Effect of square pulsed magnetic field exposure on growth kinetics of Dickeya solani

References

• Ahmed I, Istivan T, Cosic I, Pirogova E. 2013. Evaluation of the effects of extremely low frequency (ELF) pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) on survival of the bacterium Staphylococcus aureus. EPJ Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 1(1):5. doi:10.1140/epjnbp12
   Google Scholar
• Ali FM, El-Gebaly RH, Mohamed SA, Abdelbacki AMM. 2017. Biophysical control of the growth of Agrobacterium tumefaciens using extremely low frequency electromagnetic waves at resonance frequency. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 494:365–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali FM, Elkhatib AM, Aboutaleb WM, Abdelbacki AM, Khalil AM, El-Kaliuoby MI. 2014. Control the activity of Ralstonia solanacearum bacteria by using pulsed electric field. Jokull J. 64(4):255–269.
   Google Scholar
• Alipov YD, Belyaev IY. 1996. Di¡erence in frequency spectrum of ELF effect on the genome conformational state of AB1157 and EMG2 E. coli cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 17(5):384–387. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:5<384::AID-BEM5>3.0.CO;2-#
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayse I, Burak A, Zafer A, Dilek A, A, Nilufer O, Tangul S. 2011. Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on growth rate and morphology of bacteria. Int J Radiat Biol. 87(12):1155–1161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghaee-Ravari S, Rahimian H, Shams-Bakhsh M, Lopez-Solanilla E, Antúnez-Lamas M, Rodríguez-Palenzuela P. 2011. Characterization of Pectobacterium species from Iran using biochemical and molecular methods. Eur J Plant Pathol. 129(3):413–425. doi:10.1007/s10658-010-9704-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayır E, Bilgi E, Şendemir-Ürkmez A, Hameş-Kocabaş EE. 2015. The effects of different intensities, frequencies and exposure times of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Electromagn Biol Med. 34(1):14–18. doi:10.3109/15368378.2013.853671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson DE, Grissom CB, Burns GL, Mohammad SF. 1994. Magnetic field enhancement of antibiotic activity in biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ASAIO J. 40(3):371–376.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman CF, Blanchard JP, Benane SG, House DE. 1994. Empirical test of an ion parametric resonance model for magnetic field interactions with PC-12 cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 15(3):239–260. doi:10.1002/bem.2250150307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charkowski A, Blanco C, Condemine G, Expert D, Franza T, Hayes C, Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat N, Solanilla EL, Low D, Moleleki L, et al. 2012. The role of secretion systems and small molecules in soft rot enterobacteriaceae pathogenicity. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 50(1):425–449. doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charkowsky AO. 2006. The soft rot Erwinia. In: Gnanamanickam SS, editor. Plant-associated bacteria. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 423–505.
   Google Scholar
• Demicheli MC, Goes AM, de Andrade AS. 2007. Ultrastructural changes in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis yeast cells attenuated by gamma irradiation. Mycoses. 50:397–402. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01389.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dordas C. 2008. Role of nutrients in controlling plant diseases in sustainable agriculture: a review. Agron Sustain Dev. 28(1):33–46. doi:10.1051/agro:2007051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkaliuoby MI, El-Khatib AM, Khalil AM. 2019. Does engineering of nanoshapes have antibacterial synergy with magnetic signal exposure? Surf Innov. 7(5):260–267. doi:10.1680/jsuin.19.00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkaliuoby MI, Khalil AM, El-Khatib AM, Shalaby TI. 2018. Synergistic antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles and extremely low frequency pulsed magnetic fields on Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 6(6):039–045.
