Responsibility, trust and gender in the economic decision-making of peasant households: enclosure in Southwest Finland 1760–1820

References

• Ågren, M. (2009). Domestic secrets: Women and property in Sweden 1600–1857. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ågren, M. (2013). ‘His estate’ – or hers? Three chapters in the history of married women’s property rights in Sweden, 1350–1850. Gender & History, 25(2), 211–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.12014
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R. C. (1999). Tracking the agricultural revolution in England. Economic History Review, 52(2), 209–235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0289.00123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, G. (2001). Gender as symbolic capital? Women and property in the 17th and 18th centuries. In M. Ågren, Å Karlsson, & X. Rousseaux (Eds.), Guises of power: Integration of society and legitimisation of power in Sweden and the southern Low countries ca 1500–1900 (pp. 23–31). Uppsala: Department of History, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, K. (1984). Bondeopposition och bondeinflytande under frihetstiden: Centralmakten och östgötaböndernas reaktioner i näringspolitiska frågor. Stockholm: LTs förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Cederbom, C. (2020). Married women in legal practice: Agency and norms in the Swedish realm, 1350–1450. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, G. (1998). Commons sense: Common property rights, efficiency, and institutional change. The Journal of Economic History, 58(1), 73–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700019896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Moor, M., Shaw-Taylor, L., & Warde, P. (2002). Comparing the historical commons of north west Europe: An introduction. In M. De Moor, L. Shaw-Taylor, & P. Warde (Eds.), The management of common land in north west Europe, c. 1500–1850 (pp. 15–31). Turnhout: Brepols.
   Google Scholar
• Dübeck, I. (2005). Property and authority in Danish marital law. In M. Ågren, & A. L. Erickson (Eds.), The Marital economy in Scandinavia and Britain 1400–1900 (pp. 127–139). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, C., Thoen, E., & Williamson, T. (2018). The rationale of open fields: A collection of essays. In C. Dyer, E. Thoen, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Peasants and their fields: The rationale of open-field agriculture, c. 700–1800 (pp. 1–4). Turnhout: Brepols.
   Google Scholar
• Eilola, J. (2002). “Cuckoi päällä curjanakin; cana alla armaisnakin”: Patriarkaalisuus, puolisoiden välinen suhde ja auktoriteetin muodostuminen. In P. Einonen, & P. Karonen (Eds.), Arjen valta: Suomalaisen yhteiskunnan patriarkaalisesta järjestyksestä myöhäiskeskiajalta teollistumisen kynnykselle (v. 1450–1860) (pp. 100–127). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, A. L. (2005). The marital economy in comparative perspective. In M. Ågren, & A. L. Erickson (Eds.), The Marital economy in Scandinavia and Britain 1400–1900 (pp. 3–20). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Falvey, H. (2013). Marking the boundaries: William Jordan’s 1633 pre-enclosure survey of Duffield Frith (Derbyshire). The Agricultural History Review, 61(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fiebranz, R. (2003). “Mitt bördehemman” eller “vårt ärvda skattehemman”? Genusanknutna strategier vid överlåtelser av skattejord mellan generationer, Bjuråker 1750–1850. In M. Ågren (Ed.), Hans och hennes: Genus och egendom i Sverige från vikingatiden till nutid (pp. 219–239). Uppsala: Historiska institutionen, Uppsala universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, B. (1999). Common recollections: Resisting enclosure “by agreement” in seventeenth-century England. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 3(2), 75–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021908617069
   Google Scholar
• Gadd, C.-J. (2000). Det svenska jordbrukets historia: Den agrara revolutionen 1700–1870. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur/LTs förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan Jansson, K., Fiebranz, R., & Östman, A.-C. (2017). Constitutive tasks: Performances of hierarchy and identity. In M. Ågren (Ed.), Making a living, making a difference: Gender and work in early modern European society (pp. 127–158). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemminki, T. (2012). Långa listor med fordringar och skulder: Om förtroendeförhållanden i Ilmola och Nordmaling i början av 1800-talet. Historisk Tidskrift för Finland, 97(3), 375–403.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, P. (2001). Peasant society and the perception of a moral economy: Redistribution and risk aversion in traditional peasant culture. Scandinavian Journal of History, 26(4), 271–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/034687501317155095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, H. M. (2004). Widowhood in Scandinavia – an introduction. Scandinavian Journal of History, 29(3–4), 171–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03468750410008798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokiaho, M. (2002). Miehen kunnia ja maine 1600-luvun pohjalaisessa maalaisyhteisössä. In P. Einonen, & P. Karonen (Eds.), Arjen valta: Suomalaisen yhteiskunnan patriarkaalisesta järjestyksestä myöhäiskeskiajalta teollistumisen kynnykselle (v. 1450–1860) (pp. 203–220). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. M. (2016). Agricultural enlightenment: Knowledge, technology, and nature, 1750–1840. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jutikkala, E. (1958). Suomen talonpojan historia. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson Sjögren, Å, & Lindström, P. (2004). Widows, ownership and political culture: Sweden 1650–1800. Scandinavian Journal of History, 29(3-4), 241–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03468750410003757
   Google Scholar
• Kingston-Mann, E. (2018). Women, land rights, and rural development: How much land does a woman need?. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kotilainen, S. (2012). Förtroende och andra former av symboliskt kapital i fadderskapsstrategier. Historisk Tidskrift för Finland, 97(3), 295–326.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, K. (2020). Maatalous, isojako ja talonpoikainen päätöksenteko Lounais-Suomessa 1750–1850 [Doctoral dissertation, University of Turku]. UTUPub. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-69213-2-7
   Google Scholar
• Lilieqvist, J. (2002). Käänteinen vaimokuri: Diskurssi avioliittoon kuuluvasta miehisyydestä, vallasta ja auktoriteetistä Ruotsissa uskonpuhdistuksesta 1800-luvun alkuun. In P. Einonen, & P. Karonen (Eds.), Arjen valta: Suomalaisen yhteiskunnan patriarkaalisesta järjestyksestä myöhäiskeskiajalta teollistumisen kynnykselle (v. 1450–1860) (pp. 73–99). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, J., Hassan Jansson, K., Fiebranz, R., Jacobsson, B., & Ågren, M. (2017). Mistress or maid: The structure of women’s work in Sweden, 1550–1800. Continuity and Change, 32(2), 225–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416017000200
   Google Scholar
• Ling, S., Hassan Jansson, K., Lennersand, M., Pihl, C., & Ågren, M. (2017). Marriage and work: Intertwined sources of agency and authority. In M. Ågren (Ed.), Making a living, making a difference: Gender and work in early modern European society (pp. 80–102). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lövkrona, I. (2001). Hierarki och makt: Genusperspektiv på arbetsdelningen i det tidigmoderna hushållet. In B. Liljewall, K. Niskanen, & M. Sjöberg (Eds.), Kvinnor och jord: Arbete och ägande från medeltid till nutid (pp. 31–44). Stockholm: Nordiska museet.
   Google Scholar
• Lundh, C., & Olsson, M. (2002). The institution of retirement on Scanian estates in the nineteenth century. Continuity and Change, 17(3), 373–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416002004393
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonagh, B. (2018). Elite women and the agricultural landscape, 1700–1830. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, B. A. K. (2009). Women, enclosure and estate improvement in eighteenth-century Northamptonshire. Rural History, 20(2), 143–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956793309990021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moring, B. (2010). Rural widows, economy and co-residence in the 18th and 19th centuries. History of the Family, 15(3), 239–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moring, B., & Wall, R. (2017). Widows in European economy and society, 1600–1920. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogilvie, S. (2003). A bitter living: Women, markets, and social capital in early modern Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, J., & Nummela, I. (2018). Feeding economic growth: Agriculture. In Z. Varga, & A. Halmesvirta (Eds.), Agriculture and rural life in Finland and Hungary (pp. 9–30). Loimaa: Sarka – the Finnish Museum of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, M., & Svensson, P. (2010). Agricultural growth and institutions: Sweden, 1700–1860. European Review of Economic History, 14(2), 275–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1361491610000067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östman, A.-C. (2000). Mjölk och jord: Om kvinnlighet, manlighet och arbete i ett österbottniskt jordbrukssamhälle ca 1870–1940. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Förlag – Åbo Akademi University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overton, M. (1996). Agricultural revolution in England: The transformation of the agrarian economy 1500–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piilahti, K.-M. (2007). Aineellista ja aineetonta turvaa: Ruokakunnat, ekologis-taloudelliset resurssit ja kontaktinmuodostus Valkealassa 1630–1750. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, A. (1990). Puoli vuodetta, lukot ja avaimet: Nainen ja maalaistalous oikeuskäytännön valossa 1660–1710. Helsinki: Lakimiesliiton kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Pylkkänen, A. (2005). Forming the marital economy in the early modern Finnish countryside. In M. Ågren, & A. L. Erickson (Eds.), The Marital economy in Scandinavia and Britain 1400–1900 (pp. 75–88). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Renes, H. (2018). “[…]this made the countrie to remayne champion, and without enclosures or hedging”: open-field landscapes and research in the Netherlands and in Europe. In C. Dyer, E. Thoen, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Peasants and their fields: The rationale of open-field agriculture, c. 700–1800 (pp. 121–161). Turnhout: Brepols.
   Google Scholar
• Saarenheimo, J. (2003). Isojako. In V. Rasila, E. Jutikkala, & A. Mäkelä-Alitalo (Eds.), Suomen maatalouden historia, osa 1: Perinteisen maatalouden aika esihistoriasta 1870-luvulle (pp. 349–364). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik, H. (2005). Decision-making on marital property in Norway, 1500–1800. In M. Ågren, & A. L. Erickson (Eds.), The Marital economy in Scandinavia and Britain 1400–1900 (pp. 111–126). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sogner, S., Lindstedt Cronberg, M., & Sandvik, H. (2000). Women in court. In E. Österberg, & S. Sogner (Eds.), People meet the law: Control and conflict-handling in the courts. The Nordic countries in the post-Reformation and pre-industrial period (pp. 167–201). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, L. (2016). The Limits of Patriarchy: How female networks of pilring and gossip sparked the first depates on rural gender rights in the 19th-century Finnish-language press. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Talvitie, P. (2018). Open-field farming in Finland. In C. Dyer, E. Thoen, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Peasants and their fields: The rationale of open-field agriculture, c. 700–1800 (pp. 99–119). Turnhout: Brepols.
   Google Scholar
• Toivanen, J. (2005). Lesken elämää: Leskeys naisen elämän osana ja sosiokulttuurisena ilmiönä 1700-luvun lopun sisäsuomalaisella maaseudulla [Licentiate thesis, University of Jyväskylä]. JYX Digital Repository. https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/12144
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (1986). English open fields and enclosures: Retardation or productivity improvements. The Journal of Economic History, 46(3), 669–692. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700046829
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, M., Schmidt, A., & Wall, R. (2007). Broken families: Economic resources and social networks of women who head families. The History of the Family, 12(4), 223–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2007.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Velková, A. (2010). Women between a new marriage and an independent position: Rural widows in Bohemia in the first half of the nineteenth century. History of the Family, 15(3), 255–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hisfam.2010.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilkuna, K. H. J. (2014). Viina miehen mitta: Vapaa-ajalla rakennettu miehekkyys 1550–1850. In P. Markkola, A.-C. Östman, & M. Lamberg (Eds.), Näkymätön sukupuoli: Mieheyden pitkä historia (pp. 92–113). Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar