Publication Cover
Experimental Aging Research
An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process
Latest Articles
964
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Age-Related Differences in Decision-Making: Evidence Accumulation is More Gradual in Older Age

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 23 Aug 2022, Accepted 24 Jul 2023, Published online: 29 Jul 2023

References

  • Allemand, M., Zimprich, D., & Hendriks, A. (2008). Age differences in five personality domains across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 758–770. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.758
  • Boehm, U., Annis, J., Frank, M. J., Hawkins, G. E., Heathcote, A. … Palmeri, T. J. (2018). Estimating across-trial variability parameters of the diffusion decision model: Expert advice and recommendations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 87, 46–75. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2018.09.004
  • Chin, J., Anderson, E., Chin, C.-L., & Fu, W.-T. (2015). Age differences in information search: An exploration-exploitation tradeoff model. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 59(1), 85–89. doi:10.1177/1541931215591018
  • Chin, J., Payne, B. R., Fu, W. T., Morrow, D. G., & Stine‐Morrow, E. A. (2015). Information foraging across the life span: Search and switch in unknown patches. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(3), 428–450. doi:10.1111/tops.12147
  • Dully, J., McGovern, D. P., & O’Connell, R. G. (2018). The impact of natural aging on computational and neural indices of perceptual decision making: A review. Behavioural Brain Research, 355, 48–55. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2018.02.001
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
  • Hartshorne, J. K., & Germine, L. T. (2015). When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span. Psychological Science, 26(4), 433–443. doi:10.1177/0956797614567339
  • Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Lerche, V., von Krause, M., Voss, A., Frischkorn, G. T., Schubert, A.-L., & Hagemann, D. (2020). Diffusion modeling and intelligence: Drift rates show both domain-general and domain-specific relations with intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(12), 2207–2249. doi:10.1037/xge0000774
  • Lerche, V., & Voss, A. (2016). Model complexity in diffusion modeling: Benefits of making the model more parsimonious. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1324. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01324
  • Lerche, V., Voss, A., & Nagler, M. (2017). How many trials are required for parameter estimation in diffusion modeling? A comparison of different optimization criteria. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 513–537. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0740-2
  • Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
  • Mata, R., Wilke, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2009). Cognitive aging and adaptive foraging behavior. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64(4), 474–481. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbp035
  • Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V. … Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
  • Patten, K. J., Greer, K., Likens, A. D., Amazeen, E. L., & Amazeen, P. G. (2020). The trajectory of thought: Heavy-tailed distributions in memory foraging promote efficiency. Memory & Cognition, 48(5), 772–787. doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01015-7
  • Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643–675. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643
  • Radev, S. T., D’Alessandro, M., Mertens, U. K., Voss, A., Köthe, U., & Bürkner, P.-C. (2021). Amortized bayesian model comparison with evidential deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 1–15. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3124052
  • Radev, S. T., Mertens, U. K., Voss, A., Ardizzone, L., & Köthe, U. (2020). BayesFlow: Learning complex stochastic models with invertible neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(4), 1452–1466. doi:10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3042395
  • Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
  • Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922. doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
  • Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9(5), 347–356. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067
  • Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 408–424. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.11.002
  • Raven, J. C. (1982). Revised manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scale. Windsor, UK: NFER Nelson.
  • Rhodes, T., & Turvey, M. T. (2007). Human memory retrieval as Lévy foraging. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 385(1), 255–260. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.001
  • Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
  • Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Selective review of cognitive aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(5), 754–760. doi:10.1017/S1355617710000706
  • Schaie, K. W. (2005). What can we learn from longitudinal studies of adult development? Research in Human Development, 2(3), 133–158. doi:10.1207/s15427617rhd0203_4
  • Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H.-M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(3), 414–429. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414
  • Smith, P. L., Ratcliff, R., & Sewell, D. K. (2014). Modeling perceptual discrimination in dynamic noise: Time-changed diffusion and release from inhibition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 59, 95–113. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2013.05.007
  • Spaniol, J., Madden, D. J., & Voss, A. (2006). A diffusion model analysis of adult age differences in episodic and semantic long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 101–117. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.101
  • Starns, J. J., & Ratcliff, R. (2010). The effects of aging on the speed–accuracy compromise: Boundary optimality in the diffusion model. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 377–390. doi:10.1037/a0018022
  • Stephen, D. G., Mirman, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Dixon, J. A. (2009). Lévy-like diffusion in eye movements during spoken-language comprehension. Physical Review E, 79(5), 056114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.79.056114
  • Theisen, M., Lerche, V., von Krause, M., & Voss, A. (2020). Age differences in diffusion model parameters: A meta-analysis. Psychological Research, 85(5), 2012–2021. doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01371-8
  • Underwood, B. J. (1975). Individual differences as a crucible in theory construction. American Psychologist, 30(2), 128–134. doi:10.1037/h0076759
  • Viswanathan, G., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Da Luz, M., Raposo, E., & Stanley, H. E. (1999). Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature, 401(6756), 911–914. doi:10.1038/44831
  • Viswanathan, G., Raposo, E., & Da Luz, M. (2008). Lévy flights and superdiffusion in the context of biological encounters and random searches. Physics of Life Reviews, 5(3), 133–150. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2008.03.002
  • von Krause, M., Radev, S., & Voss, A. (2022). Mental speed is high until age 60 as revealed by analysis of over a million participants. Nature Human Behavior, 6(5), 700–708. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01282-7
  • Voss, A., Lerche, V., Mertens, U., & Voss, J. (2019). Sequential sampling models with variable boundaries and non-normal noise: A comparison of six models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 813–832. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1560-4
  • Voss, A., Nagler, M., & Lerche, V. (2013). Diffusion models in experimental psychology: A practical introduction. Experimental Psychology, 60(6), 385–402. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000218
  • Voss, A., Rothermund, K., & Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: An empirical validation. Memory & Cognition, 32(7), 1206–1220. doi:10.3758/BF03196893
  • Watson, D. (1988). The vicissitudes of mood measurement: Effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 128–141. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.128
  • Wechsler, D. (1997). Administration and scoring manual for the WAIS–III. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  • Wieschen, E. M., Voss, A., & Radev, S. T. (2020). Jumping to conclusion? A Lévy flight model of decision making. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16(2), 120–132. doi:10.20982/tqmp.16.2.p120
  • Wieschen, E. M., Voss, A., von Krause, M., Vollmoeller, C., & Lerche, V. (2022). Is “jumpiness” in evidence accumulation a personality trait? Cross-task correlations and retest reliability of the parameters of the Lévy flight model [ Manuscript submitted for publication].