Publication Cover
Experimental Aging Research
An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process
Volume 40, 2014 - Issue 5
128
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Retrieval Context of Intervening Tasks Influences Subsequent Memory in Younger and Older Adults

Pages 555-577 | Received 21 May 2013, Accepted 13 Aug 2013, Published online: 16 Oct 2014

REFERENCES

  • Aizpurua, A., & Koutstaal, W. (2010). Aging and flexible remembering: Contributions of conceptual span, fluid intelligence, and frontal functioning. Psychology and Aging, 25, 193–207.
  • Ball, H. B., Marsh, R. L., Meeks, T., & Hicks, J. L. (2011). The reactivation of associated information affects source monitoring. Memory & Cognition, 39, 818–826.
  • Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson–Denny reading test: Manual for scoring and interpretation. Chicago: Riverside.
  • Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1547–1552.
  • Chalfonte, B. L., & Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 24, 403–416.
  • Chan, J. K., & Langley, M. M. (2011). Paradoxical effects of testing: Retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 248–255.
  • Davis, D., & Loftus, E. F. (2007). Internal and external sources of misinformation in adult witness memory. In M. P. Toglia, J. Read, D. F. Ross, R. L. Lindsay ( Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Volume I: Memory for events ( pp. 195–237). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dodson, C. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1993). Rate of false source attributions depends on how questions are asked. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 541–557.
  • Foley, M. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: A developmental comparison. Child Development, 56, 1145–1155.
  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
  • Garry, M., Manning, C. G., Loftus, E. F., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 208–214.
  • Girden, E. (1992). ANOVA: Repeated measures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Goff, L. M., & Roediger, H. (1998). Imagination inflation for action events: Repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections. Memory & Cognition, 26, 20–33.
  • Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., Vnek, N., & Ferguson, S. A. (1994). Aging and the effects of affective and factual focus on source monitoring and recall. Psychology and Aging, 9, 160–170.
  • Hekkanen, S. T., & McEvoy, C. (2002). False memories and source-monitoring problems: Criterion differences. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 73–85.
  • Henkel, L. A. (2004). Erroneous memories arising from repeated attempts to remember. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 26–46.
  • Henkel, L. A. (2007). The benefits and costs of repeated memory tests for young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 22, 580–595.
  • Henkel, L. A. (2008). Maximizing the benefits and minimizing the costs of repeated memory tests for young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 23, 250–262.
  • Henkel, L. A. (2011). Photograph-induced memory errors: When photos make people claim they’ve done things they haven’t. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 78–86.
  • Henkel, L. A., & Franklin, N. (1998). Reality monitoring of physically similar and conceptually related objects. Memory and Cognition, 26, 659–673.
  • Henkel, L. A., Franklin, N., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Cross-modal confusions between perceived and imagined events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 321–335.
  • Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1998). Aging and source monitoring: Cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 251–268.
  • Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (1999). Attempts to reduce the incidence of false recall with source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1195–1209.
  • Huff, M. J., Coane, J. H., Hutchison, K. A., Grasser, E. B., & Blais, J. E. (2012). Interpolated task effects on direct and mediated false recognition: Effects of initial recall, recognition, and the ironic effect of guessing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1720–1730.
  • Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126–135.
  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
  • Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1996). Emotional focus and source monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 135–156.
  • Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67–85.
  • Kang, S. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 528–558.
  • Karpicke, J. D., & Zaromb, F. M. (2010). Retrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 227–239.
  • Koutstaal, W. (2006). Flexible remembering. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 84–91.
  • Koutstaal, W., & Cavendish, M. (2006). Using what we know: Consequences of intentionally retrieving gist versus item-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 778–791.
  • Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Johnson, M. K., & Galluccio, L. (1999). Facilitation and impairment of event memory produced by photograph review. Memory & Cognition, 27, 478–493.
  • Lampinen, J., Meier, C. R., Arnal, J. D., & Leding, J. K. (2005). Compelling untruths: Content borrowing and vivid false memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 954–963.
  • Lyle, K. B., Bloise, S. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2006). Age-related binding deficits and the content of false memories. Psychology and Aging, 21, 86–95.
  • Lyle, K. B., & Johnson, M. K. (2006). Importing perceived features into false memories. Memory, 14, 197–213.
  • Marsh, E. J. (2007). Retelling is not the same as recalling: Implications for memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 16–20.
  • Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1137–1151.
  • McDermott, K. B. (2006). Paradoxical effects of testing: Repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall. Memory & Cognition, 34, 261–267.
  • Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. (2006). The effect of forced recall on illusory recollection in younger and older adults. American Journal of Psychology, 119, 433–462.
  • Meyer, A. N. D., & Logan, J. M. (2013). Taking the testing effect beyond the college freshman: Benefits for lifelong learning. Psychology and Aging, 28, 142–147.
  • Mitchell, K., and Johnson, M. K. (2000). Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences. In E. Tulving and F.I.M. Craik ( Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory ( pp. 179–195). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., & D’Esposito, M. (2000). fMRI evidence of age-related hippocampal dysfunction in feature binding in working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 197–206.
  • Ozubko, J. D., & Fugelsang, J. (2011). Remembering makes evidence compelling: Retrieval from memory can give rise to the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 270–276.
  • Payne, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 5–27.
  • Psychological Software Tools. (2002). E-Prime (Version 1.1). [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
  • Roediger, H., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181–210.
  • Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.
  • Roediger, H., McDermott, K. B., & Goff, L. M. (1997). Recovery of true and false memories: Paradoxical effects of repeated testing. In M. A. Conway ( Ed.), Recovered memories and false memories ( pp. 118–149). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Suengas, A. G., & Johnson, M. K. (1988). Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 377–389.
  • Tse, C., Balota, D., & Roediger, H. L. (2010). The benefits and costs of repeated testing on the learning of face-name pairs in healthy older adults. Psychology and Aging, 25, 833–845.
  • Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Weinstein, Y., & Nash, R. A. (2013). False recognition of objects in visual scenes: Findings from a combined direct and indirect memory test. Memory & Cognition, 41, 60–68.
  • Weinstein, Y., & Shanks, D. R. (2008). Perceptual representations in false recognition and priming of pictures. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1415–1428.
  • Whittlesea, B. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235–1253.
  • Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Li, K. H. (2000). Human memory. In F. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse ( Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 293–357). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Zaragoza, M., Belli, R., & Payment, K. (2007). Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. In M. Garry & H. Hayne ( Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom ( pp. 35–63). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.