‘I’m just not that comfortable with technology’: student perceptions of and preferences for Web 2.0 technologies in reflective journals

References

• Barnes, K., R. C. Marateo, and S. P. Ferris. 2007. “Teaching and Learning with the Net Generation.” Innovate 3 (4). Accessed May 16, 2013. http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=382
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., A. Bishop, B. Dalgarno, J. Waycott, and G. Kennedy. 2012. “Implementing Web 2.0 Technologies in Higher Education: A Collective Case Study.” Computers and Education 59: 524–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., and C. Tang. 2007. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longmans-Green.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2001. Using Journal Writing to Enhance Reflective Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 90: 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, C. 1994. “An Analysis of Self-initiated Coping Behaviour: Diary-keeping.” Child Study Journal 24 (3): 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, C., L. J. Harris, K. Smith, and L. Warren. 2009. “Privacy and Integrity in the Virtual Campus.” In Proceedings of Network Ethics: The New Challenge in Business, ICT and Education Conference, Track 3: Higher Education and Virtual Learning: Ethical Issues and Perspectives, Lisbon, Portugal, 23–25 June.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso, J. B., and R. B. Kvavik. 2005. ECAR Study of Students and Information Technology, 2005: Convenience, Connection, Control, and Learning. Washington, DC: Educause Center for Applied Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, Y., and Y. Hsu. 2011. “Design-grounded Assessment: A Framework and a Case Study of Web 2.0 Practices in Higher Education.” Special Issue 5: 781–797.
   Google Scholar
• Colley, B. M., A. R. Bilics, and C. M. Lerch. 2012. “Reflection: A Key Component to Thinking Critically.” Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3 (1). http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol3/iss1/2
   Google Scholar
• Connor-Greene, P. A. 2000. “Making Connections: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Journal Writing in Enhancing Student Learning.” Teaching of Psychology 27 (1): 44–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole, G. and P. Alevizou. 2010. A Literature Review of the Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Higher Education. Report for the Higher Education Academy. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/EvidenceNet/Conole_Alevizou_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, D., and M. Harvey. 2013. “Scaffolding Student Reflection for Experience-based Learning: A Framework.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (4): 401–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crème, P. 2005. “Should Student Learning Journals be Assessed?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 303: 287–296.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. W. 2008. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1933. How We Think. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Dohn, N. B. 2009. “Web 2.0: Inherent Tensions and Evident Challenges for Education.” Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4: 343–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyment, J. E., and T. S. O’Connell. 2010. “The Quality of Reflection in Student Journals: A Review of Limiting and Enabling Factors.” Innovative Higher Education 35: 233–244.
   Google Scholar
• Dyment, J. E., and T. S. O’Connell. 2011. “Assessing the Quality of Reflection in Student Journals: A Review of the Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (1): 81–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, S. 2008. “The Value of Reflective Journaling in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 45 (9): 1379–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, T. and M. van Harmelen. 2007. Web 2.0 for Content for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. JISC Report. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/digitalrepositories/Web2-content-learning-and-teaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ghaye, T. 2011. Teaching and Learning through Reflective Practice: A Practical Guide for Positive Action. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleaves, A., C. Walker, and J. Grey. 2008. “Using Digital and Paper Diaries for Assessment and Learning Purposes in Higher Education: A Case of Critical Reflection or Constrained Compliance?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (3): 219–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, K., C. Thompson, J. Sheard, R. Clerehan, and M. Hamilton. 2010. “Students as Web 2.0 Authors: Implications for Assessment Design and Conduct.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26 (1): 105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L., L. Warren, J. Leah, and M. Ashleigh. 2010. “Small Steps Across the Chasm: Ideas for Embedding a Culture of Open Education in the University Sector.” In Education 16 (1). http://ineducation.ca/index.php/ineducation/article/view/47/510
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, A. 2002. Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatton, N., and D. Smith. 1995. “Reflection in Teacher Education: Towards Definition and Implementation.” Teaching and Teacher Education 11 (1): 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, L.E. 2000. “Educating the Net Generation.” Social Administrator 57 (54): 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmi, A., S. Bayne, and R. Landt. 2009. “The Appropriation and Repurposing of Social Technologies in Higher Education.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 25: 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hourigan, T., and L. Murray. 2010. “Using Blogs to Help Language Students to Develop Reflective Learning Strategies: Towards a Pedagogical Framework.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26, (2): 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. 2001. “Beliefs about Knowledge and the Process of Teaching and Learning as a Factor in Adjusting to Study in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 26 (2): 205–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., B. Dalgarno, K. Gray, T. Judd, J. Waycott, S. Bennett, K. Maton, K. L. Krause, A. Bishop, R. Chang, and A. Churchward. 2007. “The Net Generation are not Big Users of Web 2.0 Technologies: Preliminary Findings.” ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings ASCILITE Singapore 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/kennedy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Killeavy, M., and A. Moloney. 2010. “Reflection in a Social Space: Can Blogging Support Reflective Practice for Beginning teachers?” Teaching and Teacher Education 26: 1070–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., and L. Price. 2008. “Assessment and Student Learning: A Fundamental Relationship and the Role of Information and Communication Technologies.” Open Learning 23 (1): 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, D. 2009. “The Impact of Student Employment.” Inside Higher Ed. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/06/08/work
   Google Scholar
• Mair, C. 2011. “Using Technology for Enhancing Reflective Writing, Metacognition and Learning.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 36 (2): 147–167.
   Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., A. Littlejohn, and G. Vojt. 2011. “Are Digital Natives a Myth or Reality? University Students’ Use of Digital Technologies.” Computers & Education 56: 429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. and R. Säljö. 2005. Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, and N. Entwistle, eds. The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education, 3rd Internet edn. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment. http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/institute-academic-development/learning-teaching/staff/advice/researching/publications/experience-of-learning
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCrindle, M. 2006. New Generations at Work: Attracting, Recruiting, Retraining and Training Generation Y. Sydney, NSW: McCrindle Research.
   Google Scholar
• Merizow, J. & Associates. 1990. Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Minott, M.A. 2008. “Valli’s Typology of Reflection and the Analysis of Pre-service Teachers’ Reflective Journals.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 33 (5): 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R. 2013. “American University Students Work too Much: At Jobs, not School.” The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/14/american-college-students-work-too-much
   Google Scholar
• Naismith, L., B. Lee, and R. M. Pilkington. 2011. Collaborative Learning with a Wiki: Differences in Perceived Usefulness in Two Contexts of Use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (2): 228–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, W. 2012. Can We Teach Digital Natives Digital Literacy? Computers & Education 59: 1065–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. and J. Oblinger. 2005. Is it Age or IT: First Steps Toward Understanding the Net Generation. In D. Oblinger and J. Oblinger, eds. Educating the Net Generation. http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen/
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, T. S., and J. E. Dyment. 2011. The Case of Reflective Journals: Is the Jury Still Out?Reflective Practice 12 (1): 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, Z. 2004. The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. 2005. What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, K. A., and S. Kajder. 2010. “Eliciting and Assessing Reflective Practice: A Case Study in Web 2.0 Technologies.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 22 (2): 218–228.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2001. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001. Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon 9 (5): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2007. How to Teach with Technology: Keeping Both Teachers and Students Comfortable in an Era of Exponential Change. Emerging Technologies for Learning 2: 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sankey, M. and H. Huijser. 2009. A ‘Likely Benefit’ from Aligning Web 2.0 Technologies with an Institutional Learning and Teaching Agenda. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education, E-Learn 2009, Vancouver, Canada, 26–30 October. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/6055/
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, I. 1992. Empowering Education: Critical Teaching for Social Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sim, J. W. S., and K. F. Hew. 2010. “The Use of Weblogs in Higher Education Settings: A Review of Empirical Research.” Educational Research Review 5: 151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. 2011. “Teaching Critical Reflection.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (2): 211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strampel, K. E. and R. G. Oliver. 2008. We’ve thrown away the pens, but are they learning? Using blogs in higher education. Proceedings of ASCILITE. Melbourne, VI: ASCILITE, 992–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. 2013. The Digital Natives as Learners: Technology use Patterns and Approaches to Learning. Computers & Education 65: 12–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, K. 2004. “Reflective Learning Journals: From Concept to Practice.” Reflective Practice 5 (3): 327–343.
   Google Scholar
• Travers, M. 2010. “Qualitative Interviewing Methods.” In Social Research Methods, edited by M. Walter, 287–319. South Melbourne, VI: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valli, L. 1997. “Listening to Other Voices: A Description of Teacher Reflection in the United States.” Peabody Journal of Education 72 (1): 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. S., and J. S. Oliver. 2003. “Journaling during a School-based Secondary Methods Course: Exploring a Route to Teacher Reflection.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 14 (3): 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, F. K. Y., D. Kember, L. Y. F. Chung, and L. Yan. 1995. “Assessing Levels of Reflection from Reflective Journals.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 22: 48–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., and P. Sharma. 2011. “Exploring Evidence of Reflective Thinking in Student Artifacts of Blogging-mapping Tool: A Design-based Research Approach.” Instructional Science 39: 695–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar