002. “What university teachers teach and how they teach it.” In Teacher thinking, beliefs and knowledge in higher education, edited by N. Hativa and P. Goodyear, 103–126. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., C. Weston, D. Berthiaume, and G. Fairbank-Roch. 2006. “How do instructors explain their thinking when planning and teaching?” Higher Education 51: 125–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. H. F., and M. G. Eley. 2006. “The Approaches to Teaching Inventory: A critique of its development and applicability.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 633–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, K., and R. MacDonald. 1997. “The disjunction between lecturers’ conceptions of teaching and their claimed educational practice.” Higher Education 33: 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R., S. Parry, and T. Becher. 2002. “Teaching and learning in their disciplinary context: A conceptual analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 4: 405–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, L., J. T. E. Richardson, J. Hartley, S. Newstead, and J. Mayes. 2005. “Teachers’ beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education.” Higher Education 50: 537–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B. P. 2000. “SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 32(3): 396–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips, D. C. 2000. “An opinionated account of the constructivist landscape.” In Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues, edited by D. C. Phillips, 1–18. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postareff, L., S. Lindblom-Ylänne, and A. Nevgi. 2007. “The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23: 557–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, D. D., and Associates. 1998. Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., and K. Trigwell. 1993. “Development of an Approaches to Teaching questionnaire.” Research and Development in Higher Education 15: 468–473.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., and K. Trigwell. 1997. “Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 25–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., and K. Trigwell. 1999. Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., and K. Trigwell. 2006. “Confirmatory factor analysis of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 76: 405–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. 1997. “Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice.” In Constructivist teacher education: Building new understandings, edited by V. Richardson, 3–14. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. 2003. “Constructivist pedagogy.” Teachers College Record 105(9): 1623–1640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. 1949. The concept of mind. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelowicz, K., and J. D. Bain. 2001. “Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning.” Higher Education 41: 299–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching.” Educational Researcher 15(2): 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Ministry of Education. 2002. Junior College/Upper Secondary Education Review Report. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Ministry of Education. 2006. Education Statistics Digest. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, K. 1993. “Constructivist perspectives on teacher learning.” In The practice of constructivism in science education, edited by K. Tobin, 215–226. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K. 2002. “Approaches to teaching design subjects: A quantitative analysis.” Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 1(2): 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser. 2004. “Development and use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory.” Educational Psychology Review 16(4): 409–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., M. Prosser, and P. Ginns. 2005. “Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised Approaches to Teaching Inventory.” Higher Education Research & Development 24(4): 349–360.
   Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. 1989. “Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching.” Synthese 80(1): 121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. 2001. Radical constructivism and teaching. Originally published in French as ‘Constructivisme radical et enseignement’ in Perspectives 31. no. 2: 191–204, 2001, http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/244.2 (accessed November 15, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. 2002. “Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers.” Review of Educational Research 72(2): 131–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar