Stability analysis and enhancement of super-efficiency model based on space distance

References

• Andersen P, Petersen NC. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 39(10):1261–1264. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avkiran NK, McCrystal A. 2012. Sensitivity analysis of network DEA: NSBM versus NRAM. Appl Math Comput. 218(22):11226–11239. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2012.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabmaldar A, Jablonsky J, Saljooghi HF. 2017. A new robust DEA model and super-efficiency measure. Optimization. 66(5):723–736. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2017.1295047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boljunčić V. 2006. Sensitivity analysis of an efficient DMU in DEA model with variable returns to scale (VRS). J Prod Anal. 25(1-2):173–192. doi: 10.1007/s11123-006-7139-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 2(6):429–444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Thrall RM. 1991. A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. J Prod Anal. 2(3),:197–237. doi: 10.1007/BF00159732.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Haag S, Jaska P, Semple JH. 1992. Sensitivity of efficiency classifications in the additive model of data envelopment analysis. Int J Syst Sci. 23(5), :789–798. doi: 10.1080/00207729208949248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Rousseau JJ, Semple JH. 1996. Sensitivity and Stability of Efficiency Classifications in Data Envelopment Analysis. J Prod Anal. 7(1):5–18. doi: 10.1007/BF00158473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper WW, Li S, Seiford LM, Tone K, Thrall RM, Zhu J. (2001). Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA: some recent developments. J Prod Anal, 15(3):217–246. doi: 10.1023/A:1011128409257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Du J, Huo J-Z. 2013. Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function. Omega. 41(3):621–625. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2012.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouveia MC, Dias LC, Antunes CH. 2013. Super-efficiency and stability intervals in additive DEA. The J Operat Res Soc. 64(1):86–96. doi: 10.1057/jors.2012.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He F, Xu X, Chen R, Zhang N. 2016. Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA with bounded uncertainty. Optim Lett. 10(4):737–752. doi: 10.1007/s11590-015-0895-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo GR, Hosseinzadeh F, Shoja N, Sanei M, Tohidi G. 2005. Sensitivity and stability analysis in data envelopment analysis. J Operat Res Soc. 56(3):342–345. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi HF, Shoja N, Abri GA, Jelodar FM, Firouzabadi JK. 2011. Sensitivity analysis of inefficient units in data envelopment analysis. Math Comput Modell. 53(5-6):587–596. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.09.008.
   Google Scholar
• Kao C, Hwang S. 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res. 185(1):418–429. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotfi HF, Jahanshahloo G, Esmaeili M. 2007. Sensitivity analysis of efficient units in the presence of non-discretionary inputs. Appl Math Comput. 190(2):1185–1197. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2007.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landete M, Monge FJ, Ruiz LJ. 2017. Robust DEA efficiency scores: a probabilistic/combinatorial approach. Expert Syst Appl. 86:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neralić L, Wendell ER. 2019. Enlarging the radius of stability and stability regions in Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 278(2):430–441. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasim N, Akram D, Pekka K, Banu L, Jyrki W. 2022. Robustness of efficiency scores in data envelopment analysis with interval scale data. Eur J Oper Res. 297(3):1151–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford ML, Zhu J. 1998a. Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 108(1):127–139. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00103-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiford ML, Zhu J. 1998b. Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data. J Operat Res Soc. 49(10):1060–1071. doi: 10.2307/3010530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadjadi S, Omrani H, Abdollahzadeh S, Alinaghian M, Mohammadi H. 2011. A robust super-efficiency data envelopment analysis model for ranking of provincial gas companies in Iran. Expert Syst Appl. 38(9):10875–10881. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J. 1996. Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 90(3):451–460. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00054-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J. 2001. Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 129(2):443–455. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00433-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar