Isotonic recalibration under a low signal-to-noise ratio

References

• Ayer, M., Brunk, H. D., Ewing, G. M., Reid, W. T. & Silverman, E. (1955). An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 26, 641–647.
   Google Scholar
• Balabdaoui, F., Durot, C. & Jankowski, H. (2019). Least squares estimation in the monotone single index model. Bernoulli 25, 3276–3310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Brenner, J. M. & Brunk, H. D. (1972). Statistical inference under order restrictions. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, R. E. & Brunk, H. D. (1972). The isotonic regression problem and its dual. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67(337), 140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blier-Wong, C., Lamontagne, L. & Marceau, E. (2022). A representation-learning approach for insurance pricing with images. Insurance Data Science Conference, 15–17 June 2022, Milan.
   Google Scholar
• Brunk, H. D., Ewing, G. M. & Utz, W. R. (1957). Minimizing integrals in certain classes of monotone functions. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 7, 833–847.
   Google Scholar
• Busing, F. M. T. A. (2022). Monotone regression: a simple and fast O(n) PAVA implementation. Journal of Statistical Software 102, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, J., Hornik, K. & Mair, P. (2009). Isotone optimization in R: pool-adjacent-violators algorithm (PAVA) and active set methods. Journal of Statistical Software 32(5), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denuit, M., Charpentier, A. & Trufin, J. (2021). Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for insurance pricing with machine learning. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 101, 485–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, T., Dümbgen, L., Henzi, A., Puke, M. & Ziegel, J. (2022). Honest calibration assessment for binary outcome predictions. arXiv:2203.04065.
   Google Scholar
• Dutang, C. & Charpentier, A. (2018). CASdatasets R Package Vignette. Reference Manual. Version 1.0-8, packaged 2018-05-20.
   Google Scholar
• Gneiting, T. (2011). Making and evaluating point forecasts. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106(494), 746–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneiting, T. & Resin, J. (2022). Regression diagnostics meets forecast evaluation: conditional calibration, reliability diagrams and coefficient of determination. arXiv:2108.03210v3.
   Google Scholar
• Henzi, A., Kleger, G.-R. & Ziegel, J. F. (2023). Distributional (single) index models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 118(541), 489–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henzi, A., Ziegel, J. F. & Gneiting, T. (2021). Isotonic distributional regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 83, 963–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W. & Lemeshow, S. (1980). Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 9, 1043–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karush, W. (1939). Minima of functions of several variables with inequalities as side constraints [MSc thesis]. Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P. & Welling, M. (2019). An introduction to variational autoencoders. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning 12(4), 307–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger, F. & Ziegel, J. F. (2021). Generic conditions for forecast dominance. Journal of Business & Economics Statistics 39(4), 972–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29, 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, H. W. & Tucker, A. W. (1951). Nonlinear programming. Proceedings of 2nd Berkeley Symposium. University of California Press. P. 481–492.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholm, M., Lindskog, F. & Palmquist, J. (2023). Local bias adjustment, duration-weighted probabilities, and automatic construction of tariff cells. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, published online: 14 Feb 2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, C. (1999). Local regression and likelihood. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30. Guyon, I., Luxburg, U.V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., Garnett, R. (Eds.). Curran Associates. P. 4765–4774.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., Meier, D. & Wüthrich, M. V. (2023). SHAP for actuaries: explain any model. SSRN Manuscript ID 4389797.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, A. K., Jiang, X., Vembu, S., Elkan, C. & Ohno-Machado, L. (2012). Predicting accurate probabilities with ranking loss. ICML'12: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning. Omnipress, 2600 Anderson Street, Madison, WI, United States P. 659–666.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. & Woodroofe, M. (2000). On the degrees of freedom in shape-restricted regression. Annals of Statistics 28(4), 1083–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E. (1959). The complete amalgamation into blocks, by weighted means, of a finite set of real numbers. Biometrika 46, 317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. H. (1973). A new vector partition of the probability score. Journal of Applied Meteorology 12(4), 595–600.
   Google Scholar
• Peiris, H., Jeong, H. & Kim, J.-K. (2023). Integration of traditional and telematics data for efficient insurance claims prediction. SSRN Manuscript ID 4344952.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, L. J. (1971). Elicitable of personal probabilities and expectations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66(336), 783–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schervish, M. J. (1989). A general method of comparing probability assessors. The Annals of Statistics 17(4), 1856–1879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasche, D. (2021). Calibrating sufficiently. Statistics: A Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 55(6), 1356–1386.
   Google Scholar
• Therneau, T. M. & Atkinson, E. J. (2022). An introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART routines. R Vignettes, version of October 21, 2022. Rochester: Mayo Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. J., Hoefling, H. & Tibshirani, R. (2011). Nearly-isotonic regression. Technometrics 53(1), 54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüthrich, M. V. (2023). Model selection with Gini indices under auto-calibration. European Actuarial Journal 13(1), 469–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüthrich, M. V. & Merz, M. (2023). Statistical foundations of actuarial learning and its applications. Springer Actuarial.
   Google Scholar
• Zadrozny, B. & Elkan, C. (2002). Transforming classifier scores into accurate multiclass probability estimates. Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.  Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United State P. 694–699.
   Google Scholar