Obtaining Expert Evidence in Child Protection Court Proceedings

References

• Akhtar, N., & Jaswal, V. K. (2013). Deficit or difference? Interpreting diverse developmental paths: An introduction to the special section. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 1–3. doi: 10.1037/a0029851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. (2014). Protecting the rights of Indigenous and multicultural children and preserving their cultures in fostering and adoption. Family Court Review, 52(1), 6–27. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12067
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2018). Child protection Australia 2016–17 (Child Welfare Series No. 68. Cat. No. CWS 63). Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Borowski, A., & Sheehan, R. (2013). The children’s court of Victoria. In R. Sheehan & A. Borowski (Eds.), Australia's children's courts today and tomorrow (pp. 123–142). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bromfield, L., Gillingham, P., & Higgins, D. (2007). Cumulative harm and chronic child maltreatment. Developing Practice, 19, 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., & Bates, P. (1998). The position of parents using experts in care proceedings: A failure of “partnership”? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 20(1), 23–48. doi: 10.1080/09649069808410229
   Google Scholar
• Budd, K. S., & Springman, R. E. (2011). Empirical analysis of referral issues and “ultimate issue” recommendations for parents in child protection cases. Family Court Review, 49(1), 34–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2010.01351.x
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., Dioso-Villa, R., & Rathus, Z. (2016). Judicial decision-making and “outside” extra-legal knowledge: Breaking down silos. Griffith Law Review, 25(3), 283–290. doi: 10.1080/10383441.2016.1264100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore, J., & Parkinson, P. (2014). The use and abuse of social science research evidence in children’s cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(3), 239–250. doi: 10.1037/law0000010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. K., & Yoon, A. H. (2005). Does Frye or Daubert matter? A study of scientific admissibility standards. Virginia Law Review, 91(2), 471–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child Protection Act (Queensland). (1999). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/2018-01-29/act-1999-010
   Google Scholar
• Children's Court Act (NSW). (1987). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/act/1987/53/full
   Google Scholar
• Children's Court Clinic. (2011). Authorised clinicians’ handbook. Sydney: The Sydney Children's Hospital Network. Retrieved from https://www.schn.health.nsw.gov.au/files/attachments/achandbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Childrens Court Act (Queensland). (1992). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/inforce/current/act-1992-041.
   Google Scholar
• Childrens Court of Queensland. (2017). Childrens Court of Queensland Annual Report 2016–2017. Retrieved from https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/548135/cc-ar-2016-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Children’s Court of Victoria. (2018). Children’s Court Clinic. Retrieved from https://www.childrenscourt.vic.gov.au/jurisdictions/criminal/childrens-court-clinic
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, P. D., Scott, D., & Scales, B. (2012). Report of the protecting Victoria’s vulnerable children inquiry. Retrieved from http://www.childprotectioninquiry.vic.gov.au/report-pvvc-inquiry.html
   Google Scholar
• Department of Child Safety, Youth and Women. (2018). Practice resource: Working with OCFOS and DCPL. Retrieved from https://www.communities.qld.gov.au/resources/childsafety/practice-manual/pr-working-with-ocfos-dcpl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, J. (2007). Child neglect and the law: Catapults, thresholds and delay. Child Abuse Review, 16(2), 77–92. doi: 10.1002/car.975
   Google Scholar
• Director of Child Protection Litigation Act. (2016). (Queensland). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/inforce/current/act-2016-023
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, E., Bolitho, J., Hansen, P., & Hudson, M. (2013). The children’s court in New South Wales. In R. Sheehan & A. Borowski (Eds.), Australia's children's courts today and tomorrow (pp. 27–44). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, M. (2014). Family law proceedings and the child's right to be heard in Australia, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Canada. Family Court Review, 52(1), 46–59. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12069
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. M., & Moltzen, N. (2004). Psychological evaluation of the child's best interests: The interpretation of data in the preparation of child welfare reports in the New Zealand family court. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11(2), 214–225. doi: 10.1375/pplt.2004.11.2.214
   Google Scholar
• Freckleton, I., & Selby, H. (Eds.). (2009). Expert evidence: Law, practice, procedure and advocacy (4th ed.). Sydney: Law Book.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, N., Tranah, T., & Sheldrick, E. C. (1999). The impact of expert evidence on care proceedings. Child Abuse Review, 8(3), 183–192. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0852(199905/06)8:3<183::AID-CAR538>3.0.CO;2-D
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J. (2007). Perspectives on family law & social science research: Introducing perspectives in family law and social science research. Family Court Review, 45(1), 15. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00125.x
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. F., & Ramsey, S. H. (2009). Standards for social science amicus briefs in family and child law cases. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 13(1), 81–103.
   Google Scholar
• Lempert, R. (2013). Growing up in law and society: The pulls of policy and methods. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 9, 1–32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludolph, P. S., & Dale, M. D. (2012). Attachment in child custody: An additive factor, not a determinative one. Family Law Quarterly, 46(1), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland Child Protection Commission of Inquiry. (2013). Taking responsibility: A roadmap for Queensland Child Protection. Brisbane: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rathus, Z. (2014). The role of social science in Australian family law: Collaborator, usurper or infiltrator? Family Court Review, 52(1), 69–89. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12071
   Google Scholar
• Roper, E. J. (2015). Ethical dilemmas in child protection for paediatricians. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 51(4), 357–360. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, R., & Borowski, A. (Eds.). (2013). Australia's children's courts today and tomorrow. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, R., & Borowski, A. (2014). Australia's children's courts: An assessment of the status of and challenges facing the child welfare jurisdiction in Victoria. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36(2), 95–110. doi: 10.1080/09649069.2014.916079
   Google Scholar
• Sproule, W. (2006). Content analysis. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social research methods: An Australian perspective (pp. 114–133). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, S. (2012). Inside the lion's den: The risks to experts entering into child protection court proceedings. Journal of Social Work Practice, 26(3), 315–326. doi: 10.1080/02650533.2011.599489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C. (2013). Child protection proceedings in the children’s court of Queensland: Therapeutic opportunities lost. Australian Journal of Family Law, 27(2), 170–187.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, K. J., & Alexander, J. C. (2013). Sex, lies, and statistics: Inferences from the child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 41(3), 412–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar