The importance of clarity in written assessment instructions

References

• Barber, J., J. Puryer, L. McNally, and D. O’Sullivan. 2015. “The Contents of Dental Implant Patient Information Leaflets Available within the UK.” British Dental Journal 218 (4): E7–E7. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, C., and C. Lawson. 2017. “The Problem of Student Attrition in Higher Education: An Alternative Perspective.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 41 (6): 773–784. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D. U., and O. Wasilik. 2009. “Factors Influencing Faculty Satisfaction with Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.” Distance Education 30 (1): 103–116. doi:10.1080/01587910902845949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. 2004. “Assessment for Learning.” Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, no. 1. http://www2.glos.ac.uk/offload/tli/lets/lathe/issue1/articles/brown.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cenere, P., R. Gill, C. Lawson, and M. Lewis. 2015. Communication Skills for Business Professionals. Port Melbourne, VIC: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M., and T. L. Liau. 1975. “A Computer Readability Formula Designed for Machine Scoring.” Journal of Applied Psychology 60 (2): 283–284. doi:10.1037/h0076540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBay, W. H. 2004. The Principles of Readability. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490073.
   Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. 1948. “A New Readability Yardstick.” Journal of Applied Psychology 32 (3): 221–233. doi:10.1037/h0057532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, I., and A. Prigat. 2005. “Why Organizations Continue to Create Patient Information Leaflets with Readability and Usability Problems: An Exploratory Study.” Health Education Research 20 (4): 485–493. doi:10.1093/her/cyh009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, T., and S. Hodge. 2014. “Just Imaginary: Delimiting Social Inclusion in Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 35 (5): 688–709. doi:10.1080/01425692.2014.919841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunning, R. 1969. “The Fog Index after Twenty Years.” Journal of Business Communication 6 (2): 3–13. doi:10.1177/002194366900600202.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J. 2008. Academic Writing and Publishing: A Practical Guide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R., and M. Turoff. 2005. “Education Goes Digital: The Evolution of Online Learning and the Revolution in Higher Education.” Communicable ACM 48 (10): 59–64. doi:10.1145/1089107.1089139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplante-Lévesque, A., K. J. Brännström, G. Andersson, and T. Lunner. 2012. “Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Adults with Hearing Impairment and Their Significant Others.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (8): 618–626. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.684406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger, E., S. Moran, and T. Rodden. 2013. ‘Consent for All: Revealing the Hidden Complexity of Terms and Conditions’. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2687–2696. CHI ’13. New York, NY, USA, ACM. doi:10.1145/2470654.2481371.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. 2016. “The Worldwide Trend to High Participation Higher Education: Dynamics of Social Stratification in Inclusive Systems.” Higher Education 72 (4): 413–434. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, G. H. 1969. “SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula.” Journal of Reading 12 (8): 639–646.
   Google Scholar
• Miltsakaki, E., and A. Troutt. 2008. ‘Real-Time Web Text Classification and Analysis of Reading Difficulty’. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 89–97. Columbus: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Barbora_Hladka/publication/234789206_An_annotated_corpus_outside_its_original_context_a_corpus-based_exercise_book/links/0c96052396f58c36bd000000.pdf#page=99.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. E. 1997. “A Descriptive Study of the Readability of Patient Information Leaflets Designed by Nurses.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 26 (5): 985–991. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00455.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. OECD Skills Outlook 2013 Report Country Note for Australia. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris. http://www.oecd.org/site/piaac/Country note - Australia_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Paudyal, P. 2015. “Readability, Presentation and Quality of Allergy-Related Patient Information Leaflets: A Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Allergy & Therapy 06: 03. doi:10.4172/2155-6121.1000213.
   Google Scholar
• Race, P. 2007. The Lecturer’s Toolkit: A Practical Guide to Assessment, Learning and Teaching. 3rd ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, J. L., and W. A. Nicewander. 1988. “Thirteen Ways to Look at the Correlation Coefficient.” The American Statistician 42 (1): 59–66. doi:10.1080/00031305.1988.10475524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiner, L. A. 2009. Linking Student Satisfaction and Retention. Coralville, Iowa: Noel-Levitz Inc. https://www.ruffalonl.com/documents/shared/Papers_and_Research/2009/LinkingStudentSatis0809.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smidt, E., L. Rui, J. Bunk, T. Kochem, and M. Ashley. 2017. “The Meaning of Quality in an Online Course to Administrators, Faculty, and Students.” Journal of Interactive Learning Research 28 (1): 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. G., D. Ferguson, and M. Caris. 2001. “Online Vs Face-to-Face.” T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education) 28 (9): 18.
   Google Scholar
• Štajner, S., R. Evans, C. Orăsan, and R. Mitkov. 2012. ‘What Can Readability Measures Really Tell Us about Text Complexity’. In Proceedings of Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Improving Textual Accessibility, 14–22. Istanbul, Turkey: Citeseer. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.353.9628&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=19.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L., and J. Hill. 2007. “A Conceptual Model for Understanding Self-Directed Learning in Online Environments.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6 (1): 27–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, P.-C., R. J. Tsai, G. Finger, Y.-Y. Chen, and D. Yeh. 2008. “What Drives a Successful E-Learning? an Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction.” Computers & Education 50 (4): 1183–1202. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, G. L. 2008. “A Text Readability Continuum for Postsecondary Readiness.” Journal of Advanced Academics 19 (4): 602–632. doi:10.4219/jaa-2008-832.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, D., and D. Janan. 2013. “Exploring the Readability of Assessment Tasks: The Influence of Text and Reader Factors.” REMIE Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research 3 (1): 69.
   Google Scholar