Publication Cover
Experimental Aging Research
An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process
Volume 40, 2014 - Issue 3
208
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Towards an Aging-Specific Cognitive Phenotype: The Freedom House Study

, , &
Pages 245-265 | Received 21 Dec 2012, Accepted 07 Apr 2013, Published online: 30 Apr 2014

REFERENCES

  • Bauer, D., & Curran, P. (2003a). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338–363.
  • Bauer, D., & Curran, P. (2003b). Overextraction of latent trajectory classes: Much ado about nothing? Reply to Rindskopf, Muthén, and Cudeck and Henly. Psychological Methods, 8, 384–393.
  • Benton, A., & Hamsher, K. (1989). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, IA: AJA Associates.
  • Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212.
  • Elias, J. W. Comp: (1979). Lifespan perspective on cerebral asymmetry and information processing with an emphasis on the aging adult. Century Systems and Communication in the Elderly, 18, 187–201.
  • Farias, S. T., Mungas, D., Hinton, L., & Haan, M. (2011). Demographic, neuropsychological, and functional predictors of rate of longitudinal cognitive decline in Hispanic older adults. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 440–450.
  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). ‘Mini-Mental State’: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
  • Ghisletta, P., & Lindenberger, U. (2004). Static and dynamic longitudinal structural analyses of cognitive changes in old age. Gerontology, 50, 12–16.
  • Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 6, 549–576.
  • Hayden, K. M., Reed, B. R., Manly, J. J., Tommet, D., Pietrzak, R. H., Chelune, G. J., Yang, F. M., Revell, A. J., Bennett, D. A., & Jones, R. N. (2011). Cognitive decline in the elderly: An analysis of population heterogeneity. Age and Ageing, 40, 684–689.
  • Hofer, S. M., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2001). Understanding Ageing. An evaluation of research designs for assessing the interdependence of ageing-related changes. Gerontology, 47, 341–352.
  • Ino, T., Asada, T., Ito, J., Kimura, T., & Fukuyama, H. (2003). Parieto-frontal networks for clock drawing revealed with fMRI. Neuroscience Research, 45, 71–77.
  • Jensen, A. R. (1993). Spearman’s g: Links between psychometrics and biology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 702, 103–129.
  • Kraemer, H. C., Yesavage, J. A., Taylor, J. L., & Kupfer, D. (2000). How can we learn about developmental processes from cross-sectional studies, or can we? American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 163–171.
  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778.
  • Madden, D. J., Bennett, I. J., & Song, A. W. (2009). Cerebral white matter integrity and cognitive aging: Contributions from diffusion tensor imaging. Neuropsychological Reviews, 19, 415–435.
  • Matsuoka, T., Narumoto, J., Shibata, K., Okamura, A., Nakamura, K., Nakamae, T., Yamada, K., Nishimura, T., & Fukui, K. (2011). Neural correlates of performance on the different scoring systems of the clock drawing test. Neuroscience Letters, 487, 421–425.
  • Mattis, S (1988). Dementia Rating Scale: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • McArdle, J., & Bell, R. (2000). An introduction to latent growth models for developmental data. In T. Little, K. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples ( pp. 9–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • McArdle, J. J., Fisher, G. G., & Kadlec, K. M. (2007). Latent variable analyses of age trends of cognition in the Health and Retirement Study, 1992–2004. Psychological Aging, 22, 525–545.
  • McArdle, J. J., Grimm, K. J., Hamagami, F., Bowles, R. P., & Meredith, W. (2009). Modeling life-span growth curves of cognition using longitudinal data with multiple samples and changing scales of measurement. Psychological Methods, 14, 126–149.
  • McArdle, J., & Hamagami, F. (1992). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross sectional data using latent growth structural models. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 145–166.
  • McDowd, J. M., & Birren, J. E. (1990). In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging ( pp. 222–234). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • McGue, M., & Christensen, K. (2002). Heritability of level of and rate of change in cognitive functioning in Danish twins aged 70 years and older. Experimental Aging Research, 28, 435–451.
  • MacDonald, S. W., DeCarlo, C. A., & Dixon, R. A. (2011). Linking biological and cognitive aging: Toward improving characterizations of developmental time. Journals of Gerontology B Psychological Sciences, Social Sciences, 66 (Suppl. 1), i59–i70.
  • MacDonald, S. W., Dixon, R. A., Cohen, A. L., & Hazlitt, J. E. (2004). Biological age and 12-year cognitive change in older adults: Findings from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Gerontology, 50, 64–81.
  • Muthén B. (2003). Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: Comment on Bauer and Curran. Psychological Methods, 8, 369–377.
  • Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2004). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers—Users guide. Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
  • Muthén, B., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463–469.
  • Piccinin, A. M., Muniz, G., Sparks, C., & Bontempo, D. E. (2011). An evaluation of analytical approaches for understanding change in cognition in the context of aging and health. Journals of Gerontology B Psychological Sciences, Social Sciences, 66 (Suppl. 1), i36–i49.
  • Proust, C., & Jacqmin-Gadda, H. (2005). Estimation of linear mixed models with a mixture of distribution for the random effects. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 78, 165–173.
  • Reynolds, C. A., Finkle, D., Gatz, M., & Pedersen, N. L. (2002). Sources of influence on rate of cognitive change over time in Swedish twins: An application of latent growth models. Experimental Aging Research, 28, 407–433.
  • Rourke, B. P. (1995). Introduction: The NVLD syndrome and the white matter model. In B. P. Rourke (Ed.), Syndrome of nonverbal learning disabilities: Neurodevelopmental manifestations. New York: Guilford.
  • Royall, D. R., Chiodo, L. K., & Polk, M. (2003). Executive dyscontrol in normal aging: Normative data, factor structure and clinical correlates. Currents in Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 3, 487–493.
  • Royall, D. R., Cordes, J. A., & Polk, M. (1998). An executive clock drawing task. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurery and Psychiatry, 64, 588–594.
  • Royall, D. R., Mahurin, R. K., & Gray, K.F. (1992). Bedside assessment of executive cognitive impairment: The Executive Interview (EXIT). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 1221–1226.
  • Royall, D. R., Palmer, R., Chiodo, L. K., & Polk, M. J. (2004). Declining executive control in normal aging predicts change in functional status: The Freedom House Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 346–352.
  • Royall, D. R., Palmer, R., Chiodo, L. K., & Polk, M. J. (2005a). Executive control mediates memory’s association with change in functional status: The Freedom House Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53,, 11–17.
  • Royall, D. R., Palmer, R., Chiodo, L. K., & Polk, M. J. (2005b). Normal rates of cognitive change in successful aging: The Freedom House Study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 899–909.
  • Salthouse, T. A. (1985). A theory of cognitive aging. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.
  • Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Reviews, 103, 403–428.
  • Schafer, J. (1987). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman & Hall.
  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, JW. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.
  • Schwartz, G. (1987). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
  • Small, B. J., & Bäckman, L. (2007). Longitudinal trajectories of cognitive change in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: A growth mixture modeling analysis. Cortex, 43, 826–834.
  • Terrera, G. M., Brayne, C., & Matthews, F. (2010). One size fits all? Why we need more sophisticated analytical methods in the explanation of trajectories of cognition in older age and their potential risk factors. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 291–299.
  • Terrera, G. M., Matthews, F., & Brayne, C. (2008). A comparison of parametric models for the investigation of the shape of cognitive change in the older population. BioMedCentral Neurology, 8, 16.
  • Willet, J., & Sayer, A. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363–381.
  • Xie, H., Mayo, N., & Koski, L. (2011). Identifying and characterizing trajectories of cognitive change in older persons with mild cognitive impairment. Dementia and Geriatric Cogitive Disorders, 31, 165–172.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.