LocalGLMnet: interpretable deep learning for tabular data

References

• Agarwal R., Frosst N., Zhang X., Caruana R. & Hinton G. E. (2020). Neural additive models: interpretable machine learning with neural nets. arXiv:2004.13912v1.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn J., Lu Y., Oh R., Park K. & Zhu D. (2021). Neural credibility [conference presentation]. In Virtual 24th International Congress on Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, July 5–10.  Urbana-Champaign, USA: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Apley D. W. & Zhu J. (2020). Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 82(4), 1059–1086.
   Google Scholar
• Arik S. Ö & Pfister T. (2019). TabNet: attentive interpretable tabular learning. arXiv:1908.07442v5.
   Google Scholar
• Bahdanau D., Cho K. & Bengio Y. (2014). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv:1409.0473.
   Google Scholar
• Barndorff-Nielsen O. (2014). Information and exponential families: in statistical theory. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C., Li O., Tao C., Barnett A., Su J. & Rudin C. (2019). This looks like that: deep learning for interpretable image recognition. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Delong Ł. & Kozak A. (2021). The use of autoencoders for training neural networks with mixed categorical and numerical features. SSRN Manuscript ID 3952470.
   Google Scholar
• Dutang C. & Charpentier A. (2018). CASdatasets R Package Vignette. Reference Manual. Version 1.0-8, packaged 2018-05-20.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrmeir L. & Tutz G. (1994). Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models. New York, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics29(5), 1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodfellow I., Bengio Y. & Courville A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ha D., Dai A. & Le Q. (2016). Hypernetworks. arXiv:1609.09106.
   Google Scholar
• He K., Zhang X., Ren S. & Sun J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vol. 1, P. 770–778. Las Vegas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Huang X., Khetan A., Cvitkovic M. & Karnin Z. (2020). TabTransformer: tabular data modeling using contextual embeddings. arXiv:2012.00678.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen B. (1997). The theory of dispersion models. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo K. (2019). Generative synthesis of insurance datasets. arXiv:1912.02423v2.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo K. & Richman R. (2021). Embeddings and attention in predictive modeling. arXiv:2104.03545v1.
   Google Scholar
• Kursa M. & Rudnicki W. (2010). Feature selection with the Boruta package. Journal of Statistical Software 36, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemhadri I., Ruan F., Abraham L. & Tibshirani R. (2021). LassoNet: a neural network with feature sparsity. Journal of Machine Learning Research 22, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorentzen C. & Mayer M. (2020). Peeking into the black box: an actuarial case study for interpretable machine learning. SSRN Manuscript ID 3595944. Version May 7, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg S. M. & Lee S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 30, Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., Garnett, R. (eds.), Montreal: Curran Associates. P. 4765–4774.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh P. & Nelder J. A. (1983). Generalized linear models. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Merz M., Richman R., Tsanakas A. & Wüthrich M. V. (2022). Interpreting deep learning models with marginal attribution by conditioning on quantiles, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelder J. A. & Wedderburn R. W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 135(3), 370–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noll A., Salzmann R. & Wüthrich M. V. (2018). Case study: french motor third-party liability claims. SSRN Manuscript ID 3164764. Version March 4, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Perla F., Richman R., Scognamiglio S. & Wüthrich M. (2021). Time-series forecasting of mortality rates using deep learning. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2021(7), 572–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro M. T., Singh S. & Guestrin C. (2016). ‘Why should I trust you?’: explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD '16. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. P. 1135–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Richman R. (2020). AI in actuarial science – a review of recent advances – part 2. Annals of Actuarial Science 15(2), 230–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman R. (2021). Mind the gap – safely incorporating deep learning models into the actuarial toolkit. SSRN Manuscript ID 3857693.
   Google Scholar
• Richman R. & Wüthrich M. (2020). Nagging predictors. Risks 8, 83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudin C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence 1, 206–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundararajan M., Taly A. & Yan Q. (2017). Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, PMLR, Vol. 70, Sydney, Australia: International Convention Centre. P. 3319–3328.
   Google Scholar
• Tran M., Nguyen N., Nott D. & Kohn R. (2020). Bayesian deep net GLM and GLMM. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 29, 97–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaswani A., Shazeer N., Parmar N., Uszkoreit J., Jones L., Gomez A. N., Kaiser Ł. & Polosukhin I. (2017). Attention is all you need. arXiv:1706.03762v5.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan J., Sudjianto A., Brahimi E., Chen J. & Nair V. N. (2018). Explainable neural networks based on additive index models. arXiv:1806.01933v1.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q., Li B., Xiao T., Zhu J., Li C., Wong D. F. & Chao L. S. (2019). Learning deep transformer models for machine translation. arXiv:1906.01787.
   Google Scholar
• Wüthrich M. V. (2020). Bias regularization in neural network models for general insurance pricing. European Actuarial Journal 10(1), 179–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüthrich M. V. & Merz M. (2021). Statistical foundations of actuarial learning and its applications. SSRN Manuscript ID 3822407.
   Google Scholar