2,459
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impact of a national professional development programme for out-of-field teachers of mathematics in Ireland

, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 401-421 | Received 15 Apr 2021, Accepted 21 Jun 2021, Published online: 29 Aug 2021

References

  • Beswick, K. 2004. “The Impact of Teachers’ Perceptions of Student Characteristics on the Enactment of Their Beliefs.” In Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2), edited by M. J. Hoines, and A. J. Fuglestad, 111–118. Bergen, Norway: PME.
  • Beswick, K. 2012. “Teachers’ Beliefs About School Mathematics and Mathematician’s Mathematics and Their Relationship to Practice.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 79 (1): 127–147.
  • Bosse, M. 2014. “The Practice of Out-of-Field Teaching in Mathematics Classrooms.” In Proceedings and Agenda for Research and Action, 1st Teaching Across Specialisations (TAS) Collective Symposium, edited by L. Hobbs, and G. Törner, 33–34. Porto, Portugal: TAS Collective.
  • Clerkin, A., R. Perkins, and E. Chubb. 2018. Inside the Post-Primary Classroom: Mathematics and Science Teaching in Second Year. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
  • Crisan, C., and M. Rodd. 2017. “Learning Mathematics for Teaching Mathematics: Non-Specialist Teachers’ Mathematics Teacher Identity.” Mathematics Teacher Education and Development 19 (2): 104–122.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., and L. Hudson. 1990. “Precollege Science and Mathematics Teachers: Supply, Demand and Quality.” Review of Research in Education 16: 223–264.
  • Denscombe, M. 2017. The Good Research Guide. 6th ed. London: Open University Press.
  • Desimone, L. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199.
  • De Vries, S., W. Van De Grift, and E. Jansen. 2014. “How Teachers’ Beliefs About Learning and Teaching Relate to Their Continuing Professional Development.” Teachers & Teaching 20 (3): 338–357.
  • Du Plessis, A., R. M. Gillies, and A. Carroll. 2015. “Understanding the Lived Experiences of Novice Out-of-Field Teachers in Relation to School Leadership Practices.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 43 (1): 4–21.
  • Ernest, P. 1989. “The Impact of Beliefs on the Teaching of Mathematics.” In Mathematics Teaching: The State of the Art, edited by P. Ernest, 249–254. London: Falmer Press.
  • Faulkner, F., J. Kenny, C. Campbell, and C. Crisan. 2019. “Teacher Learning and Continuous Professional Development.” In Examining the Phenomenon of ‘Teaching Out-of-Field’: International Perspectives on Teaching as a Non-Specialist, edited by L. Hobbs and G. Törner, 269–308. Singapore: Springer Nature.
  • Furinghetti, F., and E. Pehkonen. 2002. “Rethinking Characterizations of Beliefs.” In Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education?, edited by G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, and G. Törner, 39–57. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Goos, M., and A. Guerin.2021. “Insights into the Pedagogical Practices of Out-of-Field, In-field, and Upskilled Teachers of Mathematics.” In Excellence in mathematics education: Foundations and pathways (Proceedings of the 43rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia), edited by Y. H. Leong, B. Kaur, B. H. Choy, J. B. W. Yeo, and S. L. Chin, 203–210. Singapore: MERGA.
  • Goos, M., J. O’Donoghue, M. Ní Ríordáin, F. Faulkner, T. Hall, N. O’Meara. 2020. “Designing a National Blended Learning Program for ‘Out-of-Field’ Mathematics Teacher Professional Development.” ZDM Mathematics Education 52 (5): 893–905.
  • Hobbs, L., and G. Törner. 2019. Examining the Phenomenon of ‘Teaching Out-of-Field’: International Perspectives on Teaching as a Non-Specialist. Singapore: Springer Nature.
  • Ingersoll, R. M. 2002. Out-of-Field Teaching, Educational Inequality and the Organization of Schools: An Exploratory Analysis. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
  • Ingersoll, R. M. 2019. “Measuring Out-of-Field Teaching.” In Examining the Phenomenon of ‘Teaching Out-of-Field’: International Perspectives on Teaching as a Non-Specialist, edited by L. Hobbs, and G. Törner, 21–51. Singapore: Springer Nature.
  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. 2014. TIMSS 2015 Teacher Questionnaire Mathematics. Accessed 14 April 2021. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/questionnaires/index.html.
  • Kunter, M., T. Kleickmann, U. Klusmann, and D. Richter. 2013. “Professional Competence of Teachers: Effects on Instructional Quality and Student Development.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (3): 805–820.
  • Lane, C., and M. Ní Ríordáin. 2020. “Out-of-Field Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices: An Examination of Change and Tensions Using Zone Theory.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18: 337–355.
  • Lozano, L. M., E. García-Cueto, and J. Muñiz. 2008. “Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales.” Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences 4 (2): 73–79.
  • National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. 2005. Review of Mathematics in Post-Primary Education – A Discussion Paper. Dublin: NCCA.
  • Ní Ríordáin, M., and A. Hannigan. 2009. Out-of-Field Teaching in Post-Primary Mathematics Education: An Analysis of the Irish Context. Limerick, Ireland: NCE-MSTL. http://epistem.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Out-of-field-teaching-in-post-primary-Maths-Education.pdf.
  • Ní Ríordáin, M., C. Paolucci, and L. O’Dwyer. 2017. “An Examination of the Professional Development Needs of Out-of-Field Mathematics Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 64: 162–174.
  • O’Meara, N., and F. Faulkner. 2021. “Professional Development for Out-of-Field Post-Primary Teachers of Mathematics: An Analysis of the Impact of Mathematics Specific Pedagogy Training.” Irish Educational Studies. doi:10.1080/03323315.2021.1899026.
  • Pajares, F. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct.” Review of Educational Research 62 (3): 307–332.
  • Perry, B., P. Howard, and D. Tracey. 1999. “Head Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs About the Learning and Teaching of Mathematics.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 11 (1): 39–53.
  • Sosniak, L. A., C. A. Ethington, and M. Varelas. 1991. “Teaching Mathematics Without a Coherent Point of View: Findings from the IEA Second International Mathematics Study.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 23 (2): 119–131.
  • Speer, N. M. 2005. “Issues of Methods and Theory in the Study of Mathematics Teachers’ Professed and Attributed Beliefs.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 58 (3): 361–391.
  • Stigler, J. W., and J. Hiebert. 2004. “Improving Mathematics Teaching.” Educational Leadership 61 (5): 12–17.
  • Teaching Council. 2013. Teaching Council Registration: Curricular Subject Requirements (Post-Primary) for Persons Applying for Registration on or after 1 January 2017. Accessed 14 April 2021. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/en/Publications/Registration/Documents/Curricular-Subject-Requirments-after-January-2017.pdf.
  • Teaching Council. 2016. Cosán: Framework for Teachers’ Learning. Accessed 14 April 2021. https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/en/Publications/Teacher-Education/Cosan-Framework-for-Teachers-Learning.pdf.
  • Vale, C., A. McAndrew, and S. Krishnan. 2011. “Connecting with the Horizon: Developing Teachers’ Appreciation of Mathematical Structure.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 14 (3): 193–212.
  • Zhang, Q., and F. Morselli. 2016. “Teacher Beliefs.” In Attitudes, Beliefs, Motivation and Identity in Mathematics Education: An Overview of the Field and Future Directions, edited by G. Kaiser, 11–14. Cham: Springer.