Exploring the relationship between homework task difficulty, student engagement and performance

References

• Archambault, I., M. Janosz, J.-S. Fallu, and L. S. Pagani. 2009. “Student Engagement and its Relationship with Early High School Dropout.” Journal of Adolescence 32 (3): 651–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F. 2002. “Some Reflections on Task-Based Language Performance Assessment.” Language Testing 19 (4): 453–476.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley, E. 2009. Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. J. 1988. “Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis.” Academy of Management Review 13 (1): 40–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. J., and D. R. Ilgen. 1976. “Additive Effects of Task Difficulty and Goal Setting on Subsequent Task Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 61 (3): 319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, R. M., G. D. Kuh, and S. P. Klein. 2006. “Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages.” Research in Higher Education 47 (1): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. M. 2005. “Developmentally Sensitive Measures of Executive Function in Preschool Children.” Developmental Neuropsychology 28 (2): 595–616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Conejo, R., E. Guzmán, J.-L. Perez-De-La-Cruz, and B. Barros. 2014. “An Empirical Study on the Quantitative Notion of Task Difficulty.” Expert Systems with Applications 41 (2): 594–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowson, M., and D. M. McInerney. 2001. “Psychological Parameters of Students’ Social and Work Avoidance Goals: A Qualitative Investigation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (1): 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garon, N., S. E. Bryson, and I. M. Smith. 2008. “Executive Function in Preschoolers: A Review Using an Integrative Framework.” Psychological Bulletin 134 (1): 31–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S., G. Bird, C. Frith, and P. Burgess. 2012. “Does ‘Task Difficulty’ Explain ‘Task-Induced Deactivation?’.” Frontiers in Psychology 3 (125): 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haerem, T., and D. Rau. 2007. “The Influence of Degree of Expertise and Objective Task Complexity on Perceived Task Complexity and Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (5): 1320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., J. Biggs, and N. Purdie. 1996. “Effects of Learning Skills Interventions on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 66 (2): 99–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and R. Jaeger. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning: A Deductive Approach.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 111–122. doi:10.1080/0969595980050107.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, M., and M. K. Stein. 1997. “Mathematical Tasks and Student Cognition: Classroom-Based Factors that Support and Inhibit High-Level Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28 (5): 524–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimerson, S. R., E. Campos, and J. L. Greif. 2003. “Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms.” The California School Psychologist 8 (1): 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Klem, A. M., and J. P. Connell. 2004. “Relationships Matter: Linking Teacher Support to Student Engagement and Achievement.” Journal of School Health 74 (7): 262–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Q.-P., N.-Y. Wong, and C.-C. Lam. 2003. “Student Engagement in Mathematics: Development of Instrument and Validation of Construct.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 15 (1): 4–21.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41 (4): 212–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D., T. M. Cruce, R. Shoup, J. Kinzie, and R. M. Gonyea. 2008. “Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence.” The Journal of Higher Education 79 (5): 540–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamborn, S., F. Newmann, and G. Wehlage. 1992. “The Significance and Sources of Student Engagement.” In Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools, edited by F. Newmann, 11–39. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J., and A. Lane. 2001. “Self-efficacy and Academic Performance.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 29 (7): 687–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. 1996. “Electronic Homework: An Intelligent Tutoring System in Mathematics.” PhD thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., A. Lee, and M. Solmon. 2007. “The Role of Perceptions of Task Difficulty in Relation to Self-Perceptions of Ability, Intrinsic Value, Attainment Value, and Performance.” European Physical Education Review 13 (3): 301–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, R., J. V. Patten, and J. Hennessy. 2013. “The Impact of Task Difficulty and Performance Scores on Student Engagement and Progression.” Educational Research 55 (3): 291–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangos, P. M., and D. Steele-Johnson. 2001. “The Role of Subjective Task Complexity in Goal Orientation, Self-Efficacy, and Performance Relations.” Human Performance 14 (2): 169–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. C., and M. D. Hakel. 1997. “Effects of Objective and Subjective Task Complexity on Performance.” Human Performance 10 (4): 303–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., P. C. Blumenfeld, and R. H. Hoyle. 1988. “Students’ Goal Orientations and Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Activities.” Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (4): 514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. K., and J. D. Cohen. 2001. “An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 (1): 167–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., K. Stacey, and A. Barkatsas. 2007. “A Scale for Monitoring Students’ Attitudes to Learning Mathematics with Technology.” Computers & Education 48 (2): 285–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, G. R., and G. D. Kuh. 2005. “A Typology of Student Engagement for American Colleges and Universities.” Research in Higher Education 46 (2): 185–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and E. V. De Groot. 1990. “Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Préfontaine, Y., and J. Kormos. 2015. “The Relationship Between Task Difficulty and Second Language Fluency in French: A Mixed Methods Approach.” The Modern Language Journal 99 (1): 96–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, M. R., M. A. Brackett, S. E. Rivers, M. White, and P. Salovey. 2012. “Classroom Emotional Climate, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (3): 700–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roorda, D. L., H. M. Koomen, J. L. Spilt, and F. J. Oort. 2011. “The Influence of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement a Meta-Analytic Approach.” Review of Educational Research 81 (4): 493–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., and R. Rosenthal. 1996. “Computing Contrasts, Effect Sizes, and Counternulls on Other People’s Published Data: General Procedures for Research Consumers.” Psychological Methods 1 (4): 331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., M. Csikszentmihalyi, B. Shneider, and E. S. Shernoff. 2003. “Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory.” School Psychology Quarterly 18 (2): 158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. F., S. L. Christenson, D. L. Evelo, and C. M. Hurley. 1998. “Dropout Prevention for Youth with Disabilities: Efficacy of a Sustained School Engagement Procedure.” Exceptional Children 65 (1): 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E., and M. Belmont. 1993. “Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Across the School Year.” Journal of Educational Psychology 85 (4): 571–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, E. 2009. Junior Cycle Education: Insights from a Longitudinal Study of Students. ESRI Research Bulletin 2009/4/1. Dublin: ESRI.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C. Y., and R. Rueda. 2012. “Situational Interest, Computer Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation: Their Impact on Student Engagement in Distance Education.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (2): 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, H.-T., and A. Kao. 1999. “Accountability Effects on Auditors’ Performance: The Influence of Knowledge, Problem-Solving Ability, and Task Complexity.” Journal of Accounting Research 37 (1): 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar