338
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Practice, Policy, & Perspectives

Relationship Separation and Help-seeking: Reporting on an Agency Study

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 375-383 | Received 04 Dec 2017, Accepted 15 Jan 2019, Published online: 25 Apr 2019

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Marriages and divorces, Australia. Retreived from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/3310.0
  • Behrendt, B. (2017). After divorce, giving our kids custody of the home. The New York Times. New York.
  • Bowman, D., & Forrest, F. (1987). An industry-based group for employees experiencing separation and/or divorce. Australian Social Work, 40(4), 5–8. doi: 10.1080/03124078708549949
  • Bulmer, M. (ed.). (2004). Questionnaires. Benchmarks in social science research methods. London: Sage.
  • Collier, R. (2009). The fathers’ rights movement, law reform, and the new politics of fatherhood: Some reflections on the UK experience. University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy, 1(April), 112.
  • Cook, K., & Natalier, K. (2013). The gendered framing of Australia's child support reforms. International Journal of Law Policy and the Family, 27(1), 28–50. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebs013
  • Craig, L., Mullan, K., & Blaxland, M. (2010). Parenthood, policy and work–family time in Australia 1992–2006. Work, Employment and Society, 24(1), 27–45. doi: 10.1177/0950017009353778
  • Dewar, B. (2010). Editorial: Appreciative inquiry. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 5(4), 290–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-3743.2010.00253.x
  • Dodd, S.-J., & Epstein, I. (2012). Practice-based research in social work: A guide for reluctant researchers. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Dunk, P. (2007). Everyday sexuality and social work: Locating sexuality in professional practice and education. Social Work and Society, 5(2), 135–142.
  • Fehlberg, B., & Maclean, M. (2009). Child support policy in Australia and the United Kingdom: Changing priorities but a similar tough deal for children? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 23(1), 1–24. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebn015
  • Fehlberg, B., Millward, C., Campo, M., & Carson, R. (2013). Post-separation parenting and financial arrangements: Exploring changes over time. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 27(3), 359–380. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebt008
  • Fehlberg, B., Smyth, B., Maclean, M., & Roberts, C. (2011). Legislating for shared time parenting after separation: A research review. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25(3), 318–337. doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebr015
  • Fletcher, R. J., & St George, J. M. (2010). Practitioners’ understanding of father engagement in the context of family dispute resolution. Journal of Family Studies, 16(2), 101–115. doi: 10.5172/jfs.16.2.101
  • Flood, M. (2012). Separated fathers and the “fathers’ rights” movement. Journal of Family Studies, 18(2-3), 235–345. doi: 10.5172/jfs.2012.18.2-3.235
  • Hafford-Letchfield, T., Couchman, W., Webster, M., & Avery, P. (2010). A drama project about older people's intimacy and sexuality. Educational Gerontology, 36(7), 604–621. doi: 10.1080/03601270903324511
  • Hendershott, P. H., Ong, R., Wood, G. A., & Flatau, P. (2009). Marital history and home ownership: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Housing Economics, 18(1), 13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2008.09.002
  • Kaspiew, R., Gray, M., Weston, R., Moloney, L., Hand, K., & Qu, L. (2009). Evaluation of the 2006 family law reforms. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
  • Kiraly, M., & Humphreys, C. (2013). Perspectives from young people about family contact in kinship care: “Don't push us—listen more”. Australian Social Work, 66(3), 314–327. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2012.715658
  • Lefebvre, M. (2010). Communicating with children and young people: Making a difference. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2006). Qualitative research methods. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
  • McIntosh, J. E., Wells, Y. D., Smyth, B. M., & Long, C. M. (2008). Child-focused and child-inclusive divorce mediation: Comparative outcomes from a prospective study of postseparation adjustment. Family Court Review, 46(1), 105–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00186.x
  • Moloney, L. (2013a). From helping court to community-based services: The 30-year evolution of Australia's Family Relationship Centres. Family Court Review, 51(2), 214–223. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12021
  • Moloney, L. (2013b). Intervening in post-separation parenting disputes: Reflections on past, present and future principles and processes. Journal of Family Studies, 19(3), 218–223. doi: 10.5172/jfs.2013.19.3.218
  • Moloney, L., Qu, L., Hand, K., De Maio, J., Kaspiew, R., Weston, R., & Gray, M. (2010). Mandatory dispute resolution and the 2006 family law reforms: Use, outcomes, links to other pathways, and the impact of family violence. Journal of Family Studies, 16(3), 192–196. doi: 10.5172/jfs.16.3.192
  • Moloney, L., Qu, L., Weston, R., & Hand, K. (2013). Evaluating the work of Australia’s Family Relationship Centres: Evidence from the first 5 years. Family Court Review, 51(2), 234–249. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12023
  • Murphy, J. C., & Singer, J. B. (2016). Moving family dispute resolution from the court system to the community. Maryland Law Review Endnotes. Vol. 75, p. 9, 2016; University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016-15. Retreived from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2805593
  • Natalier, K. A., & Fehlberg, B. (2015). Children’s experiences of “home” and “homemaking” after parents separate: A new conceptual frame for listening and supporting adjustment. Australian Journal of Family Law, 29, 111–134.
  • Natalier, K., & Hewitt, B. (2014). Separated parents reproducing and undoing gender through defining legitimate uses of child support. Gender & Society, 28(6), 904–925. doi: 10.1177/0891243214546933
  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  • Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  • Rowntree, M. R. (2014). Making sexuality visible in Australian social work education. Social Work Education, 33(3), 353–364. doi: 10.1080/02615479.2013.834885
  • Sadowski, C., & McIntosh, J. E. (2016). On laughter and loss: Children’s views of shared time, parenting and security post-separation. Childhood (Copenhagen, Denmark), 23(1), 69–86.
  • Shaw, I., & Lunt, N. (2018). Forms of practitioner research. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(1), 141–157. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx024
  • Singer, J. B. (2009). Dispute resolution and the postdivorce family: Implications of a paradigm shift. Family Court Review, 47(3), 363–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01261.x
  • Smyth, B., Rodger, B., Son, V., Allen, L., & Vnuk, M. (2012). Separated parents’ knowledge of how changes in parenting time can affect child support payments and family tax benefit splitting in Australia: A pre-/post- reform comparison. Australian Journal of Family Law, 26, 181–213.
  • Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London: Routledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.