Using attainment curves and lead-times to help improve student examination performance

References

• Ashworth, M., S. Bloxham, and L. Pearce. 2010. “Examining the Tension between Academic Standards and Inclusion for Disabled Students: The Impact on Marking of Individual Academics’ Frameworks for Assessment.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (2): 209–223. doi:10.1080/03075070903062864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asikainen, H., T. Hailikari, and M. Mattsson. 2018. “The Interplay between Academic Emotions, Psychological Flexibility and Self-regulation as Predictors of academic Achievement.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 42 (4): 439–453. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2017.1281889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, E. J., D. H. Saklofske, and S. M. Mastoras. 2010. “Emotional Intelligence, Coping and Exam‐related Stress in Canadian Undergraduate Students.” Australian Journal of Psychology 62 (1): 42–50. doi:10.1080/00049530903312899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and P. Boyd. 2007. Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education. Maidenhead: OU Press/McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and A. West. 2004. “Understanding the Rules of the Game: Marking Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 721–733. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227254.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2000. “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22 (2): 151–167. doi:10.1080/713695728.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2007. “Reframing Assessment as if Learning Was Important.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term, edited by D. Boud and N. Falchikov, 14–25. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 2014. “Shifting Views of Assessment: From Secret Teachers’ Business to Sustaining Learning.” In Advances and Innovations in University Assessment and Feedback, edited by C. Kreber, C. Anderson, N. Entwistle, and J. McArthur, 13–31. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and N. Falchikov. 2007a. “Introduction. Assessment for the Longer Term.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education, edited by D. Boud and N. Falchikov, 3–13. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and N. Falchikov. 2007b. Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. A., J. Bull, and M. Pendlebury. 2013. Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. 2019. “Using Assessment and Feedback to Empower Students and Enhance Their Learning.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. A Handbook for Academic Practitioners, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 50–63. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, C., and K. Klegg. 2019. Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. 2015. Student Fury over ‘impossible’ Economics Exam. London: BBC. Accessed 21 November 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-31057005
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., and Z. F. Gamson. 1987. “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.” AAHE Bulletin 39 (7): 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell, S. 2012. The Exam Skills Handbook. 2nd ed., Palgrave Study Skills. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C., H. Gross, and R. Dymott. 2006. “Assessment Relationships in Higher Education: The Tension of Process and Practice.” British Educational Research Journal 32 (1): 95–114. doi:10.1080/01411920500402037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. 2015. “Assessment Rubrics: Towards Clearer and More Replicable Design, Research and Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 347–360. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, K. L., and K. L. S. Neumeister. 2012. “Research on Perfectionism and Achievement Motivation: Implications for Gifted Students.” Psychology in the Schools 49 (7): 668–677. doi:10.1002/pits.v49.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. 2019. “How Assessment Frames Student Learning.” In Innovative Aassessment in Higher Education. A Handbook for Academic Practitioners, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 22–35. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, S., and J. Crabb. 2016. Study Skills for Students with Dyslexia: Support for Specific Learning Differences (SpLDs). 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D. B. 2007. “Using Concept Maps to Measure Deep, Surface and Non‐learning Outcomes.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (1): 39–57. doi:10.1080/03075070601099432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huba, M. E., and J. E. Freed. 2000. Learner Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• JCQ. 2019. Report of the Independent Commission on Examination Malpractice (Dunford Report). London: Joint Council for Qualifications. Accessed 21 November 2019. https://www.jcq.org.uk/examination-system/imc-home/report-of-the-independent-commission-on-examination-malpractice
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• King, H. 2019. “Stepping Back to Move Forward. The Wider Context of Assessment in Higher Education.” In Innovative Aassessment in Higher Education. A Handbook for Academic Practitioners, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 9–21. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 2007. “Contradictions of Assessment for Learning in Institutions of Higher learning.” In Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education, edited by D. Boud and N. Falchikov, 57–71. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, L. 2019. “Innovative Assessment. The Academic’s Perspective.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education: A Handbook for Academic Practitioners, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 111–120. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. 1998. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ofqual. 2019. Access Arrangements for GCSE, AS and A Level, 2018 to 2019 Academic Year, Ofqual/19/6563/1. Coventry, UK: Ofqual. Accessed 22 November 2019. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/847495/Access_Arrangements_for_GCSE_AS_and_A_level_2018_to_2019_academic_year.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Öhrstedt, M., and P. Lindfors. 2019. “First-semester Students’ Capacity to Predict Acdemic Achievement as Related to Approaches to Learning.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 43 (10): 1420–1432. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2018.1490950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, G. 2006. Evidence Based Teaching. A Practical Guide. London: Nelson Thornes.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C. 2007. “Towards a Scholarship of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (2): 229–237. doi:10.1080/02602930600805192.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C., M. Price, and B. O’Donovan. 2003. “Improving Students’ Learning by Developing Their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (2): 146–164. doi:10.1080/02602930301671.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2005. “Interpretations of Criteria Based Assessment and Grading in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (2): 175–194. doi:10.1080/0260293042000264262.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009. “Indeterminacy in the Use of Preset Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 159–179. doi:10.1080/02602930801956059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambell, K., L. McDowell, and C. Montgomery. 2012. Assessment for Learning in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. 1997. Thinking Styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stowell, M. 2004. “Equity, Justice and Standards: Assessment Decision Making in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (4): 495–510. doi:10.1080/02602930310001689055.
   Google Scholar
• Taras, M. 2001. “The Use of Tutor Feedback and Student Self-Assessment in Summative assessment Tasks: Towards Transparency for Students and for Tutors.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (6): 605–614. doi:10.1080/02602930120093922.
   Google Scholar
• Whalley, B., D. France, J. Park, A. Mauchline, and K. Welsh. 2020. “Developing Active Personal Learning Environments on Smart Mobile Devices.” In Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2019, edited by K. Arai, R. Bhatia, and S. Kapoor, 871–889. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Whalley, W. B. 2015. “Evaluating Student Assessments: The Use of Optimal Foraging Theory.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 183–198. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.991909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley, W. B. 2019. “Towards Institutional ‘quality Education’ Policies in Higher Education: A Schema for Their Implementation.” Quality in Higher Education 25: 340–358. doi:10.1080/13538322.2019.1684041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P., J. Wray, H. Farrall, and J. Aspland. 2014. “Fit for Purpose: Traditional Assessment Is Failing Undergraduates with Learning Difficulties. Might eAssessment Help?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 18 (6): 614–625. doi:10.1080/13603116.2013.802029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar