Aging Strikes the Self-Face Advantage in Featural Processing

References

• Boutet, I., & Faubert, J. (2006). Recognition of faces and complex objects in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 34, 854–864. doi: 10.3758/BF03193432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredart, S. (2003). Recognising the usual orientation of one’s own face: The role of asymmetrically located details. Perception, 32, 805–811. doi: 10.1068/p3354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, M. G., Avero, P., & Lundqvist, D. (2006). Facilitated detection of angry faces: Initial orienting and processing efficiency. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 785–811. doi: 10.1080/02699930500465224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30, 39–78. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, S., & Bentin, S. (2012). Age-related changes in processing faces from detection to identification: ERP evidence. Neurobiology of Aging, 33, 206.e1–206.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devue, C., & Bredart, S. (2011). The neural correlates of visual self-recognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devue, C., Van Der Stigchel, S., Bredart, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2009). You do not find your own face faster; you just look at it longer. Cognition, 111, 114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favelle, S. K., & Palmisano, S. (2012). The face inversion effect following pitch and yaw rotations: Investigating the boundaries of holistic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 563. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, H., Zhang, S., Li, Q., Tao, R., & Xu, S. (2012). Dissociations of subliminal and supraliminal self-face from other-face processing: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2933–2942. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillihan, S. J., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Is self special? A critical review of evidence from experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 76–97. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. N., & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. (2009). Not all Faces are processed equally: Evidence for featural rather than holistic processing of one’s own face in a face-imaging task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 35, 499–508. doi: 10.1037/a0014640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutchess, A. H., Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Aging, self-referencing, and medial prefrontal cortex. Social Neuroscience, 2, 117–133. doi: 10.1080/17470910701399029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H., & Bruce, V. (1996). Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 986–1004. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. P., McCutcheon, B., Freund, S., Gallup, G. G. J., Sanders, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (1999). Left hand advantage in a self-face recognition task. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1421–1425. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00025-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, H. (2012). Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: The role of configural and featural information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 760–772. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.636822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, H., & Brady, N. (2010). Self-face recognition is characterized by “bilateral gain” and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 840–847. doi: 10.1080/17470211003611264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, H., Brady, N., Reilly, R. B., & Foxe, J. J. (2010). My face or yours? Event-related potential correlates of self-face processing. Brain and Cognition, 72, 244–254. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konar, Y., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2013). Effects of aging on face dentification and holistic face processing. Vision Research, 88, 38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., He, X., Rotsthein, P., & Sui, J. (2016). Dynamically orienting your own face facilitates the automatic attraction of attention. Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 37–44. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1044428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., & Han, S. (2012). Functional dissociation of the left and right fusiform gyrus in self-face recognition. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2255–2267. doi: 10.1002/hbm.v33.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone, E. (2008). Configural processing and face viewpoint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 310–327. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinhardt-Injac, B., Persike, M., & Meinhardt, G. (2014). Holistic processing and reliance on global viewing strategies in older adults’ face perception. Acta Psychologica, 151, 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2012). The Own-Age bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 146–174. doi: 10.1037/a0025750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128, 274–289. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Dricot, L., Devolder, A., Bodart, J. M., Crommelinck, M., De Gelder, B., & Zoontjes, R. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 793–802. doi: 10.1162/089892900562606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezgin, B., Findikcioglu, K., Kaya, B., Sibar, S., & Yavuzer, R. (2012). Mirror on the wall: A study of women’s perception of facial features as they age. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 32, 421–425. doi: 10.1177/1090820X12442083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiura, M., Sassa, Y., Jeong, H. J., Miura, N., Akitsuki, Y., Horie, K., … Kawashima, R. (2006). Multiple brain networks for visual self-recognition with different sensitivity for motion and body part. Neuroimage, 32, 1905–1917. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1016–1035. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troje, N. F., & Kersten, D. (1999). Viewpoint-dependent recognition of familiar faces. Perception, 28, 483–487. doi: 10.1068/p2901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakiris, M. (2008). Looking for myself: Current multisensory input alters self-face Recognition. PLoS ONE, 3, e4040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli. Vision Research, 34, 1187–1195. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90300-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145. doi: 10.1037/h0027474
   Google Scholar