Self-managed Supervision

References

• Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW). (2010). Code of ethics. Canberra: Australian Association of Social Workers.
   Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in “the risk society”. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1279–1296. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L. (2012). External supervision in social work: Power, space, risk, and the search for safety. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 197–213. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2011.591187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, H., Kulkarni, S., & Dalton, L. (2003). Organizational prevention of vicarious trauma. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 84(4), 463–470. doi: 10.1606/1044-3894.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, S. A., & Chyung, S. Y. (2008). Factors that influence informal learning in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20(4), 229–244. doi: 10.1108/13665620810871097
   Google Scholar
• Bogo, M., & Dill, K. (2008). Walking the tightrope: Using power and authority in child welfare supervision. Child Welfare, 87(6), 141–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Middleton, H. (2003). Learning from others at work: Communities of practice and informal learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(5), 194–202. doi: 10.1108/13665620310483895
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, G. (2008). The induction of newly appointed social workers: Some implications for social work educators. Social Work Education, 27(4), 349–365. doi: 10.1080/02615470701380170
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, G., Engelbrecht, L., & Hojer, S. (2010). Supervision: A force for change? Three stories told. International Social Work, 53(6), 773–790. doi: 10.1177/0020872809358401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Chung, D., & Evans, T. (2014). Complexities of discretion in social services in the third sector. European Journal of Social Work, 17(2), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Ranzijn, R., Winefield, A., & Marsden, H. (2004). Intellectual capital: Mapping employee and work group attributes to specify human and structural capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(3), 443–463. doi: 10.1108/14691930410550390
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. (2008). Statutory social workers: Stress, job satisfaction, coping, social support and individual differences. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 1173–1193. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon, T. J. (2004). A review of informal learning literature, theory and implications for practice in developing global professional competence. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28, 283–295. doi: 10.1108/03090590410527663
   Google Scholar
• Davys, A., & Beddoe, L. (2010). Best practice in professional supervision: A guide for the helping professions. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dent, M., Chandler, J., & Barry, J. (2004). Questioning the new public management. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, K., & Bogo, M. (2009). Moving beyond the administrative: Supervisors’ perspectives on clinical supervision in child welfare. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3, 87–105. doi: 10.1080/15548730802695105
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method: 2007 update with new internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, R. (2012). Australian social work supervision practice in 2007. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 171–184. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2011.653575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273. doi: 10.1080/158037042000225245
   Google Scholar
• Greuning, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of new public management. International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1
   Google Scholar
• Jacquet, S. E., Clark, S. J., Morazes, J. L., & Withers, R. (2007). The role of supervision in the retention of public child welfare workers. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 1(3), 27–54. doi: 10.1300/J479v01n03_03
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2004). Supervision, learning and transformative practices. In N. Gould & M. Baldwin (Eds.), Social Work, critical reflection and the learning organization (pp. 11–22). Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kaboolian, L. (1998). The new public management: Challenging the boundaries of the management vs. administration debate. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 189–193. doi: 10.2307/976558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, M. (2000). Social services: Managing the third way. In J. Clarke, S. Gewirtz, & E. McLaughlin (Eds.), New Managerialism (pp. 152–168). New Welfare. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research: Planning and design. NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of individuals in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. W. (1999). Exploring the iceberg of adult learning: Findings of the first Canadian survey of informal learning practices. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 13(2), 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Marsick, V., & Volpe, M. (Eds.). (1999). Informal learning on the job. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Marsick, V., & Watkins, K. (2001). Information and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89(Special Issue 2001), 25–34. doi: 10.1002/ace.5
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, D., & Sudbery, J. (2005). “Who do I tell?” Support and consultation in cases of ethical conflict. Journal of Social Work, 5 (April), 21–43. doi: 10.1177/1468017305051362
   Google Scholar
• Milne, D., Aylott, H., Fitzpatrick, H., & Ellis, M. V. (2008). How does clinical supervision work? Using a “best evidence synthesis” approach to construct a basic model of supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 170–190. doi: 10.1080/07325220802487915
   Google Scholar
• Mor Barak, M. E., Levin, A., Nissly, J. A., & Lane, C. J. (2006). “Why do they leave?” Modeling child welfare workers’ turnover intentions. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 548–577. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mor Barak, M. E., Travis, D. J., Pyun, H., & Xie, B. (2009). The impact of supervision on worker outcomes: A meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 83(1), 3–32. doi: 10.1086/599028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, C., & Irwin, J. (2009). Social work supervision: An exploration of the current challenges in a rapidly changing social, economic and political environment. Journal of Social Work, 9(3), 345–358. doi: 10.1177/1468017309334848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue, K., & Tsui, M. (2015). Social work supervision research (1970–2010): The way we were and the way ahead. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 616–633. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2008). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organisation Studies, 28, 1243–1264. doi: 10.1177/0170840607076586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., & Farrow, J. (1993). Evaluating standards of social work supervision in child welfare and hospital social work. Australian Social Work, 46(2), 33–41. doi: 10.1080/03124079308410664
   Google Scholar