Formation, negotiation, and alignment of doctoral student and supervisors’ expectations: a co-constructed narrative

References

• Adams, Tony, Stacy Linn Holman Jones, and Carolyn Ellis. 2015. Autoethnography. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adrian-Taylor, S. R., K. A. Noels, and K. Tischler. 2007. “Conflict Between International Graduate Students and Faculty Supervisors: Toward Effective Conflict Prevention and Management Strategies.” Journal of Studies in International Education 11 (1): 90–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306286313.
   Google Scholar
• Baydarova, I. 2022. “The Impact of Neoliberal Education on the Alignment of Student–Supervisor Expectations in Malaysia.” Higher Education Research & Development 42 (3): 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2096575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baydarova, I., H. E. Collins, and I. Ait Saadi. 2021. “Alignment of Doctoral Student and Supervisor Expectations in Malaysia.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 16:001–029. https://doi.org/10.28945/4682.
   Google Scholar
• Bengsten, S. S. E., D. L. Elliot, K. Guccione, and S. Kobayashi. 2020. The Hidden Curriculum in Doctoral Education. London: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Bochner, A. P., and C. Ellis. 1992. “Personal Narrative as a Social Approach to Interpersonal Communication.” Communication Theory 2:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00036.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bochner, A. P., and C. Ellis. 1995. “Telling and Living: Narrative Co-Construction and the Practice of Interpersonal Relationships. In Communication as Social Construction: Social Approaches to the Study of Interpersonal Interactions, edited by Leeds-Hurwitz Wendy, 201–213. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardilini, A. P. A., A. Risely, and M. F. Richardson. 2022. ”Supervising the PhD: identifying common mismatches in expectations between candidate and supervisor to improve research training outcomes.” Higher Education Research & Development 41(3): 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1874887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S., D. Laurs, L. Chant, and E. Wolfgramm-Foliaki. 2018. “Indigenous Knowledges and Supervision: Changing the Lens.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 55 (3): 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1403941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisco, J. 2020. “Exploring the Connection Between Impostor Phenomenon and Postgraduate Students Feeling Academically Unprepared.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (2): 200–214. 10.1080/07294.360.2019.1676198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clance, P. R. 1985. The Impostor Phenomenon: Overcoming the Fear That Haunts Your Success. Atlanta, GA: Peachtree.
   Google Scholar
• Clance, P. R., and S. A. Imes. 1978. “The Imposter Phenomenon in High Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention.” Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice 15 (3): 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. D., and W. R. McConnell. 2019. “Fear of Fraudulence: Graduate School Program Environments and the Impostor Phenomenon.” The Sociological Quarterly 60 (3): 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2019.1580552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock ,S., M. Birnbaum, K. Rodriguez, C. Cobb, and S. Zeeh. 2011. ”Doctoral Students and the Impostor Phenomenon: Am I Smart Enough to Be Here?” Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice 48 (4): 429–442. 10.2202/1949-6605.6321
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. 2004. The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel About Autoethnography. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., and L. Berger. 2001. “Composing Autoethnographic Stories.” In Doing Cultural Anthropology: Projects for Ethnographic Data Collection, edited by Michael Angrosino, 151–166. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J. C., and C. Katz. 1985. If I’m so Successful Why Do I Feel Like a Fake: The Impostor Phenomenon. 1st ed. New York: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helfer, F., and S. Drew. 2019. “Students’ Perceptions of Doctoral Supervision: A Study in an Engineering Program in Australia.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 14:499–524. https://doi.org/10.28945/4368.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, A., K. Shaw, J. Scevak, S. Bourke, R. Cantwell, and J. Budd. 2014. “PhD Candidate Expectations: Exploring Mismatch with Experience.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 9:329–346. https://doi.org/10.28945/2078.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., and C. Seale. 2007. ”Managing criticism in Ph.D. supervision: a qualitative case study.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (4): 511–526. 10.1080/03075070701476225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaysian Qualification Agency. 2017. Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF). 2nd ed. Cyberjaya. https://www.mqa.gov.my/pv4/document/mqf/2019/Oct/updated%20MQF%20Ed%202%2024102019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Masek, A. 2017, May 6-7. “Establishing Supervisor-students’ Relationships Through Mutual Expectation: A Study from supervisors’ Point of View.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Melaka. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012200.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, A. 2021. ”Adapting to the Transitional Stage of the Doctoral Environment: An Autoethnography of Socialization.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 16: 071–087. 10.28945/4685
   Google Scholar
• Moxham, L., T. Dwyer, and K. Reid-Searl. 2013. “Articulating Expectations for PhD Candidature Upon Commencement: Ensuring Supervisor/Student “Best fit.”.” Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management 35 (4): 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.812030.
   Google Scholar
• Nori, H., and M. Vinttaja. 2022. “Too Stupid for PhD? Doctoral Impostor Syndrome Among Finnish PhD Students.” Higher Education Ahead-Of-The-Print 86 (3): 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00921-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellana, M. L., A. Darder, A. Pérez, and J. Salinas. 2016. “Improving Doctoral Success by Matching PhD Students with Supervisors.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 11:87–103. https://doi.org/10.28945/3404.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, M., and C. Kayrooz. 2004. “Enabling Critical Reflection on Research Supervisory Practice.” International Journal for Academic Development 9 (1): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000296107.
   Google Scholar
• Roach, A., B. K. Christensen, and E. Rieger. 2019. “The Essential Ingredients of Research Supervision: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 111 (7): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., and V. Kumar. 2020. “Encouraging Dialogue in Doctoral Supervision: The Development of the Feedback Expectation Tool.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 15:265–284. https://doi.org/10.28945/4568.
   Google Scholar
• Suhaimi, A. T. 2013. What It Takes to GOT. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. [PowerPoint slides], https://sps.utm.my/mdps/2016/03/16/program-got-u/.
   Google Scholar
• Wijers, G. 2013. ”Dialogical education in a time of globalization: expansion, localization, and connection.” International Journal for Dialogical Science 7 (1):129–135. http://ijds.lemoyne.edu/journal/7_1/pdf/IJDS.7.1.11.Wijers.pdf
   Google Scholar