The impact of rereading on older adults’ comprehension and metacomprehension of negative text

References

• Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X010002014
   Google Scholar
• Buchweitz, A., Mason, R. A., Tomitch, L. M. B., & Just, M. A. (2009). Brain activation for reading and listening comprehension: An fMRI study of modality effects and individual differences in language comprehension. Psychology & Neuroscience, 2(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2009.2.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Romanò, M. (2005). Updating in working memory: A comparison of good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, W. G., & Clark, H. H. (1971). Semantics in the perception of verticality. British Journal of Psychology, 62(3), 311–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1974). Perceptual coding strategies in the formation and verification of descriptions. Memory & Cognition, 2(1), 101–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cornish, E. R. (1971). Pragmatic aspects of negation in sentence evaluation and completion tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1971.tb02065.x
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, E. R., & Wason, P. C. (1970). The recall of affirmative and negative sentences in an incidental learning task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22(2), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335557043000032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371-80-90312-6
   Google Scholar
• De Beni, R., Borella, E., & Carretti, B. (2007). Reading comprehension in aging: The role of working memory and metacomprehension. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 14(2), 189–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beni, R., & Palladino, P. (2004). Decline in working memory updating through ageing: Intrusion error analyses. Memory (Hove, England), 12(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, S., D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2013). Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0367-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. F. (1951). How to test readability.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, L. (1987). Interpretative acts: Cognition and the construction of discourse. Poetics, 16(2), 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2000). Differential roles for visuospatial and verbal working memory in situation model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., Rissman, J., & D’esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience, 8(10), 1298–1300. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K., & Alkabets-Zlozover, I. (2007). Negation in context: A functional approach to suppression. Discourse processes, 43(2), 153–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glisky, E. L. (2007). Changes in cognitive function in human aging. Brain aging, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B. (1965). Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4(2), 107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Zwaan, R. A. (1995). Inference generation and the construction of situation models. Discourse Comprehension: Essays in Honor of Walter Kintsch, 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., & Zachs, R. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new review. In G. H. Bower, (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, U., & Glucksberg, S. (2006). Does understanding negation entail affirmation?: An examination of negated metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1015–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzog, C., & Hultsch, D. F. (2000). Metacognition in adulthood and old age. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 417–466). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hoosain, R. (1973). The processing of negation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(6), 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371-73-80041-6
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1971). Comprehension of negation with quantification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371-71-80051-8
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaup, B. (2001). Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory and Cognition, 29(7), 960–967. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaup, B., Dijkstra, K., & Ludtke, J. (2004). Resolving anaphors after reading negative sentences [Paper presentation]. 44th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Kaup, B., Ludtke, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Effects of negation, truth value, and delay on picture recognition after reading affirmative and negative sentences. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kaup, B., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemtes, K. A., & Kemper, S. (1999). Aging and resolution of quantifier scope effects. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54(6), P350–P360. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.6.P350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, L. L. (1988). Language and aging: Competence versus performance. In J. E. Birren & V. L. Bengston (Eds.), Emergent theories of aging (pp. 177–213). Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, J., Friedrich, C. K., De Filippis, M., & Kaup, B. (2008). Event-related potential correlates of negation in a sentence–picture verification paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(8), 1355–1370. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., & Just, M. A. (1989). Changes in activation levels with negation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(4), 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J. (2013). Can bold typeface improve readers’ comprehension and metacomprehension of negation? Reading Psychology, 34(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2011.626107
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J. (2015). Older adults’ comprehension of transformational and deactivation negation. Educational Gerontology, 41(8), 604–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J. (2018). Cognitively active older adults’ comprehension and metacomprehension of negated text. Experimental Aging Research, 44(4), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2018.1475154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J., & Abrams, L. (2009). Not may not be too difficult: The effects of negation on older adults’ sentence comprehension. Educational Gerontology, 35(4), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270802505624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J., & Brackins, T. (2020). Comprehension and metacomprehension of negated text: Is retrieval practice beneficial for understanding? Written Language and Literacy, 23(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00034.mar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J., & Brackins, T. (2021). I’m not crying, you’re crying: An evaluation of the impact of emotional text on negation comprehension. Reading Psychology, 42(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1887018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J., & Hover, P. A. (2011). Metacomprehension and negation: Assessing readers’ awareness of the difficulty of negated text. Reading Psychology, 32(2), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711003608121
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, S. J., & Snyder, N. (2018). It may not be that difficult the second time around: The effects of rereading on the comprehension and metacomprehension of negated text. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Drifting from slow to “d’oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C., D’Mello, S. K., & Kopp, K. (2015). The influence of consequence value and text difficulty on affect, attention, and learning while reading instructional texts. Learning and Instruction, 40, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95(1), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, S., Kemper, S., & Kynette, D. (1992). Adults’ reading comprehension: Effects of syntactic complexity and working memory. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47, 258–P265. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/47.4.P258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D. C., & Festini, S. B. (2017). Theories of memory and aging: A look at the past and a glimpse of the future. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 72(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw066
   Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A., Atkinson, T. M., & Berish, D. E. (2003). Executive functioning as a potential mediator of age-related cognitive decline in normal adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 566. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurer, T., Opitz, B., & Schubert, T. (2020). Working memory capacity but not prior knowledge impact on readers’ attention and text comprehension. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00026
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, M. A. (1973). Bound to be easier? The negative prefix and sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371-73-80062-3
   Google Scholar
• Sung, J. E. (2017). Age-related decline in case-marker processing and its relation to working memory capacity. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(5), 813–820. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X-89-90040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Lakey, C. E., & Young, D. L. (2010). Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive control and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation. Intelligence, 38(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2001). Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 16(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar