Comparisons of Modern U. S. and Canadian Malting Barley Cultivars with Those from Pre-Prohibition: III. Wort Sugar Production during Mashing

Literature cited

• Bamforth, C. W. The Components of Barley and Their Degradation during Malting and Mashing. In Scientific Principles of Malting and Brewing. American Society of Brewing Chemists: St. Paul, MN, 2006; pp 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bamforth, C. W. Current Perspectives on the Role of Enzymes in Brewing. J. Cereal Sci. 2009, 50, 353–357. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. E. The Biochemistry of Malting. In Malts and Malting. Blackie Academic & Professional: London, 1998; pp 133–228.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. E. The Principles of Mashing. In Malts and Malting. Blackie Academic & Professional: London, 1998; pp 229–244.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, D. E.; Hough, J. S.; Stevens, R.; Young, T. W. The Chemistry and Biochemistry of Mashing. In Malting and Brewing Science, Vol. 1 Malt and Sweet Wort. Chapman and Hall: London and New York, 1981; pp 254–303.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, S. H.; Vinje, M. A.; Henson, C.A. Comparisons of Amylolytic Enzyme Activities and β-Amylases with Differing Bmy1; Intron III Alleles to Sugar Production during Congress Mashing with North American Barley Cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2012, 70, 230–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves-Jr., S. L.; Herberts, R. A.; Hollatz, C.; Miletti, L. C.; Stambuk, B. Maltose and Maltotriose Active Transport and Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2007, 65, 99–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A. A Comparison of Barley Malt Quality Measurements and Malt Sugar Concentrations. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2008, 66, 151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A. Tracking the Progress of Sugar Production during Congress Mashing with North American Barley Cultivars and Comparisons to Wort Osmolyte Concentrations and Malt Extract. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2011, 69, 200–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. H.; Vinje, M. A.; Henson, C. A. Tracking Amylolytic Enzyme Activities during Congress Mashing with North American Barley Cultivars: Comparisons of Patterns of Activity and β-Amylases with Differing Bmy1 Intron III Alleles and Correlations of Amylolytic Enzyme Activities. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2012, 70, 10–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, C. A.; Duke, S. H. A Comparison of Standard and Nonstandard Measures of Malt Quality. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2008, 66, 11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z.; Henson, C. A. A Quantitative Assessment of the Importance of Barley Seed α-Amylase, β-Amylase, Debranching Enzyme, and α-Glucosidase in Starch Degradation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1991, 284, 298–305. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90299-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, C. A.; Duke, S. H.; Bockelman, H. E. Comparisons of Modern U.S. and Canadian Malting Barley Cultivars with Those from Pre-Prohibition: II. Amylolytic Enzyme Activities and Thermostabilities. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2018, DOI: 10.1080/03610470.2017.1396843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, A. W. α-Amylase I from Malted Barley—Physical Properties and Action Pattern on Amylose. Cereal Chem. 1978, 55, 754–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, A. W.; Morgan, J. E.; MacGregor, E. A. The Action of Germinated Barley Alpha-amylases on Linear Maltodextrins. Carbohydr. Res. 1992, 227, 301–313. DOI: 10.1016/0008-6215(92)85080-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, E. A.; MacGregor, A. W.; Macri, L. J.; Morgan, J. E. Models for the Action of Alpha-amylase Isozymes on Linear Substrates. Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 257, 249–268. DOI: 10.1016/0008-6215(94)80039-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A.; Bockelman, H. E. Comparisons of Modern U.S. and Canadian Malting Barley Cultivars with Those from Pre-Prohibition: I. Malt Extract and Osmolyte Concentration. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2017, 75, 85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society of Brewing Chemists. Methods of Analysis, 8th ed. Malt-4 Extract; American Society of Brewing Chemists, St. Paul, MN, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Muslin, E. H.; Karpelenia, C. B.; Henson, C. A. The Impact of Thermostable α-Glucosidase on the Production of Fermentable Sugars during Mashing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2003, 61, 142–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. E.; Hayes, P. M.; Henson, C. A. Effects of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the β-Amylase 1 Alleles from Barley on Functional Properties of the Enzymes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2003, 41, 798–804. DOI: 10.1016/S0981-9428(03)00118-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, G. B. Molecular and Cellular Biology Associated with Endosperm Mobilization in Germinating Cereal Grains. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1989, 40, 305–346. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.001513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz, R. J.; Bamforth, C. W. Time Course for the Development of Enzymes in Barley. J. Inst. Brew. 2007, 113, 196–205. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2007.tb00276.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajandouz, E. H.; Abe, J.; Svensson, B.; Marchis-Mouren, G. Barley Malt-α-amylase: Purification, Action Pattern, and Subsite Mapping of Isozyme 1 and Two Members of the Isozyme 2 Subfamily Using p-Nitrophenylated Maltooligosaccharide Substrates. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1992, 1159, 193–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers, E. P.; Duke, S. H. Characterization of α-Amylase from Shoots and Cotyledons of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1990, 92, 1154–1163. DOI: 10.1104/pp.92.4.1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doehlert, D. C.; Duke, S. H.; Anderson, L. Beta-amylases from Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Roots. Plant Physiol. 1982, 69, 1096–1102. DOI: 10.1104/pp.69.5.1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, N.; Stebbins, G. L.; Rodriguez, R. L. Classification and Evolution of α-Amylase Genes in Plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992, 89, 7526–7530. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. T.; Gottschalk, T. E.; Svensson, B. Differences in Conformational Stability of Barley Alpha-amylase Isozymes 1 and 2. Role of Charged Groups and Isozyme 2 Specific Salt Bridges. J. Cereal Sci. 2003, 38, 289–300. DOI: 10.1016/S0733-5210(03)00032-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khursheed, B.; Rogers, J. C. Barley α-Amylase Genes, Quantitative Comparison of Steady-state mRNA Levels from Individual Members of the Two Different Families Expressed in Aleurone Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 18953–18960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, H; Henson, C. A. Characterization of High pI α-Glucosidase from Germinated Barley Seeds: Substrate Specificity, Subsite Affinities and Active-site Residues. Carbohydr. Res. 1995, 277, 145–159. DOI: 10.1016/0008-6215(95)00212-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, J. G.; Dickson, A. D.; Shands, H. L.; Burkhardt, B. A.; Leith, B. D. Second Annual Report on Barley Quality Studies Including the Investigations Conducted 1934–1935 on Barley Grown in 1934. Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station, Madison, and the Division of Cereal Crops and Diseases, Bureau of Plant Industry; United States Department of Agriculture: Madison, WI, 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Doehlert, D. C.; Duke, S. H. Specific Determination of α-Amylase Activity in Crude Plant Extracts Containing β-Amylase. Plant Physiol. 1983, 71, 229–234. DOI: 10.1104/pp.71.2.229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Li, C.; Eglinton, J. K. Improved Prediction of Malt Fermentability by Measurement of the Diastatic Power Enzymes β-Amylase, α-Amylase, and Limit Dextrinase: I. Survey of the Levels of Diastatic Power Enzymes in Commercial Malts. J. Am. Soc. Brew Chem. 2008, 66, 223–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E.; Collins, H.; Eglinton, J.; Wilhelmson, A. Assessing the Impact of the Level of Diastatic Enzymes and Their Thermostability on the Hydrolysis of Starch during Wort Production to Predict Malt Fermentability. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2005, 63, 185–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doehlert, D. C.; Kuo, T. M.; Juvik, J. A.; Beers, E. P.; Duke, S. H. Characteristics of Carbohydrate Metabolism in Sweet Corn (Sugary-1) Endosperms. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1993, 118, 661–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakefuda, G.; Duke, S. H. Electrophoretic Transfer as a Technique for the Detection and Identification of Plant Amylolytic Enzymes in Polyacrylamide Gels. Plant Physiol. 1984, 75, 278–280. DOI: 10.1104/pp.75.1.278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakefuda, G.; Duke, S. H.; Hostak, M. S. Chloroplast and Extrachloroplastic Starch-degrading Enzymes in Pisum sativum L. Planta. 1986, 168, 175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinje, M. A.; Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A. Comparison of Factors Involved in Starch Degradation in Barley Germination under Laboratory and Malting Conditions. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2015, 73, 195–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinje, M. A.; Willis, D. K.; Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A. Differential Expression of Two β-Amylase Genes (Bmy1 and Bmy2) in Developing and Mature Barley Grain. Planta. 2011, 233, 1001–1010. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-011-1348-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlan, H.V.; Martini, M. L.; Pope, M.N. Tests of Barley Varieties in America. U.S. Dept. Agric. Bul. 1925, 1334, 219.
   Google Scholar
• Åberg, E.; Wiebe, G. A. Classification of Barley Varieties Grown in the United States and Canada in 1945. U.S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bul. 907, 1946, 190.
   Google Scholar
• Foote, W. H. Hannchen Barley Production in Oregon…Its Future. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am.. 1965, 2, 230–232.
   Google Scholar
• Sisler, W. W.; Upton, R. L.; Lejeune, A. J. Hannchen and Hanna Malting Barleys for Pacific Northwest. In “Grains of Truth”: About Malting Barley; Malting Barley Improvement Association: Milwaukee, WI, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Lizotte, P. A.; Henson, C. A.; Duke, S. H. Purification and Characterization of Pea Epicotyl β-Amylase. Plant Physiol. 1990, 92, 615–621. DOI: 10.1104/pp.92.3.615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamasaki, Y. β-Amylase in Germinating Millet. Phytochemistry. 2003, 64, 935–939. DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00430-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakefuda, G.; Duke, S. H. Characterization of Pea Chloroplast D-enzyme (4-α-D-glucanotransferase). Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 136–143. DOI: 10.1104/pp.91.1.136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. H.; Henson, C. A. Maltose Effects on Barley Malt Diastatic Power Enzyme Activity and Thermostability at High Isothermal Mashing Temperatures: II. α-Amylase. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2016, 74, 113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, C. A.; Duke, S. H. Maltose Effects on Barley Malt Diastatic Power Enzyme Activity and Thermostability at High Isothermal Mashing Temperatures: I. β-Amylase. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2016, 74, 100–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, H.; Huber, S. C. Regulation of Sucrose Metabolism in Higher Plants: Localization and Regulation of Key Enzymes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2000, 19, 31–67. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-2689(01)80002-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, N. Invertase in Germinated Barley. J. Agr. Food Chem. 1972, 20, 764–768. DOI: 10.1021/jf60182a008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, N. Invertase Activity as a Measure of Malting Quality of Barley. Cereal Chem. 1975, 52, 650–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åman, P.; Hesselman, K.; Tilley, A.-C. The Variation in Chemical Composition of Swedish Barleys. J. Cereal Sci. 1985, 3, 73–77. DOI: 10.1016/S0733-5210(85)80035-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach Knudsen, K. E.; Åman, P.; Eggum, B. O. Nutritive Value of Danish Barley Varieties. I. Carbohydrates and Other Major Constituents. J. Cereal Sci. 1987, 6, 173–186. DOI: 10.1016/S0733-5210(87)80053-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. D.; Harris, G.; MacWilliam, I. C. Carbohydrates in Malting and Brewing. V. Further Studies on the Carbohydrates of Barley, Malt and Wort. J. Inst. Brew. 1956, 62, 232–238. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1956.tb02854.x.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, A. M.; Preece, I. A. Studies on the Free Sugars of Barley Grain V. Comparisons of Sugars and Fructosans with Those of Other Cereals. J. Inst. Brew. 1954, 60, 46–55. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.1954.tb02747.x.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, C. A. Purification and Properties of Barley Stem Fructan Exohydroylase. J. Plant Physiol. 1989, 134, 186–191. DOI: 10.1016/S0176-1617(89)80053-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, C. A.; Livingston, D. P., III. Characterization of a Fructan Exohydrolase Purified from Barley Stems that Hydrolyzes Multiple Fructofuranosidic Linkages. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1998, 36, 715–720. DOI: 10.1016/S0981-9428(98)80021-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar