Supplier selection for global service providers: a decision support system

References

• Aczél J, Saaty T. 1983. Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. J Mathematical Psychol. 27(1):93–102. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(83)90028-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguezzoul A. 2014. Third-party logistics selection problem: a literature review on criteria and methods. Omega. 49:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaratunga D, Baldry D, Sarshar M. 2000. Assessment of facilities management performance–what next? Facilities. 18(1/2):66–75. doi: 10.1108/02632770010312187.
   Google Scholar
• Amaratunga D, Baldry D. 2003. A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance. Property Manage. 21(2):171–189. doi: 10.1108/02637470310478909.
   Google Scholar
• Bannerjee S, Bone J, Finger Y, Haley C. 2016. European digital city index methodology report. [Online; accessed 2024 January 31]. https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/edci-2016-updating-the-european-digital-city-index/.
   Google Scholar
• Bruck B, Vezzali D, Iori M, Magni C, Pretolani D. 2021. A decision support system to evaluate suppliers in the context of global service providers. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, 420–430. INSTICC, SciTePress. doi: 10.5220/0010412304200430.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno G, Esposito E, Genovese A, Simpson M. 2016. Applying supplier selection methodologies in a multi-stakeholder environment: a case study and a critical assessment. Expert Syst Appl. 43:271–285. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çebi F, Bayraktar D. 2003. An integrated approach for supplier selection. Logistics Information Manage. 16(6):395–400. doi: 10.1108/09576050310503376.
   Google Scholar
• Chai J, Ngai E. 2020. Decision-making techniques in supplier selection: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Expert Syst Appl. 140:112903. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan F, Kumar N. 2007. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega. 35(4):417–431. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Chen K, Cheng J, Wang Q, Gan V. 2018. BIM-based framework for automatic scheduling of facility maintenance work orders. Autom Constr. 91:15–30. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derek L. 1993. Integrating MCDM and DSS: barriers and counter strategies. INFOR: Information Syst Operational Res. 31(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweiri F, Kumar S, Khan S, Jain V. 2016. Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Syst Appl. 62:273–283. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2002. Competence Centre on Composite Indicators and Scoreboards (COIN). [accessed 2024 January 31]. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/composite-indicators_en. .
   Google Scholar
• Fallahpour A, Olugu E, Musa S, Wong K, Noori S. 2017. A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Comput Industr Engin. 105:391–410. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira J, Roy B. 2002. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur J Oper Res. 139(2):317–326. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Pishdad-Bozorgi P. 2019. BIM-enabled facilities operation and maintenance: a review. Adv Eng Inf. 39:227–247. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2019.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Cascales MS, Lamata MT. 2012. On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Math Comput Modell. 56(5–6):123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.022.
   Google Scholar
• Ghodsypour S, O'Brien C. 2001. The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint. Int J Prod Econ. 73(1):15–27. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00093-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghodsypour SH, O'Brien C. 1998. A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. Int J Prod Econ. 56–57:199–212. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00009-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffin K, Szwejczewski M, New C. 1997. Managing suppliers: when fewer can mean more. Int J Phys Distribution & Logistics Manage. 27(7):422–436. doi: 10.1108/09600039710188486.
   Google Scholar
• Govindan K, Rajendran S, Sarkis J, Murugesan P. 2015. Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J Cleaner Prod. 98:66–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira J. 2016. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. In volume 233 of International series in operations research & management science. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Soni U, Kumar G. 2019. Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: a case study in automotive industry. Computers & Industr Engin. 136:663–680. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdan S, Cheaitou A. 2017. Supplier selection and order allocation with green criteria: an MCDM and multi-objective optimization approach. Computers & Oper Res. 81:282–304. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2016.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho W, Ma X. 2018. The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 267(2):399–414. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho W, Xu X, Dey P. 2010. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 202(1):16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka A, Labib A. 2011. Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl. 38(11):14336–14345. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizaka A, Nemery P. 2013. Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. 1st ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner F, Lienland B, Utz S. 2019. An a posteriori decision support methodology for solving the multi-criteria supplier selection problem. Eur J Oper Res. 272(2):505–522. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid D. 1994. Integrated Facility Management. Facilities. 12(8):20–23. doi: 10.1108/02632779410062353.
   Google Scholar
• Kull T, Talluri S. 2008. A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 55(3):409–419. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2008.922627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavy S, Garcia J, Dixit M. 2010. Establishment of KPIs for facility performance measurement: review of literature. Facilities. 28(9/10):440–464. doi: 10.1108/02632771011057189.
   Google Scholar
• Mafakheri F, Breton M, Ghoniem A. 2011. Supplier selection-order allocation: a two-stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach. Int J Prod Econ. 132(1):52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matarneh S, Danso-Amoako M, Al-Bizri S, Gaterell M, Matarneh R. 2019. Building information modeling for facilities management: a literature review and future research directions. J Building Engin. 24:100755. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffmann A, Giovannini E. 2020. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. [accessed 2024 January 31]. https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/handbook-constructing-composite-indicators-methodology-user-guide-0_en.
   Google Scholar
• Nemati-Lafmejani R, Davari-Ardakani H. 2021. Multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem along with contractor selection. INFOR: Inform Syst Oper Res. 59(2):212–231. doi: 10.1080/03155986.2020.1803720.
   Google Scholar
• Patacas J, Dawood N, Kassem M. 2020. BIM for facilities management: a framework and a common data environment using open standards. Autom Constr. 120:103366. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerol J, Barba-Romero S. 2000. Multicriterion decision in management: principles and practice. In: volume 25 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. 1st ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pretolani D. 2020. Multiple criteria decision analysis theory and tools for the SDEWES index. J Sustain Dev Energy Water Environ Syst. 8(4):654–677. doi: 10.13044/j.sdewes.d7.0315.
   Google Scholar
• Pun K, Choy K, Lam H. 2018. A cloud-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision support system for procurement process in facility management. In: 2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 1–8. IEEE. doi: 10.23919/PICMET.2018.8481800.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty T. 1990. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 48(1):9–26. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saputro T, Figueira G, Almada-Lobo B. 2022. A comprehensive framework and literature review of supplier selection under different purchasing strategies. Computers & Industr Engin. 167:108010. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SDEWES Centre. 2016. SDEWES Index. [accessed 2024 January 31]. https://www.sdewes.org/sdewes_index.php.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. 2012. Application of the sustainability assessment of technologies methodology: guidance manual. [accessed 2024 January 31]. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/application-sustainability-assessment-technologies-methodology-guidance-manual-nov.
   Google Scholar
• Wang G, Huang S, Dismukes J. 2004. Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Int J Prod Econ. 91(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00221-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Luo Y. 2009. On rank reversal in decision analysis. Math Comput Modell. 49(5–6):1221–1229. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.019.
   Google Scholar
• Weber C, Current J, Benton W. 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur J Oper Res. 50(1):2–18. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong J, Ge J, He S. 2018. Digitisation in facilities management: a literature review and future research directions. Autom Constr. 92:312–326. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Niu Z, Zuo Y, L C. 2023. Two-stage hybrid model for supplier selection and order allocation considering cyber risk. INFOR: Information Syst Oper Res. 61(4):530–558. doi: 10.1080/03155986.2023.2241324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar