Situating power potentials and dynamics of learners and tutors within self-assessment models

References

• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliams. 2003. Assessment for Learning. Putting it into Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment.” PHI Delta Kappan 80 (2): 139–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2005. “Lessons from around the World: How Policies, Politics and Cultures Constrain and Afford Assessment Practices.” The Curriculum Journal 16 (2): 249–261.10.1080/09585170500136218
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1995. Enhancing Learning through Self Assessment. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, H., and J. Cowan. 1985. “A Case for Self-assessment Based on Recent Studies of Student Learning.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 10 (3): 225–235.10.1080/0260293850100304
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, H. R., A. Adeyemi-Bero, and R. F. Blackhall. 1985. Acquiring Professional Competence through Learner-directed Learning – an Undergraduate Perspective. Occasional Paper 7. Edinburgh: Royal Society of Arts, in Education for capability.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, A. C., and L. J. Stefani. 1995. “Analysis of Peer, Self- and Staff-assessment in Group Project Work.” Assessment in Education 2 (2): 165–185.10.1080/0969594950020204
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. 2002. Plus/minus Marking: A Method of Assessment worth Considering? York: The Higher Education Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. 2006. On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher: Reflection in Action. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1994. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press/Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1968. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1971. Selection from the Prison Notebooks. Q. Hoare and G. Norwell-Smith. edited and translated by. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, J. M. 1995. “Foucalt’s Poststructuralism and Observational Education Research: A Study of Power Relations.” In After Postmodernism: Education, Politics and Identity, edited by R. Smith and P. Wexler, 98–111. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, J. 1988. “Assessment Revisited.” In Developing Student Autonomy in Learning, edited by D. J. Boud, 77–90. London: Kogan.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. 1987. Women. Fire and Dangerous Things – What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Merry, S., M. Price, D. Carless, and M. Taras, eds. 2013. Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, T. 1999. “Using Negotiation in Summative Assessment to Encourage Critical Thinking.” Teaching in Higher Education 4 (4): 549–554.10.1080/1356251990040410
   Google Scholar
• Mouzelis, N. 1995. Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., and K. Trehan. 2000. “Assessment: A Critical Perspective.” Studies in Higher Education 25 (3): 267–278.10.1080/03075070050193406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18: 145–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somervell, H. 1993. “Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education: The Case for Self, Peer and Collaborative Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 18(3): 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Stronach, I. 1996. “Fashioning Post-modernism, Finishing Modernism: Tales from the Fitting Room.” British Educational Research Journal 22 (3): 359–375.10.1080/0141192960220308
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, M., K. Atkinson, and D. Atkinson. 2003. Language and Power in the Modern World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. K. 2004. “Does Student Self-assessment Empower or Discipline Students?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 651–662.10.1080/0260293042000227209
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2001. “The Use of Tutor Feedback and Student Self-assessment in Summative Assessment Tasks: Towards Transparency for Students and for Tutors.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (6): 606–614.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2003. “To Feedback or Not to Feedback in Student Self-assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (5): 549–565.10.1080/02602930301678
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2008. “Issues of Power and Equity in Two Models of Self Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 81–92.10.1080/13562510701794076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2010. “Student Self-assessment: Processes and Consequences.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (2): 199–213.10.1080/13562511003620027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2013. “Feedback on Feedback: Uncrossing Wires across Sectors.” In Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education, edited by S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless and M. Taras, 30–40. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., and C. Robinson. 2009. “Student Voice: Theorising Power and Participation.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 17 (2): 161–175.10.1080/14681360902934392
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2003. Making Sense of Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. 2013. “Surveys of ‘the Student Experience’ and the Politics of Feedback.” In Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education, edited by S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless, and M. Taras, 6–18. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar