Archaeo-Material Study of the Cuneiform Tablet from Tel Beth-Shemesh

References

• Albright, W.F. 1934. The Cuneiform Tablet from Beth-Shemesh. BASOR 53: 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, W.F. 1964. The Beth-Shemesh Tablet in Alphabetic Cuneiform. BASOR 173: 51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, G.A. 1933. Notes on the Ain Shems Tablet. BASOR 52: 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bentor, Y.K. 1966. The Clays of Israel: Guide-Book to the Excursions. Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• Bordreuil, P. and Pardee, D. 1995. Un abécédaire du type sud-sémitique découvert en 1988 dans les fouilles archéologiques françaises de Ras Shamra-Ougarit. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 139: 855–860.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C., Maran, J. and Vetters, M. 2010. An Ivory Rod with a Cuneiform Inscription, Most Probably Ugaritic, from a Final Palatial Workshop in the Lower Citadel of Tir yns. Archäologischer Anzeiger 2: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dan, J., Yaalon, D.H., Koyumdjisky, H. and Raz, Z. 1972. The Soil Association Map of Israel. 1:1,000,000. Israel Journal of Earth-Sciences 21: 29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, M. and Loretz, O. 1988. Die Keilalphabete: Die phönizisch-kanaanäischen und altarabischen Alphabete in Ugarit (Abhandlungen zur Literatur Alt-Syrien-Palastinas 1). Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, M., Loretz, L. and Sanmartín, J. 1974. Die fünf beschrifteten Axte aus Ugarit. UF 6: 463.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Elfert, H.W. and Krebernik, M. 2016. Zu den Buchstabennamen auf dem Halaham-Ostrakon aus TT 99 (Grab des Sennefri). Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 143: 169–176. doi: 10.1515/zaes-2016-0011
   Google Scholar
• Goren, Y., Finkelstein, I. and Naʾaman, N. 2004. Inscribed in Clay: Provenance Study of the Amarna Tablets and Other Near Eastern Texts (Monograph Series of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University 23). Tel Aviv.
   Google Scholar
• Goren, Y., Naʾaman, N., Mommsen, H. and Finkelstein, I. 2007. Provenance Study and Re-evaluation of the Cuneiform Documents from the Egyptian Residency at Tel Aphek. Ä&L 16: 161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, E. 1933. Beth Shemesh in 1933. BASOR 52: 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, E. 1934. Rumeile: Being Ain Shems Excavations (Palestine), Part III (Biblical and Kindred Studies 5). Haverford.
   Google Scholar
• Haring, B. 2015. Halaḥam on an Ostracon of the Early New Kingdom? JNES 74: 189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Hayajneh, H. and Tropper, J. 1997. Die Genese des altsüdarabischen Alphabetes. UF 29: 183–198.
   Google Scholar
• Hillers, D.R. 1964. An Alphabetic Cuneiform Tablet from Taanach (TT 433). BASOR 173: 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hillers, D.R. 1970. A Reading in the Beth-Shemesh Tablet. BASOR 199: 66.
   Google Scholar
• Honeyman, A.M. 1952. The Letter-Order of the Semitic Alphabets in Africa and the Near East. Africa 22: 136–147. doi: 10.2307/1156240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, W., Oshima, T. and Sanders, S. 2006. Cuneiform in Canaan: Cuneiform Sources from the Land of Israel in Ancient Times. Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, A.K. and Beeston, F.L. 1988. New Evidence on the Qatabanian Letter Order. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 18: 35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Itkin, D., Geva-Kleinberger, A., Yaalon, D.H., Shaanan, U. and Goldfus, H. 2012. Nāri in the Levant: Historical and Etymological Aspects of a Specific Calcrete Formation. Earth Sciences History 31: 210–228. doi: 10.17704/eshi.31.2.5m8261038p3w1782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipiński, E. 1988. The Socio-Economic Condition of the Clergy in the Kingdom of Ugarit. In: Heltzer, M. and Lipiński, E., eds. Society and Economy in the Eastern Mediterranean, C. 1500–1000 B.C.: Proceedings of the International Symposium Held at the University of Haifa from the 28th of April to the 2nd of May, 1985 (OLA 23). Leuven: 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Loundine, A.G. 1987. L’abécédaire de Beth Shemesh. Le Muséon 100: 243–250. doi: 10.2143/MUS.100.1.2011448
   Google Scholar
• Naʾaman, N. and Goren, Y. 2009. The Inscriptions from the Egyptian Residence: A Reassessment. In: Gadot, Y. and Yadin, E., eds. Aphek-Antipatris II: The Remains on the Acropolis, The Moshe Kochavi and Pirhiya Beck Excavations (Monograph Series of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University 27). Tel Aviv: 443–455.
   Google Scholar
• Naveh, J. 1982. Early History of the Alphabet: An Introduction to West Semitic Epigraphy and Paleography. Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• Puech, É. 1986. Origine de l’alphabet. RB 93: 161–213.
   Google Scholar
• Puech, É. 1991. La tablette cunéiforme de Beth Shemesh, premier témoin de la séquence des lettres du Sud-Sémitique. In: Baurain, C., Bonnet, C. and Krings, V., eds. Phoinikeia Grammata: Lire et écrire en Méditerrannée: Actes du Colloque de Liège, 15–18 novembre 1989 (Studia Phoenicia; Collection d’etudes classiques 6). Liège-Namur: 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Ponikarov, V.P., Kazmin, V.G., Mikhailov, I.A., Kozlov, V.V., Sulidi-Kondratev, E.D., Mikhailov, K.Y., Faradzhev, V.A. and Mirzayev, K. 1966. The Geology of Syria, Explanatory Notes on the Geological Map of Syria, Scale 1:500,000 Vol. 1: Stratigraphy, Igneous Rocks & Tectonics. Damascus.
   Google Scholar
• Quack, J.F. 2003. Die spätägyptische Alphabetreihenfolge und das ‘südsemitische’ Alphabet. Lingua Aegyptia 11: 163–184.
   Google Scholar
• Ricou, L.E. 1971. Le croissant ophiolitique peri-arabe: une ceinture de nappes mise en place au Cretace superieur. Revue de Geographie Physique et Geologie Dynamique 13: 327–349.
   Google Scholar
• Ryckmans, J. 1981. L’ordre des lettres de l’alphabet sud-sémitique. Contribution à la question de l’origine de l’écriture. L’antiquité classique 50: 698–706. doi: 10.3406/antiq.1981.2044
   Google Scholar
• Ryckmans, J. 1988. A.G. Lundin’s Interpretation of the Beth Shemesh Abecedary: A Presentation and Commentary. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 18: 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Sass, B. 1991. The Beth Shemesh Tablet and the Early History of the Proto-Canaanite, Cuneiform and South Semitic Alphabet. UF 23: 315–326.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, T. 2018. A Double Abecedary? Halaḥam and ʾAbgad on the TT99 Ostracon. BASOR 379: 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Sneh, A. 2010. Geological Map of Israel 1:50,000, Bet Shemesh, Sheet 11–I. Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• Sneh, A., Bar tov, Y., Weissbrod, T. and Rosensaft, M. 1997. Geological Map of Israel, 1:200,000. Jerusalem
   Google Scholar
• Virolleaud, C. 1960. L’alphabet sénestrogyre de Ras-Shamra (Ugarit). Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 104: 85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Virolleaud, C. and Dussaud, R. 1934. Nouvelles archéologiques. Syria 15: 103–104.
   Google Scholar
• Whitechurch, H., Juteau, H.T. and Montigny, R. 1996. Role of Eastern Mediterranean Ophiolites (Turkey, Syria, Cyprus) in the History of the Neo-Tethys. In: Dixon, J.E. and Robertson, A.H.F., eds. The Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. Oxford: 301–317.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J.C. 2008. Statistical Analysis of Widths and Heights of Fingerprint Images in Terms of Ages from Segmentation Data, October 15, 2008. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.nist.gov/document/fingersizeagepdf
   Google Scholar
• Yeivin, S. 1945. An Ugaritic Inscription from Palestine. Kedem: Studies in Jewish Archaeology 2: 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Yogev, J. and Yona, S. 2014. Epigraphic Notes on KTU 6.1. UF 45: 313–317.
   Google Scholar