   Google Scholar
• El-Khatib AM, Khalil AM, El-Kaliuoby MI, Elkhatib M. 2019. The combined effects of multisized silver nanoparticles and pulsed magnetic field on K. pneumoniae. Bioinspir Biomim Nanobiomater. 8(2):154–160. doi:10.1680/jbibn.18.00042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farag NS, A.Gomah A, Balabel NM. 2009. Epidemiology of potato blackleg in warm climate. Plant Pathol J. 8(1):27–31. doi:10.3923/ppj.2009.27.31
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons RJ, Ryaby JT, Magee FP, Baylink DJ. 1994. Combined magnetic fields increased net calcium flux in bone cells. Calcif Tissue Int. 55(5):376–380. doi:10.1007/BF00299318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fojt L, Strasak L, Vetterl V, Smarda J. 2004. Comparison of the low frequency magnetic field effects on bacteria Escherichia coli, Lecleria adecarboxylata and Staphylococcus aureus. Bioelectrochemistry. 63(1–2):337–341. doi:10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobba F, Malagoli D, Ottaviani E. 2003. Effects of 50 Hz magnetic fields on fMLP-induced shape changes in invertebrate immunocytes: the role of calcium ion channels. Bioelectromagnetics. 24(4):277–282. doi:10.1002/bem.10102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomah AA, Mahmoud SM. 2007. Usage of actinobacteria to control bacterial soft rot disease of potato. Ann Agric Sci Ain Shams Univ Cairo. 52:233–239.
   Google Scholar
• Hashizume T, Ishino F, Nakagawa J-I, Tamaki S, Matsuhashi M. 1984. Studies on the mechanism of action of imipenem (N-formimidoylthienamycin) in vitro: binding to the penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and inhibition of enzyme activities due to the PBPs in E. coli. J Antibiot. 37(4):394–400. doi:10.7164/antibiotics.37.394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhan-Garip A, Aksu B, Akan Z, Akakin D, Ozaydin AN, San T. 2011. Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on growth rate and morphology of bacteria. Int J Radiat Biol. 87(12):1155–1161. doi:10.3109/09553002.2011.560992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivan S, Branka S. 2004. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J Colloid Interface Sci. 275(1):177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justo OR, Perez VH, Alvarez DC, Alegre RM. 2006. Growth of Escherichia coli under extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 134(2):155–163. doi:10.1385/ABAB:134:2:155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohno M, Yamazaki M, Kimura I, Wada M. 2000. Effect of static magnetic fields on bacteria: Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli. Pathophysiology. 7(2):143–148. doi:10.1016/S0928-4680(00)00042-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• López-Díez EC, Winder CL, Ashton L, Currie F, Goodacre R. 2005. Monitoring the mode of action of antibiotics using Raman spectroscopy: investigating subinhibitory effects of amikacin on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Anal Chem. 77(9):2901–2906. doi:10.1021/ac048147m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo FL, Yang N, He C, Li HL, Li C, Chen F, Xiong JX, Hu ZA, Zhang J. 2014. Exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields alters the calcium dynamics of cultured entorhinal cortex neurons. Environ Res. 135:236–246. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffei ME. 2014. Magnetic field effects on plant growth, development, and evolution. Front Plant Sci. 5:445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malagoli D, Lusvardi M, Gobba F, Ottaviani E. 2004. 50 Hz magnetic fields activate mussel immunocyte p38 MAP kinase and induce HSP70 and 90. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 137(1):75–79. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2003.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martirosyan V. 2012. The effects of physical factors on bacterial cell proliferation. J Low Freq Noise Vibr Active Contr. 31(4):247–256. doi:10.1260/0263-0923.31.4.247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masood S. 2017. Effect of weak magnetic field on bacterial growth. Biophys Rev Lett. 12(4):177–186. doi:10.1142/S1793048017500102
   Google Scholar
• Obermeier A, Matl FD, Friess W, Stemberger A. 2009. Growth inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus induced by low-frequency electric and electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 30(4):270–279. doi:10.1002/bem.20479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oncul S, Cuce EM, Aksu B, Inhan Garip A. 2016. Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on bacterial membrane. Int J Radiat Biol. 92(1):42–49. doi:10.3109/09553002.2015.1101500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perombelon MC. 2002. Potato diseases caused by soft rot erwinias: an overview of pathogenesis. Plant Pathol. 51(1):1–12. doi:j.0032-0862.2001/j.0032-0862.2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesce M, Patruno A, Speranza L, Reale M. 2013. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field and wound healing: implication of cytokines as biological mediators. Eur Cytokine Netw. 24:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prato FS, Carson JJL, Ossenkopp KP, Kavaliers M. 1995. Possible mechanism by which extremely low frequency magnetic fields affect opioid function. FASEB J. 9(9):807–814. doi:10.1096/fasebj.9.9.7601344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SD, McLeod BR, Liboff AR, Cooksey K. 1987. Calcium cyclotron resonance and diatom mobility. Bioelectromagnetics. 8(3):215–227. doi:10.1002/bem.2250080302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasak L, Vetterl V, Fojt L. 2005. Effects of 50 Hz magnetic fields on the viability of different bacterial strains. Electromagn Biol Med. 24(3):293–300. doi:10.1080/15368370500379715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasak L, Vetterl V, Smarda J. 2002. Effect of low frequency magnetic fields on bacteria Escherichia coli. Bioelectrochemistry. 55(1–2):161–164. doi:10.1016/S1567-5394(01)00152-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudarti P, Yushardi T, Ridlo ZR, Kristinawati A. 2018. Effective dose analysis of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic field exposure to growth of S. thermophilus, L. lactis, L. acidophilus bacteria. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 43(1):012010.
   Google Scholar
• Toth IK, van der Wolf JM, Saddler G, Lojkowska E, Hélias V, Pirhonen M, Tsror Lahkim L, Elphinstone JG. 2011. Dickeya species: an emerging problem for potato production in Europe. Plant Pathol. 60(3):385–399. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02427.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya H, Begum L, Dey B, Nath PK, Panda SK. 2017. Impact of calcium phosphate nanoparticles on rice plant. J Plant Sci Phytopathol. 1:001–010.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. 2000. Kinetics of microbial inactivation for alternative food processing technologies: oscillating magnetic fields. http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/comm/ift-omf.html.
   Google Scholar
• van der Wolf JM, De Boer SH. 2007. Bacterial pathogens of potato. In: Vreugdenhil D, editor. Potato biology and biotechnology, advances and perspectives. Oxford: Elsevier; p. 595–619.
   Google Scholar
• van der Wolf JM, Nijhuis EH, Kowalewska MJ, Saddler GS, Parkinson N, Elphinstone JG, Pritchard L, Toth IK, Lojkowska E, Potrykus M, et al. 2014. Dickeya solani sp. nov., a pectinolytic plant-pathogenic bacterium isolated from potato (Solanum tuberosum). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 64(Pt 3):768–774. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.052944-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanhauteghem D, Janssens GPJ, Lauwaerts A, Sys S, Boyen F, Cox E, Meyer E. 2013. Exposure to the proton scavenger glycine under alkaline conditions induces Escherichia coli viability loss. PLoS One. 8(3):e60328. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber DJ, Tolkoff-Rubin NE, Rubin RH. 1984. Amoxicillin and potassium clavulanate: an antibiotic combination mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, antimicrobial spectrum, clinical efficacy and adverse effects. Pharmacotherapy. 4(3):122–133. doi:10.1002/j.1875-9114.1984.tb03333.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams PA, Ingebretsen RJ, Dawson RJ. 2006. 14.6 mT ELF magnetic field exposure yields no DNA breaks in model system Salmonella, but provides evidence of heat stress protection. Bioelectromagnetics. 27(6):445–450. doi:10.1002/bem.20210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakir-Blumkin MB, Loboda Y, Schächter L, Finberg J. 2014. Neuroprotective effect of weak static magnetic fields in primary neuronal cultures. Neuroscience. 278:313–326. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.08.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalata A, El-Samanoudy AZ, Shaalan D, El-Baiomy Y, Mostafa T. 2015. In vitro effect of cell phone radiation on motility, DNA fragmentation and cluster in gene expression in human sperm. Int J Fertil Steril. 9:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu X, Zhang J, Li N. 2015. Short-term effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields exposure on Alzheimer’s disease in rats. Int J Radiat Biol. 91(1):28–34. doi:10.3109/09553002.2014.954058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar