Discipline context shapes meaningful teaching: a case study of academic law

References

• Ashwin, Paul. 2012. Analysing Teaching-Learning Interactions in Higher Education: Accounting for Structure and Agency. Continuum Studies in Education. London: Continuum International Pub. Group.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, Tony. 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Berthiaume, Denis. 2009. “Teaching in the Disciplines.” In A Handbook for Teaching and Learning for Higher Education, edited by Heather Fry, Steve Ketteridge, and Stephanie Marshall, 215–255. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, Anthony. 1973. “Relationships between Subject Matter Characteristics and the Structure and Output of University Departments.” Journal of Applied Psychology 57 (3): 204. doi:10.1037/h0034699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bligh, Donald A. 2000. What’s the use of Lectures?. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, Richard E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Burton R. 1987. The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds. A Carnegie Foundation Special Report. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Cownie, Fiona. 2004. Legal Academics: Culture and Identities. 1st ed. Oxford & Portland: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cownie, Fiona. 2012. “Law, Research, and the Academy.” In Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century. Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education. 1st ed., edited by Paul Trowler, Murray Saunders, and Veronica Bamber, 55–77. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, Janet. 2002. Learning to Think: Disciplinary Perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Fanghanel, Joëlle. 2009. “The Role of Ideology in Shaping Academics’ Conceptions of their Discipline.” Teaching in Higher Education 14 (5): 565–577.10.1080/13562510903186790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, Martha S. 1995. Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data. Qualitative Research Methods; 33. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781412986007
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, Jennifer, and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 80–92.10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John. 2008. Case Study Research : Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Handal, Gunnar. 1999. “Consultation using Critical Friends.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1999 (79): 59–70.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0768
   Google Scholar
• Healey, Mick, and Allan Jenkins. 2003. “Disicpline-Based Educational Development.” In The Scholarship of Academic Development, edited by Heather Eggins and Ranald Macdonald, 47–57. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Willis A. 2011. “Variation among Academic Disciplines: An Update on Analytical Frameworks and Research.” The Journal of the Professoriate 6 (1): 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, Ruth, Susan Sandretto, and Chris Heath. 2002. “Telling Half the Story: A Critical Review of Research on the Teaching Beliefs and Practices of University Academics.” Review of Educational Research 72 (2): 177–228.10.3102/00346543072002177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, Peter T., and Paul R. Trowler. 2000. “Department-Level Cultures and the Improvement of Learning and Teaching.” Studies in Higher Education 25 (1): 69–83.10.1080/030750700116028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Zoltán. 2017. “Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. 1st ed., edited by Elena Semino and Zsófia Demjén, 13–27. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 2015. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 4th ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, Steinar. 1997. Interview: En Introduktion Til Det Kvalitative Forskningsinterview [Interviews]. Kbh.: Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, Sari, Keith Trigwell, Anne Nevgi, and Paul Ashwin. 2006. “How Approaches to Teaching are Affected by Discipline and Teaching Context.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 285–298.10.1080/03075070600680539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueddeke, George R. 2003. “Professionalising Teaching Practice in Higher Education: A Study of Disciplinary Variation and ‘Teaching-Scholarship’.” Studies in Higher Education 28 (2): 213–228.10.1080/0307507032000058082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Elaine, Michael Prosser, Keith Trigwell, Paul Ramsden, and Joan Benjamin. 2000. “What University Teachers Teach and how they Teach it.” Instructional Science 28: 387–412.10.1023/A:1026559912774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, Velda, and Dai Hounsell. 2005. “The Development of Students’ Ways of Thinking and Practicing in Three Final-Year Biology Courses.” Higher Education 49: 255–289.10.1007/s10734-004-6666-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, Ruth. 2001. “Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching.” Studies in Higher Education 26 (2): 135–146.10.1080/03075070120052071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, Ruth, Sharon Parry, and Tony Becher. 2002. “Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A Conceptual Analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (4): 405–417.10.1080/0307507022000011525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, Lin, John T. E. Richardson, James Hartley, Stephen Newstead, and Jenny Mayes. 2005. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Intentions Concerning Teaching in Higher Education.” Higher Education 50: 537–571.10.1007/s10734-004-6363-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser, Michael, and Keith Trigwell. 1997. “Relations between Perceptions of the Teaching Environment and Approaches to Teaching.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 67: 25–35.10.1111/bjep.1997.67.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan, Kathleen M. 1999. “Commonalities and Controversy in Context: A Study of Academic Historians’ Educational Beliefs.” Teaching and Teacher Education 15 (4): 447–463.10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00066-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxå, Torgny, and Katarina Mårtensson. 2013. “How Effects from Teacher-Training of Academic Teachers Propogate into the Meso Level and Beyond.” In Teacher Development in Higher Education. Existing Programs, Program Impact, and Future Trends, edited by E. Simon and G. Pleschova, 213–233. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 2005. “Signature Pedagogies in the Professions.” Daedalus 134: 52–59.10.1162/0011526054622015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeby, Jens-Christian. 1996. “Disciplinary Differences in University Teaching.” Studies in Higher Education 21 (1): 69–79.10.1080/03075079612331381467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigwell, Keith, Michael Prosser, and Fiona Waterhouse. 1999. “Relations between Teachers’ Approaches to Teaching and Students’ Approaches to Learning.” Higher Education 37 (1): 57–70.10.1023/A:1003548313194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, Paul. 2008. Cultures and Change in Higher Education. Theories and Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-0-230-36511-7
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, Paul. 2009. “Beyond Epistemological Essentialism. Academic Tribes in the Twenty-First Century.” In The University and its Disciplines. 1st ed., edited by Carolin Kreber, 181–195. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, Paul. 2012. “Disciplines and Interdisciplinarity: Conceptual Groundwork.” In Academic Tribes and Territories in the 21st Century. Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education. 1th ed., edited by Paul Trowler, Murray Saunders, and Veronica Bamber, 5–29. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trowler, Paul. 2014. “Depicting and Researching Disciplines: Strong and Moderate Essentialist Approaches.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (10): 1720–1731. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.801431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, Elisabeth, and Matthias Nückles. 2015. “Knowledge Acquisition Or Participation in Communities of Practice? Academics’ Metaphors of Teaching and Learning at the University.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (4): 624–643.10.1080/03075079.2013.842213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelmsen, Lars Skjold. 2014. Juridisk Fagdidaktikk: Med Vekt på Studentenes Læring [Didactics of Academic Law: Emphasising Student Learning]. Bergen: Fagbokforl.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2012. Applications of Case Study Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar