Advances in Polymeric Nanofiltration Membrane: A Review

References

• Muntha, S.T.; Kausar A.; Siddiq M. Progress on polymer-based membranes in gas separation technology. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2016. doi:10.1080/03602559.2016.1163592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntha, S.T.; Kausar A.; Siddiq M. A review on zeolite reinforced polymeric membranes: salient features and applications. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2016. doi:10.1080/03602559.2016.1185631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begum, S.; Kausar, A.; Ullah, H.; Siddiq, M. Potential of polyvinylidene flouride/carbon nanotube composite in energy, electronics and membrane technology: an overview. Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 2016. doi:10.1080/03602559.2016.1185630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J.Q.; Zhou, Z.; Sharma, V.K. Occurrence, transportation, monitoring and treatment of emerging micro-pollutants in waste water-a review from global views. Microchem. J. 2013, 110, 292–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai, A.K.; Giri, A. Swelling dynamics of a macromolecular hydrophilic network and evaluation of its potential for controlled release of agrochemicals. React. Funct. Polym. 2006, 53, 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, M.F.; Abbas, S. A review of methods for the demetallization of residual fuel oils. Fuel. Process. Technol. 2006, 87, 573–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, J.; Malhotra, D.; Gautam, S.; Gupta, M.N. Green synthesis of nanocomposites consisting of silver and protease alpha chymotrypsin. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2013, 20, 1054–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minjing, Z.; Gang, L.; Qiang, W.; Hualei, C.; Ling, L. Preparation of porous TiO2/Ti composite membrane for immunoisolation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 2256–2258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignati, D.A.L.; Camusso, M.; Dominik, J. Estimation of the truly dissolved concentrations of Cd, Cu, Ni, and Zn in contrasting aquatic environments with a simple empirical model. Ecol. Model. 2005, 184, 125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raoufi, N.; Surre, F.; Rajarajan, M.; Sun, T.; Grattan, K.T. Optical sensor for pH monitoring using a layer-by-layer deposition technique emphasizing enhanced stability and re-usability. Sens. Actuator B. Chem. 2014, 195, 692–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana, D.; Matsuura, T. Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2448–2471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.; van der Bruggen, B. The use of nanoparticles in polymeric and ceramic membrane structures: review of manufacturing procedures and performance improvement for water treatment. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 2335–2349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimpour, A.; Madaeni, S.S.; Taheri, A.H.; Mansourpanah, Y. Coupling TiO2 nanoparticles with UV irradiation for modification of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2008, 313, 158–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aroon, M.A.; Ismail, A.F.; Montazer-Rahmati, M.M.; Matsuura, T. Effect of chitosan as a functionalization agent on the performance and separation properties of polyimide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix flat sheet membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2010, 364, 309–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J.H.; Jegal, J.; Kim, W.N.; Choi, H.S. Incorporation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes into poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes for use in the pervaporation of water/ethanol mixtures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 111, 2186–2193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, J.; Su, Y.; Shi, Q.; Chen, W.; Jiang, Z. Protein fouling resistant membrane prepared by amphiphilic pegylated polyethersulfone. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 2289–2295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M.; Su, Y.; Mu, C.; Jiang, Z. Improved antifouling property of PES ultrafiltration membranes using additive of silica−PVP nanocomposite. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 49, 790–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M.; Trägårdh, G.; Östergren, K. The influence of pH, salt and temperature on nanofiltration performance. J. Membrane Sci. 2008, 312, 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boributh, S.; Chanachai, A.; Jiraratananon, R. Modification of PVDF membrane by chitosan solution for reducing protein fouling. J. Membrane Sci. 2009, 342, 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razmjou, A.; Mansouri, J.; Chen, V. The effects of mechanical and chemical modification of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface chemistry, structure and fouling performance of PES ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2011, 378, 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obaid, M.; Tolba, G.M.; Motlak, M.; Fadali, O.A.; Khalil, K.A.; Almajid, A.A.; Barakat, N.A. Effective polysulfone-amorphous SiO2 NPs electrospun nanofiber membrane for high flux oil/water separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 279, 631–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, Y.; Hellgardt, K.; Wakeman, R.J. Enhanced permeability of polyaniline based nano-membranes for gas separation. J. Membrane Sci. 2006, 282, 60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurekli, Y. Removal of heavy metals in wastewater by using zeolitenano-particles impregnated polysulfone membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 309, 53–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrijenhoek, E.M.; Hong, S.; Elimelech, M. Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2001, 188, 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, X.; Bian, X.; Shi, L. Preparation and characterization of NF composite membrane. J. Membrane Sci. 2002, 210, 3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal, R.; Kaur, S.; Ma, Z.; Chan, C.; Ramakrishna, S.; Matsuura, T. Electrospun nanofibrous filtration membrane. J. Membrane Sci. 2006, 281, 581–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linggawati, A.; Mohammad, A.W.; Ghazali, Z. Effect of electron beam irradiation on morphology and sieving characteristics of nylon-66 membranes. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 2797–2804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H.M.; Wei, J.F.; Wang, X.L. Nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with high charge density prepared by simultaneous electron beam radiation-induced graft polymerization for removal of Cr (VI). Desalination 2014, 346, 122–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, C.; Nguyen, Q.T.; Ping, Z. Surface modification of cardo polyetherketone ultrafiltration membrane by photo-grafted copolymers to obtain nanofiltration membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2007, 295, 88–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajimi, R.H.; Ferjani, E.; Roudesli, M.S.; Deratani, A. Effect of LBL surface modification on characteristics and performances of cellulose acetate nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2011, 266, 78–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeki, D.; Imanishi, M.; Ohmukai, Y.; Maruyama, T.; Matsuyama, H. Stabilization of layer-by-layer assembled nanofiltration membranes by crosslinking via amide bond formation and siloxane bond formation. J. Membrane Sci. 2013, 447, 128–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, L.Y.; Mohammad, A.W.; Ng, C..; Leo, C.P.; Rohani, R. Development of nanofiltration membrane with high salt selectivity and performance stability using polyelectrolyte multilayers. Desalination 2014, 351, 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E.S.; Yu, Q.; Deng, B. Plasma surface modification of nanofiltration (NF) thin-film composite (TFC) membranes to improve anti organic fouling. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 9863–9871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonomenna, M.G.; Lopez, L.C.; Davoli, M.; Favia, P.; d’Agostino, R.; Drioli, E. Polymeric membranes modified via plasma for nanofiltration of aqueous solution containing organic compounds. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 120, 147–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, F.; Ma, F.; Zheng, W.; Zhao, Z.; Zheng, L. Visual detection of the human metapneumovirus using reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification with hydroxynaphthol blue dye. Virol. J. 2012, 9, 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X.; Dong, Y.; Su, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Jiang, Z. Improved performance of composite nanofiltration membranes by adding calcium chloride in aqueous phase during interfacial polymerization process. J. Membrane Sci. 2014, 452, 90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daraei, P.; Madaeni, S.S.; Ghaemi, N.; Salehi, E.; Khadivi, M.A.; Moradian, R.; Astinchap, B. Novel polyethersulfone nanocomposite membrane prepared by PANI/Fe3O4 nanoparticles with enhanced performance for Cu(II) removal from water. J. Membrane Sci. 2012, 415, 250–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Bruggen, B.; Mänttäri, M.; Nyström, M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63, 251–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Amoudi, A.S. Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: a review. Desalination 2010, 259, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley-Radcliffe, D.L.; Williams, S.R.; Barrow, M.S.; Williams, P.M. Critical appraisal of current nanofiltration modelling strategies for seawater desalination and further insights on dielectric exclusion. Desalination 2014, 343, 154–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilal, N.; Al-Zoubi, H.; Darwish, N.A.; Mohamma, A.W.; Arabi, M.A. A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes: treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy. Desalination 2004, 170(3), 281–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, J.; Wan, Y. Effects of pH and salt on nanofiltration—a critical review. J. Membrane Sci. 2013, 438, 18–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deen, W.M. Hindered transport of large molecules in liquid-filled pores. ALChE J. 1987, 33, 1409–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Bruggen, B. Chemical modification of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes: a review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 114, 630–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, W.J.; Ismail, A.F. Polymeric nanofiltration membranes for textile dye wastewater treatment: preparation, performance evaluation, transport modelling, and fouling control—a review. Desalination 2009, 245, 321–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C.Y.; Chong, T.H.; Fane, A.G. Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164, 126–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Y.; Bian, L.; Bi, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, X. Evaluation of the pore size distribution of a forward osmosis membrane in three different ways. J. Membrane Sci. 2014, 454, 390–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.J.; Al Malek, S.A.; Al-Rashdi, B.A.M.; Hilal, N. Atomic force microscopy of nanofiltration membranes: effect of imaging mode and environment. J. Membrane Sci. 2012, 389, 486–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Martín, N.; Silva, V.; Carmona, F.J.; Palacio, L.; Hernández, A.; Prádanos, P. Pore size analysis from retention of neutral solutes through nanofiltration membranes. The contribution of concentration–polarization. Desalination 2014, 344, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, H.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, S. Preparation of microporous polyamide networks for carbon dioxide capture and nanofiltration. Polymer 2013, 54, 557–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misdan, N.; Lau, W.J.; Ismail, A.F.; Matsuura, T.; Rana, D. Study on the thin film composite poly (piperazine-amide) nanofiltration membrane: Impacts of physicochemical properties of substrate on interfacial polymerization formation. Desalination 2014, 344, 198–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, D.L.; Llenas, L.; Aljohani, N.H.; Williams, P.M.; Martínez-Lladó, X.; Rovira, M.; de Pablo, J. Investigation of the dielectric properties of nanofiltration membranes. Desalinatio 2013, 315, 100–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, S. A novel highly permeable positively charged nanofiltration membrane based on a nanoporous hyper-crosslinked polyamide barrier layer. J. Membrane Sci. 2013, 448, 180–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stawikowska, J.; Livingston, A.G. Assessment of atomic force microscopy for characterisation of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2013, 425, 58–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiso, Y.; Muroshige, K.; Oguchi, T.; Hirose, M.; Ohara, T.; Shintani, T. Pore radius estimation based on organic solute molecular shape and effects of pressure on pore radius for a reverse osmosis membrane. J. Membrane Sci. 2011, 369, 290–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A.L.; Maugeri, F.; Silva, V.; Hernández, A.; Palacio, L.; Pradanos, P. AFM analysis of the surface of nanoporous membranes: application to the nanofiltration of potassium clavulanate. J. Matter. Sci. 2011, 46, 3356–3369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Székely, G.; Bandarra, J.; Heggie, W.; Sellergren, B.; Ferreira, F.C. A hybrid approach to reach stringent low genotoxic impurity contents in active pharmaceutical ingredients: combining molecularly imprinted polymers and organic solvent nanofiltration for removal of 1,3-diisopropylurea. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 86, 79–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, M.B.; van der Bruggen, B.; Negrin, Z.R.; Alconero, P.L. Separation of a high-value pharmaceutical compound from waste ethanol by nanofiltration. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 18, 1635–1641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.F.; Székely, G.; Valtcheva, I.B.; Livingston, A.G. Increasing the sustainability of membrane processes through cascade approach and solvent recovery—pharmaceutical purification case study. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siew, W.E.; Livingston, A.G.; Ates, C.; Merschaert, A. Molecular separation with an organic solvent nanofiltration cascade–augmenting membrane selectivity with process engineering. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 90, 299–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotoft, L.F.; Christensen, K..; Andrésen, R.; Norddahl, B. Full scale plant with membrane based concentration of blackcurrant juice on the basis of laboratory and pilot scale tests. Chem. Eng. Process, 2012, 54, 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sereewatthanawut, I.; Baptista, I.I.R.; Boam, A.T.; Hodgson, A.; Livingston, A.G. Nanofiltration process for the nutritional enrichment and refining of rice bran oil. J. Food. Process. Eng. 2011, 102, 16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prudêncio, E.S.; Müller, C.M.; Fritzen-Freire, C.B.; Amboni, R.D.C.; Petrus, J.C.C. Effect of whey nanofiltration process combined with diafiltration on the rheological and physicochemical properties of ricotta cheese. Food Res Int. 2014, 56, 92–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röhricht, M.; Krisam, J.; Weise, U.; Kraus, U.R.; Düring, R.A. Elimination of pharmaceuticals from wastewater by submerged nanofiltration plate modules. Desalination 2010, 250, 1025–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, X.; Zhao, C.; Du, S.; Wang, T.; Luan, Z.; Wang, J.; Hou, D. Fabrication of asymmetric poly(m-phenylene isophthalamide) nanofiltration membrane for chromium (VI) removal. J. Environ. Sci. 2010, 22, 1335–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaviska, F.; Drogui, P.; Grasmick, A.; Azais, A.; Héran, M. Nanofiltration membrane bioreactor for removing pharmaceutical compounds. J. Membrane Sci. 2013, 429, 121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darvishmanesh, S.; Degrève, J.; van der Bruggen, B. Physicochemical characterization of transport in nanosized membrane structures. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2010, 11, 404–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valtcheva, I.B.; Kumbharkar, S.C.; Kim, J.F.; Bhole, Y.; Livingston, A.G. Beyond polyimide: crosslinked polybenzimidazole membranes for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) in harsh environments. J. Membrane Sci. 2014, 457, 62–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micovic, J.; Werth, K.; Lutze, P. Hybrid separations combining distillation and organic solvent nanofiltration for separation of wide boiling mixtures. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2014, 92, 2131–2147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sairam, M.; Loh, X.X.; Bhole, Y.; Sereewatthanawut, I.; Li, K.; Bismarck, A.; Livingston, A.G. Spiral-wound polyaniline membrane modules for organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN). J. Membrane Sci. 2010, 349, 123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, S.; Cavaco, S.A.; Quina, M.J.; Gando-Ferreira, L.M. Nanofiltration process for separating Cr(III) from acid solutions: experimental and modelling analysis. Desalinatio 2010, 254, 80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv, J.; Wang, K.Y.; Chung, T.S. Investigation of amphoteric polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membrane for both cation and anions removal. J. Membrane Sci. 2008, 310, 557–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R.; Chen, G.; Yang, B.; Gao, C. Positively charged composite nanofiltration membrane from quaternized chitosan by toluene diisocyanate cross-linking. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 61, 424–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ba, C.; Ladner, D.A.; Economy, J. Using polyelectrolyte coatings to improve fouling resistance of a positively charged nanofiltration membrane. J. Membrane Sci. 2010, 347, 250–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homayoonfal, M.; Akbari, A.; Mehrnia, M.R. Preparation of polysulfone nanofiltration membranes by UV-assisted grafting polymerization for water softening. Desalination 2010, 263, 217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z.P.; Li, J.; Zhang, D.X.; Chen, C.X. Nanofiltration membrane prepared from polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane by low-temperature plasma: I. Graft of acrylic acid in gas. J. Membrane Sci. 2004, 232, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaep, J.; Vandecasteele, C. Evaluating the charge of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2001, 188, 129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bequet, S.; Abenoza, T.; Aptel, P.; Espenan, J.M.; Remigy, J.C.; Ricard, A. New composite membrane for water softening. Desalination 2000, 131, 299–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan, W.; Bacchin, P.; Aimar, P.; Bruening, M.L.; Tarabara, V.V. Polyelectrolyte multilayer films as backflushable nanofiltration membranes with tunable hydrophilicity and surface charge. J. Membrane Sci. 2010, 349, 268–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béquet, S.; Remigy, J.C.; Rouch, J.C.; Espenan, J.M.; Clifton, M.; Aptel, P. From ultrafiltration to nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes: a continuous UV-photografting process. Desalination 2002, 144, 9–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Y.; Xu, Z.; Gao, C. Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 3693–3700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer, D.R.; Park, S.; Bielawski, C.W.; Ruoff, R.S. The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 228–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, N.Y.; Tiraferri, A.; Phillip, W.A.; Schiffman, J.D.; Hoover, L.A.; Kim, Y.C.; Elimelech, M. Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 4360–4369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, N.Y.; Tiraferri, A.; Phillip, W.A.; Schiffman, J.D.; Elimelech, M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 3812–3818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S.; Zou, L.; Tang, C.Y.; Mulcahy, D. Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J. Membrane Sci. 2012, 396, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, U.; Le-Clech, P.; Stuetz, R.M. Frimmel, F.H.; Chen, V. Characterisation of polymeric fouling in membrane bioreactors and the effect of different filtration modes. J. Membrane Sci. 2007 301, 180–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, S.; Kraume, M. Filterability of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors. Desalination 2002, 146, 373–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, M.A.; Yeon, K.M.; Park, J.S.; Lee, C.H.; Chun, J.; Lim, D.J. Characterization of biofilm structure and its effect on membrane permeability in MBR for dye wastewater treatment. Water. Res. 2006, 40, 45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ognier, S.; Wisniewski, C.; Grasmick, A. Characterisation and modelling of fouling in membrane bioreactors. Desalination 2002, 146, 141–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyko, S.; Al-Halbouni, D.; Wintgens, T.; Janot, A.; Hollender, J.; Dott, W.; Melin, T. Polymeric compounds in activated sludge supernatant—characterisation and retention mechanisms at a full-scale municipal membrane bioreactor. Water. Res. 2007, 41, 3894–3902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Sasson, M.; Zidon, Y.; Calvo, R.; Adin, A. Enhanced removal of natural organic matter by hybrid process of electrocoagulation and dead-end microfiltration. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 232, 338–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, C.; Xue, J.; Ran, F.; Sun, S. Modification of polyethersulfone membranes–A review of methods. Progr. Mater. Sci. 2013, 58, 76–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den, W.; Wang, C.J. Removal of silica from brackish water by electrocoagulation pretreatment to prevent fouling of reverse osmosis membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 59, 318–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scindia, Y.M.; Pandey, A.K.; Reddy, A.V.R. Coupled-diffusion transport of Cr(VI) across anion-exchange membranes prepared by physical and chemical immobilization methods. J. Membrane Sci. 2005, 249, 143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S.U.; Malaisamy, R.; Bruening, M.L. Optimization of flux and selectivity in Cl−/ separations with multilayer polyelectrolyte membranes. J. Membrane Sci. 2006, 283, 366–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priolo, M.A.; Holder, K.M.; Guin, T.; Grunlan, J.C. Recent advances in gas barrier thin films via layer-by-layer assembly of polymers and platelets. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2015, 36, 866–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J.; Sanyal, O.; Izbicki, A.P.; Lee, I. Development of layered multiscale porous thin films by tuning deposition time and molecular weight of polyelectrolytes. Macromol. Rapid. Commun. 2015, 36, 1669–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priolo, M.A.; Holder, K.M.; Greenlee, S.M.; Stevens, B.E.; Grunlan, J.C. Precisely tuning the clay spacing in nanobrick wall gas barrier thin films. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 1649–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodaye, S.; Suresh, G.; Pandey, A.K.; Goswami, A. Studies on diffusional mobility and selectivity of I-ion in plasticized anion-exchange membrane using radiotracer. Radiochim. Acta. 2006, 94, 347–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baburaj, M.S.; Aravindakumar, C.T.; Sreedhanya, S.; Thomas, A.P.; Aravind, U.K. Treatment of model textile effluents with PAA/CHI and PAA/PEI composite membranes. Desalination 2012, 288, 72–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Z.A.; Mahmood, Q.; Raja, I.A.; Malik, A.H.; Khan, M.S.; Wu, D. Chemical oxidation of carwash industry wastewater as an effort to decrease water pollution. Phys. Chem. Earth. A/B/C 2011, 36, 465–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S.U.; Malaisamy, R.; Bruening, M.L. Separation of fluoride from other monovalent anions using multilayer polyelectrolyte nanofiltration membranes. Langmui 2007, 23, 1716–1722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar