Multitasking and Aging: Do Older Adults Benefit from Performing a Highly Practiced Task?

REFERENCES

• Allen, P. A. (1990). Influence of processing variability on adult age differences in memory distribution of order information. Cognitive Development, 5, 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Lien, M-C., Murphy, M. D., Sanders, R. E., Judge, K., & McCann, R. (2002). Age differences in overlapping-task performance: Evidence for efficient parallel processing in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 17, 505–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Murphy, M. D., Kaufman, M., Groth, K. E., & Begovic, A. (2004). Age differences in central (semantic) and peripheral processing: The importance of considering both response times and errors. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 59B, P210–P219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Elicker, J. D., & Lien, M.-C. (2009). Multi-session dual-task PRP practice benefits older and younger adults equally. Experimental Aging Research, 35, 369–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P. A., Smith, A. F., Vires-Collins, H., & Sperry, S. (1998). The psychological refractory period: Evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing. Psychology and Aging, 13, 218–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erikson, K., & Becic, E. (2005). Training effects on dual-task performance: Are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control? Psychology and Aging, 20, 695–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bherer, L., Kramer, A. F., Peterson, M. S., Colcombe, S., Erikson, K., & Becic, E. (2006). Testing the limits of cognitive plasticity in older adults: Application to attentional control. Acta Psychologica, 123, 261–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gothe, K., Oberaurer, K., & Kliegl, R. (2007). Age differences in dual-task performance after practice. Psychology and Aging, 22, 596–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, A. A., Maquestiaux, F., & Butts, N. S. (2011). A demonstration of dual-task performance without interference in some older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 181–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., & Strayer, D. L. (1995). Training for attentional control for dual-task settings: A comparison of young and old adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 50–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. F., Larish, J. F., Weber, T. A., & Bardell, L. (1999). Training for executive control. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat ( Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. XVII, pp. 617–652). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lien, M.-C., Allen, P. A., Ruthruff, E., Grabbe, J., McCann, R. S., & Remington, R. W. (2006). Visual word recognition without central attention: Evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age. Psychology and Aging, 21, 431–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maquestiaux, F., Lagué-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., & Bherer, L. (2008). Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1262–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A., & Bertsch, J. (2004). Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychology and Aging, 19, 649–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maquestiaux, F., Lague-Beauvais, M., Ruthruff, E., Hartley, A. A., & Bherer, L. (2010). Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: Declining automaticity with advancing age. Psychology and Aging, 25, 177–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neider, M. B., Gaspar, J. G., McCarley, J. S., Crowell, J. A., Kaczmarski, H., & Kramer, A. F. (2011). Walking and talking: Dual-task effects on street crossing behavior in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26, 260–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 278–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 408–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 438–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthruff, E., Allen, P. A., Lien, M.-C., & Grabbe, J. (2008). Visual word recognition without central attention: Evidence for greater automaticity for greater reading ability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 337–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. W. (2009). How strategic is the central bottleneck: Can it be overcome by trying harder? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1368–1384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., & Van Selst, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthruff, E., Pashler, H., & Klaassen, A. (2001). Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: Structural limitation or voluntary postponement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthruff, E., Van Selst, M., Johnston, J. C., & Remington, R. W. (2006). How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or simply stage-shortening? Psychological Research, 70, 125–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedek, F., Lovden, M., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). On the relation of mean reaction time and intraindividual reaction time variability. Psychology and Aging, 24, 841–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime users guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Spaniol, J., Madden, D. J., & Voss, A. (2008). A diffusion model analysis of age differences in episodic and semantic long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 101–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobach, T., Liepelt, R., Pashler, H., Frensch, P. A., & Schubert, T. (in press). Effects of extensive dual-task practice on processing stages in simultaneous choice tasks. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75, 900–920.
   Google Scholar
• Telford, C. W. (1931). Refractory phase of voluntary and associative response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Thapar, A., Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on letter discrimination. Psychology and Aging, 18, 415–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2000, November). Is the PRP effect due to a strategic or structural bottleneck? Paper presented at the 41st annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, A., Rothermund, K., & Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1206–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, A., & Voss, J. (2007). Fast-dm: A free program for efficient diffusion model analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 767–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welford, A. T. (1952). The ‘‘psychological refractory period’’ and the timing of high-speed performance—A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar