The impact of rack layout on visual experience in a retail store

References

• Anderson EE. 1979. An analysis of retail display space: theory and methods. J Bus. 52(1):103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barfield W, Furness TA III. 1995. Virtual environments and advanced interface design. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bitner MJ. 1992. Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. J Market. 56:57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botsali AR, Peters BA. 2005. A network based layout design model for retail stores. Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering Research Conference, May 14–18, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Burke R. 2006. The third wave of marketing intelligence. In: Krafft M, Mantrala M, editors. Retailing in the 21st century: current and future trends. Berlin: Springer; p. 413.
   Google Scholar
• Burke RR, Leykin A. 2014. Identifying the drivers of shopper attention, engagement, and purchase. In: Grewal D, Roggeveen AL, NordfÄlt J, editors. Shopper marketing and the role of in-store marketing. Review of Marketing Research, Volume 11. Emerald Group Publishing. p. 147–187.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns JP. 1962. Suppliers, retailers, and shelf space. J Market 26:34–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns JP. 1963. Allocate space for maximum profits. J Retail. 39(2):41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandon P, Hutchinson JW, Bradlow ET, Young SH. 2009. Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase. J Market. 73:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement J, Kristensen T, Grnhaug K. 2013. Understanding consumers' in-store visual perception: the influence of package design features on visual attention. J Retail Cons Ser. 20:234–239.
   Google Scholar
• Committee SDVS. 1996. Vision factors considerations in rearview mirror design – SAE J985 JUN. In: SAE handbook. 95th ed. Vol. 3. Warrendale (PA): SAE; p. 122–124.
   Google Scholar
• d'Astous A. 2000. Irritating aspects of the shopping environment. J Bus Res. 49:149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreze X, Hoch SJ, Purk ME. 1994. Shelf management and space elasticity. J Retail. 70(4):301–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne PM, Lusch RF, Gable M. 1995. Retailing. 2nd ed. Cincinnati (OH): South-Western College Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Ebster C, Garaus M. 2015. Store design and visual merchandising: creating store space that encourages buying. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Business Expert Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flamand T, Ghoniem A, Maddah B. 2016. Promoting impulse buying by allocating retail shelf space to grouped product categories. J Oper Res Soc. 67:953–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gue KR, Meller RD. 2009. Aisle configurations for unit-load warehouses. IIE Trans. 41(3):171–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hübner AH, Kuhn H. 2012. Retail category management: state-of-the-art review of quantitative research and software applications in assortment and shelf space management. Omega. 40(2):199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irion J, Lu J-C, Al-Khayyal F, Tsao Y-C. 2012. A piecewise linearization framework for retail shelf space management models. Eur J Oper Res. 222:122–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu A, Dan P. 2012. Metaheuristic in facility layout problems: current trend and future direction. Int J Ind Syst Eng. 10(2):238–253.
   Google Scholar
• Larson J, Bradlow E, Fader P. 2005. An exploratory look at supermarket shopping paths. Int J Res Market. 22:395–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Seo H-B. 2015. Developing visibility analysis for a retail store: a pilot study in a bookstore. Environ Plan B Plan Des. 42:95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Meller RD, Gau KY. 1996. The facility layout problem: recent and emerging trends and perspectives. J Manuf Syst. 15(5):351–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orquin JL, Loose MS. 2013. Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica. 144(2013):190–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panero J, Zelnik M. 1979. Human dimension & interior space. New York (NY): Whitney Library of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock B, Karwowski W. 1993. Automotive ergonomics. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Peters BA, Klutke G-A, Botsali AR. 2004. Research issues in retail facility layout design. Proceedings of the Material Handling Conference. p. 399–414.
   Google Scholar
• POPAI. 2014. Mass merchant shopper engagement study executive summary report. http://www.shopassociation.org/a-r-e-popai-mass-merchant-shopper-study/
   Google Scholar
• Russo JE, Leclerc F. 1994. An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for consumer nondurables. J Consum Res. 21(2):274–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar V, Inman JJ, Mantrala M, Kelley E, Rizley R. 2011. Innovations in shopper marketing: current insights and future research issues. J Retail. 87 Suppl 1:S29–S42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SP, Sharma RK. 2006. A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 30(5/6):425–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen H. 2008. Long tail media in the store. J Advertising Res. 48(3):329–338.
   Google Scholar
• Suher J, Sorensen H. 2010. The power of atlas why in-store shopping behavior matters. J Advertising Res. 50(1):21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turley LW, Milliman RE. 2000. Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: a review of the experimental evidence. J Bus Res. 49(2):193–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware C. 2004. Information visualization perception for design. 2nd ed. San Francisco (CA): Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yapicioglu H, Smith AE. 2012. Retail space design considering revenue and adjacencies using a racetrack aisle network. IIE Trans. 44(6):446–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar