Postgraduate researchers’ experiences of accessing participants via gatekeepers: ‘wading through treacle!’

References

• Aaltonen, S., and A. Kivijärvi. 2019. “Disrupting Professional Practices with Research-driven Intervention. Researcher–gatekeeper Negotiations in the Context of Targeted Youth Services.” Qualitative Social Work 18 (4): 621–637. doi:10.1177/1473325018757080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern, K. 2014. “Gatekeepers: People Who Can (And Do) Stop Your Research in Its Tracks.” Gatekeepers: People Who Can (And Do) Stop Your Research in Its Tracks. doi:10.4135/978144627305014536673.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen, D., M. Msoroka, and B. Findsen. 2017. “‘It’s a Case of Access.’ The Problematics of Accessing Research Participants.” Waikato Journal of Education 22 (4): 4–18. doi:10.15663/wje.v22i4.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. A., J. Baker, N. A. Spassiani, and B. A. Meisner. 2012. “Gatekeepers of Gerontological Research: A Pilot Study Investigating Factors Influencing Research Compliance.” Research on Aging 34 (5): 499–506. doi:10.1177/0164027512444290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and D. Walker. 1998. “Promoting Reflection in Professional Courses: The Challenge of Context.” Studies in Higher Education 23 (2): 191. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken-Roche, D., E. Bell, M. E. Macdonald, and E. Racine. 2017. “The Concept of “Vulnerability” in Research Ethics: An In-depth Analysis of Policies and Guidelines.” Health Research Policy and Systems 15 (1): 8. doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, edited by H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher, 57–71. American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13620-004.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. 1995. Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. Jossey-Bass. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1281793.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, H., and J. Dyson. 2005. “Action Research in Higher Education: Exploring Ways of Creating and Holding the Space for Reflection.” Educational Action Research 13 (2): 291–300. doi:10.1080/09650790500200280.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, E., and C. Griffiths. 2017. “Recruitment and Consent of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities in a Classic Grounded Theory Research Study: Ethical and Methodological Considerations.” Disability & Society 32 (2): 193. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1281793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, M. K., and O. Lund. 2016. “Doctoral Education in a Successful Ecological Niche: A Qualitative Exploratory Case Study of the Relationship between the Microclimate and Doctoral Students’ Learning to Become a Researcher.” International Journal of Higher Education 3 (3): 103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. 2011. “Gaining and Maintaining Access: Exploring the Mechanisms that Support and Challenge the Relationship between Gatekeepers and Researchers.” Qualitative Social Work 10 (4): 485–502. doi:10.1177/1473325009358228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collings, S., R. Grace, and G. Llewellyn. 2016. “Negotiating with Gatekeepers in Research with Disadvantaged Children: A Case Study of Children of Mothers with Intellectual Disability.” Children & Society 30 (6): 499. doi:10.1111/chso.12163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, E., T. Bachkirova, and D. Clutterbuck. 2010. The Complete Handbook of Coaching. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• D’Cruz, H., P. Gillingham, and S. Melendez. 2007. “Reflexivity, Its Meanings and Relevance for Social Work: A Critical Review of the Literature.” British Journal of Social Work 37 (1): 73–90. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcl001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, K., and K. H. Hunter. 2017. “PhD Student Emotional Exhaustion: The Role of Supportive Supervision and Self-Presentation Behaviours.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (4): 335–344. doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1174143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devos, C., G. Boudrenghien, N. Van der Linden, A. Azzi, M. Frenay, B. Galand, and O. Klein. 2016. “Doctoral Students’ Experiences Leading to Completion or Attrition: A Matter of Sense, Progress and Distress.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 32 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1007/s10212-016-0290-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyregrov, K. 2004. “Bereaved Parents’ Experience of Research Participation.” Social Science and Medicine 58 (2): 391–400. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00205-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmioglu, E., L. McAlpine, and C. Amundsen. 2017. “Doctoral Students’ Experiences of Feeling (Or Not) like an Academic.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 12: 73–90. doi:10.28945/3727.
   Google Scholar
• Ewis, J. O. L. 2020. “Research Note Identifying New Gatekeepers in Social Media Networks.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Studies 51: 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Fakirani, A. (2009). “Meta-Reflection: Reflecting on Reflection.” [University of London]. http://www.alimfakirani.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Fakirani-Alim-Meta-Reflection-FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J., and F. Gardner. 2007. Practising Critical Reflection: A Resource Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Francis Cain, T., and D. E. Trussell. 2019. “Methodological Challenges in Sport and Leisure Research with Youth from Refugee Backgrounds.” World Leisure Journal 61 (4): 303–312. doi:10.1080/16078055.2019.1661106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galica, J., K. Bilodeau, F. Strohschein, T. L. Powell, L. K. Lambert, and T. L. O. Truant. 2018. “Building and Sustaining a Postgraduate Student Network: The Experience of Oncology Nurses in Canada.” Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal 28 (4): 288. doi:10.5737/23688076284288293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• George, J. 2000. “Emotions and Leadership: The Role of Emotional Intelligence.” Human Relations 53 (8): 1027–1055. doi:10.1177/0018726700538001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germain, A., S. Green, S. Pieniak, and J. Gladman. 2016. “The Bromhead Care Home Service: The Impact of a Service for Care Home Residents with Dementia on Hospital Admission and Dying in Preferred Place of Care.” Clinical Medicine 16 (2): 114.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P., and P. Burnard. 2008. “The Student-supervisor Relationship in the PhD/doctoral Process.” British Journal of Nursing 17 (10): 668–671. doi:10.12968/bjon.2008.17.10.29484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, D. E. 2007. “Facilitating Management Learning: Developing Critical Reflection Through Reflective Tools.” Management Learning 38 (5): 495–517. doi:10.1177/1350507607083204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., D. Coulson, and A. McMaugh. 2016. “Towards a Theory of the Ecology of Reflection: Reflective Practice for Experiential Learning in Higher Education.” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 13 (2): 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, T. 2002. “A Quantitative Analysis of PhD Students’ Views of Supervision.” Higher Education Research and Development 21 (1): 37–41. doi:10.1080/0729436022012464.
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, J. 1997. “A Complex Craft: United Kingdom PhD Supervision in the Social Sciences.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 2 (1): 45–70. doi:10.1080/13596749700200004.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. 2012. “Spotlight on Critical Reflection.” https://www.trainingjournal.com/articles/feature/spotlight-critical-reflection.
   Google Scholar
• Høyland, S., J. G. Hollund, and O. E. Olsen. 2015. “Gaining Access to a Research Site and Participants in Medical and Nursing Research: A Synthesis of Accounts.” Medical Education 49 (2): 224. doi:10.1111/medu.12622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johl, S. K., and S. Renganathan. 2010. “Strategies for Gaining Access in Doing Fieldwork: Reflection of Two Researchers.” Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 8 (1): 42.
   Google Scholar
• Kalina, M., and D. Scott. 2019. “‘You Have to Say Everything Is Nice Here’: Complexities of Gatekeeping in Qualitative Research in Northern Mozambique.” Qualitative Research Journal 19 (3): 307–323. doi:10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kars, M. C., G. J. M. W. van Thiel, R. van der Graaf, M. Moors, A. de Graeff, and J. J. M. van Delden. 2016. “A Systematic Review of Reasons for Gatekeeping in Palliative Care Research.” Palliative Medicine 30 (6): 533. doi:10.1177/0269216315616759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keilman, L., M. C. Parkes, and H. Prigerson. 2014. “Bereavement: Studies of Grief in Adult Life.” Anthropology & Aging 35 (1): 64–66. doi:10.5195/AA.2014.41.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, K., B. Clark, V. Brown, and J. Sitzia. 2003. “Good Practice in the Conduct and Reporting of Survey Research.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 15 (3): 261–266. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy-Macfoy, M. 2013. “‘It’s Important for the Students to Meet Someone like You.’ How Perceptions of the Researcher Can Affect Gaining Access, Building Rapport and Securing Cooperation in School-based Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice 16 (6): 491–502. doi:10.1080/13645579.2013.823294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lally, E. 2012. “The PhD Research Journey Is Not for the Faint-hearted.” Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand 18 (7): 18–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lange, M. M., W. Rogers, and S. Dodds. 2013. “Vulnerability in Research Ethics: A Way Forward.” Bioethics 27 (6): 333–340. doi:10.1111/bioe.12032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavrakas, P. 2008. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. doi:10.4135/9781412963947NV.
   Google Scholar
• Levecque, K., F. Anseel, A. De Beuckelaer, J. Van der Heyden, and L. Gisle. 2017. “Work Organization and Mental Health Problems in PhD Students.” Research Policy 46 (4): 868–879. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewinski, A. A., T. Mann, D. Flores, A. Vance, J. P. Bettger, and R. Hirschey. 2017. “Partnership for Development: A Peer Mentorship Model for PhD Students.” Journal of Professional Nursing 33 (5): 363–369. doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, G. A. B., R. Shankland, P. Haag, R. Fiault, and B. Juniper. 2018. “A Survey and A Positive Psychology Intervention on French PHD Student Well-being.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 13: 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Marland, A., and A. L. Esselment. 2019. “Negotiating with Gatekeepers to Get Interviews with Politicians: Qualitative Research Recruitment in a Digital Media Environment.” Qualitative Research 19 (6): 685–702. doi:10.1177/1468794118803022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T. 2014. “Reflective Practice and Professional Development. ERIC Digest.” Educational Psychology in Practice 1–7. doi:10.1080/02667363.2013.854986.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. E., C. A. Kidney, S. L. Nelms, M. R. Parker, A. Kimmel, and C. B. Keys. 2009. “Including Adults with Intellectual Disabilities in Research: Scientists’ Perceptions of Risks and Protections.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 6 (4): 244–252. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2009.00225.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., K. Kelly, and N. Spawls. 2013. “Getting past the Gatekeeper: Safeguarding and Access Issues in Researching HIV+ Children in Jamaica.” Policy Futures in Education 11 (2): 167–174. doi:10.2304/pfie.2013.11.2.167.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, A. N. 1966. Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. Oxford: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Peluso, D. L., R. N. Carleton, and G. J. G. Asmundson. 2011. “Depression Symptoms in Canadian Psychology Graduate Students: Do Research Productivity, Funding, and the Academic Advisory Relationship Play a Role?” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement 43 (2): 119. doi:10.1037/a0022624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, E., D. S. Pugh, and C. Johnson. 2015. How to Get A PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors. 6th ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pyhältö, K., A. Toom, J. Stubb, and K. Lonka. 2012. “Challenges of Becoming A Scholar: A Study of Doctoral Students’ Problems and Well-being.” ISrn Education 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, D. B. 2015. “Effectively Managing Our Expectations.” Journal of Financial Service Professionals 69 (3): 48–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ries, N. M., E. Mansfield, and R. Sanson-Fisher. 2020. “Ethical and Legal Aspects of Research Involving Older People with Cognitive Impairment: A Survey of Dementia Researchers in Australia.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 68 (December2019): 101534. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, O. C. 2014. “Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 11 (1): 25–41. doi:10.1080/14780887.2013.801543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodham, K., and J. Gavin. 2006. “The Ethics of Using the Internet to Collect Qualitative Research Data.” Research Ethics Review 2 (3): 92–97. doi:10.1177/174701610600200303.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, D., and C. Achermann. 2019. “Negotiating Research in the Shadow of Migration Control: Access, Knowledge and Cognitive Authority.” Social Anthropology 27 (S1): 49–67. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Service, B. 2012. “Keeping the Faith: How Reflective Practice Can Turn Emotional Turmoil into a Positive Outcome in the Context of Doctoral Study.” Reflective Practice 13 (2): 169–182. doi:10.1080/14623943.2011.626029.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2013. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., and D. R. Wassenaar. 2016. “Contextualising the Role of the Gatekeeper in Social Science Research.” South African Journal of Bioethics & Law 9 (1): 42. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.2016.v9i1.465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. 2011. “Teaching Critical Reflection.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (2): 211–223. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.515022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, B. 2015. “Critical Reflection as Doctoral Education.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2015 (147): 15. doi:10.1002/ace.20138.
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E. 2010. “Undertaking the Journey Together: Peer Learning for a Successful and Enjoyable PhD Experience.” Journal of University Teaching Learning Practice 7 (1): Article 8.
   Google Scholar
• Stroebe, M., W. Stroebe, and R. Hansson. 1993. Handbook of Bereavement: Theory, Research, and Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stubb, J., K. Pyhältö, and K. Lonka. 2011. “Balancing between Inspiration and Exhaustion: PhD Students’ Experienced Socio-psychological Well-being.” Studies in Continuing Education 33 (1): 33–50. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Teijlingen, E., and V. Hundley. 2001. “The Importance of Pilot Studies.” Social Research Update, University of Surrey 35: 33–36. doi:10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, J., F. Poland, and G. Charlesworth. 2019. “Facilitators and Barriers to Co-research by People with Dementia and Academic Researchers: Findings from a Qualitative Study.” Health Expectations 22 (4): 761–771. doi:10.1111/hex.12891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanat, C. L. 2008. “Getting past the Gatekeepers: Differences between Access and Cooperation in Public School Research.” Field Methods 20 (2): 191–208. doi:10.1177/1525822X07313811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, C., J. Hardy, and D. A. Rosielle. 2008. “Progress in Palliative Care Gatekeeping from Palliative Care Research Trials Online Resources in Palliative Care.” Progress In Palliative Care 16 (4): 167–171. doi:10.1179/096992608X346189.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2020. “‘It All Sounds Very Interesting, but We’re Just Too Busy!’: Exploring Why ‘Gatekeepers’ Decline Access to Potential Research Participants with Learning Disabilities.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 35 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/08856257.2019.1687563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar