DEA-based production planning considering production stability

References

• Afsharian M, Ahn H, Thanassoulis E. 2017. A DEA-based incentives system for centrally managed multi-unit organisations. Eur J Oper Res. 259(2):587–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirteimoori A, Daneshian B, Kordrostami S, Shahroodi K. 2013. Production planning in data envelopment analysis without explicit inputs. Rairo-Oper Res. 47(3):273–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S. 2011. Production planning: a DEA-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 56(1–4):369–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S. 2012. Production planning in data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Econ. 140(1):212–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An QX, Wen Y, Ding T, Li YL. 2018. Resource sharing and payoff allocation in a three-stage system: Integrating network DEA with the Shapley value method. Omega. 85:16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An QX, Wen Y, Xiong BB, Yang M, Chen XH. 2017. Allocation of carbon dioxide emission permits with the minimum cost for Chinese provinces in big data environment. J Cleaner Prod. 142:886–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An QX, Yan H, Wu J, Liang L. 2016. Internal resource waste and centralization degree in two-stage systems: an efficiency analysis. Omega. 61:89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmild M, Paradi JC, Pastor JT. 2009. Centralized resource allocation BCC models. Omega. 37(1):40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley JE. 2003. Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 147(1):198–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne MD, Bakir MA. 1999. Production planning using a hybrid simulation–analytical approach. Int J Prod Econ. 59(1–3):305–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne MD, Hossain MM. 2005. Production planning: an improved hybrid approach. Int J Prod Econ. 93–94:225–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 2(6):429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazal M, Jouini E, Tahraoui R. 2008. Production planning and inventories optimization: a backward approach in the convex storage cost case. J Math Econ. 44(9–10):997–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y. 2003. A non-radial Malmquist productivity index with an illustrative application to Chinese major industries. Int J Prod Econ. 83(1):27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li YJ, Liang L, Salo A, Wu HQ. 2016. Frontier projection and efficiency decomposition in two-stage processes with slacks-based measures. Eur J Oper Res. 250(2):543–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook WD, Tone K, Zhu J. 2014. Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega. 44:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook WD, Zhu J. 2005. Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: a DEA approach. Comput Oper Res. 32:2171–2178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilworth JB. 1993. Production and operations management: manufacturing and services. 5th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ding T, Chen Y, Wu HQ, Wei YQ. 2018. Centralized fixed cost and resource allocation considering technology heterogeneity: a DEA approach. Ann Oper Res. 268(1–2):497–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Liang L, Chen Y, Bi G. 2010. DEA-based production planning. Omega. 38(1–2):105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Liang L. 2012. Centralized production planning based on data envelopment analysis. Asia Pacific Manage Rev. 17(2):211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Fang L. 2013. A generalized DEA model for centralized resource allocation. Eur J Oper Res. 228(2):405–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang L, Zhang CQ. 2008. Resource allocation based on the DEA model. J Oper Res Soc. 59(8):1136–1141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK. 1994. Production Frontiers. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golany B. 1988. An interactive MOLP procedure for the extension of DEA to effectiveness analysis. J Oper Res Soc. 39(8):725–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C, Hwang SN. 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res. 185(1):418–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim B, Kim S. 2001. Extended model for a hybrid production planning approach. Int J Prod Econ. 73(2):165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen P, Syrjänen M. 2004. Resource allocation based on efficiency analysis. Manage Sci. 50(8):1134–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YJ, Yang M, Chen Y, Dai QZ, Liang L. 2013. Allocating a fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree. Omega. 41(1):55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Torres L, Prior D. 2016. Centralized allocation of human resources. An application to public schools. Comput Oper Res. 73:104–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano S. 2014. Company-wide production planning using a multiple technology DEA approach. J Oper Res Soc. 65(5):723–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano S, Villa G. 2004. Centralized resource allocation using data envelopment analysis. J Prod Anal. 22(1/2):143–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor R, Altimiras J, Mateo M. 2009. Planning production using mathematical programming: the case of a woodturning company. Comput Oper Res. 36(7):2173–2178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanassoulis E, Dyson RG. 1992. Estimating preferred target input – output levels using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 56(1):80–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu HQ, Lv K, Liang L, Hu HH. 2017. Measuring performance of sustainable manufacturing with recyclable wastes: a case from China’s iron and steel industry. Omega. 66:38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YL, Zhang HJ, Zhang R, Zeng ZL, Wang ZT. 2015. DEA-based production planning considering influencing factors. J Oper Res Soc. 66(11):1878–1886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar