Using Stochastic Goal Programming: Some Applications to Management and a Case of Industrial Production

References

• Allais, M. and Hagen, O. (1979). Expected utility hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Aouni, B. and Kettani, O. (2001). Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future. European Journal of Operationai Research, 133(2), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk bearing. Helsinki: Academic Book Store.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J.L. and Lawrence, K.D. (1980). A multiple goal blending problem. Computers and Operations Research, 7, 215–224.
   Google Scholar
• Ballestero, E. (2001). Stochastic goal programming: a mean-variance approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 131, 476–481.
   Google Scholar
• Ballestero, E. (2004). Selecting Textile Products by Manufacturing Companies under uncertainty. Asia- Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 21. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Brans, J.P. and Vincke, P. (1985). A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science, 31 (6), 647–656.
   Google Scholar
• Brauers, W.K. (1998). A non-linear utility theory with multiple objectives. Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, 1, 193–203.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science. 6, 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1961). Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, T.E. and Weston, J. F. (1988). Financial theory and corporate policy. Reading (MA): Addison- Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• French, S. (1988). Decision theory. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Iwamura, K. and Liu B. (1996). A genetic algorithm for chance constrained programming. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 17, 409–422.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney R.L. and Raiffa H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Shi, Y, and Stolen, J. (1994). Allocating data files over a wide area network: goal setting and compromise design. Information & Management, 26, 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.M. and Olson D.L. (1983). Chance constrained aggregate blending. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 109, 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (1999). Dependent-chance programming with fuzzy decisions. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 7(3), 354–360.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (2002). Theory and Practice of Uncertain Programming. New York: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhandjula, M.K. (1989). Fuzzy optimization: An appraisal. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 30, 257–282.
   Google Scholar
• Mareschal, B. (1988). Geometrical representations for MCDA: The GAIA procedure. European Journal of Operational Research, 34, 69–11.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H.M. (1970). Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Martel, J.-M. and Aouni, B. (1990). Incorporating the decision maker’s preferences in the goal programming model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41(12), 1121–1132.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J.W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 112–136.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, B. (1991). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision, 31, 49–13.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (1994). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24, 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Tamiz, M., Jones, D.R, and El-Darzi, E. (1995). A review of goal programming and its applications. Annals of Operations Research, 58, 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1998. USDA table of nutrient retention factors, release 4. Nutrient Data Laboratory Home Page, http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstem, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behaviour. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yazenin, A.V. (1996). On the problem of possibilistic optimization. Fuzzy sets and systems, 81,133–140.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, P.L. (1985). Multiple criteria decision making: concepts, techniques and extensions. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeleny, M. (1982). Muttipte criteria decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Zeleny, M. and Cochrane, J. L. (1973). A priori and posteriori goals in macroeconomic policy making. In J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny (eds.): Multiple criteria decision making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 373–391.
   Google Scholar