Attribute-variable Inspection Policy for Lots Using Resampling Based on EWMA

References

• Aslam, M., Azam, M., Jun, C.-H. (2013). A mixed repetitive sampling plan based on process capability index. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 37(24):10027–10035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Azam, M., Jun, C.-H. (2015). A new lot inspection procedure based on exponentially weighted moving average. International Journal of Systems Science, 46(8):1392–1400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Azam, M., Balamurali, S., Jun, C.-H. (2012). A new mixed acceptance sampling plan based on sudden death testing under the Weibull distribution. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers 29(6):427–433.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Huang, S.-R., Jun, C.-H., Ahmad, M., Rasool, M. (2011). A reliability sampling plan based on progressive interval censoring under pareto distribution of second kind. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems 10(2):154–160.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Jun, C.-H., Lio, Y.L., Ahmad, M., Rasool, M. (2011). Group acceptance sampling plans for resubmitted lots under Burr-Type XII distributions. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers 28(8):606–615.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Wu, C.W., Azam, M., Jun, C.-H. (2013). Variable sampling inspection for resubmitted lots based on process capability index Cpk for normally distributed items. Applied Mathematical Modeling 37:667–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Yen, C.-H, Chang, C.-H., Jun, C.-H, Ahmad, M., Rasool, M. (2012). Two-stage variables acceptance sampling plans using process loss functions. Communication in Statistics: Theory and Method 41(20):3633–3647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Jun, C.-H. (2006). Repetitive group sampling procedure for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics, 33(3):327–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., Jun, C.-H. (2007). Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data. European Journal of Operational Research 180:1221–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruhn-Suhr, M., Krumbholz, W. (1990). A new variable sampling plan for normally distributed lots with unknown standard deviation and double specification limits. Statistical Papers 31:195–207.
   Google Scholar
• Calvin, T.W. (1990): How and When to Perform Bayesian Acceptance Sampling. Vol. 45, Wisconsin: American Society for Quality Control.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, J.M. (1952). Tables for constructing and for computing the operating characteristics of single sampling plans. Industrial Quality Control 9:37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J-W., Li, K-H., Lam, Y. (2007). Bayesian single and double variable sampling plans for the Weibull distribution with censoring. European Journal of Operations Research 177:1062–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, N.K. (1974): A new prior distribution for attributes sampling. Technometrics 16:93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, H.Y., Rinks, B.D. (1998). Three types of producer's and consumer's risks in single sampling plan. Journal of Quality Technology 30:254–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čisar, P. (2011). Optimization methods of EWMA statistics. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 8(5):73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collani, E.V. (1990). A note on acceptance sampling for variables. Metrika 38:19–36
   Google Scholar
• Damija, O.P., Hammer, W.C. K. (1990). Manual of Food Quality Control. Vol. 6. Food for Export, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 14/6. Rev. 1, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Deva Arul, S., Jemmy Joyce, V. (2010). Selection of mixed sampling plans for second quality lots. Economic Quality Control 25:31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A.J. (1986). Quality Control and Industrial Statistics. ( 5th ed.). Homewood, Illinois: Richard D, Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, D., Pierce, R.L. (1993). On the choice of the prior distribution in hypergeometric sampling. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 22:2125–2146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., Balamurali, S. (1998). Chain sampling plan for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics 25:103–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., Kuralmani, V. (1992) A note on the operating characteristic curve of the known sigma single sampling variables plan. Communications in Statistics – Theory Methods 21:2339–2347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., S. Ganesalingam, (1997). Sampling inspection for resubmitted lots. Communication in Statistics- Simulation and Computation 26(3):1163–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamkhaneh, E.B., Gildeh, B.S., Yari, G. (2011). Inspection error and its effect on single sampling plans with fuzzy parameters. Structural and multidisciplinary Optimization 43(4):555–560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, F.E. (1949). On designing single sampling inspection plans. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20:242–256.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, W.C. (1969). Use of the binomial, hypergeometric and poisson tables to obtain sampling plans. Journal of Quality Technology 1:105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Hald, A. (1981): Statistical Theory of Sampling Inspection by Attributes. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J.E. (1979). Minimum variance and VOQL sampling plans. Technometrics 21:555–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, H.C. (1979). Acceptance sampling for percent defective by variables and by attributes. Journal of Quality Technology 11:139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalgonda A.A., Koshti V.V., Ashokan, K.V. (2011). Exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Asian Journal of Management Research 2(1):253–263.
   Google Scholar
• Klufa, J. (2010). Exact calculation of Dodge-Romig LTPD single sampling plans for inspection by variables. Statistical Papers 51(2):297–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauer, G.N. (1978). Acceptance probabilities for sampling plans where the proportion defective has a beta distribution. Journal of Quality Technology 10:52–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, G.J., Resnikoff, G.J. (1955). Sampling plans for inspection by variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 50:72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loganathan, A., Rajagoapal, K., Vijayaraghavan, R. (2007). A Study on the Behavior of Operating Characteristic Curves of Sampling Plans Based on Polya Distribution. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Science 27:111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, J.M., Saccucci, M.S. (1990). Exponentially weighted moving average control charts: properties and enhancements (with discussion). Technometrics 32:1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C. (2005). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Negrin, I., Parmet, Y., Schechtman, E. (2009). Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk. Quality Engineering 21:306–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrin, I., Parmet, Y., Schechtman, E. (2011). Developing a sampling plan based on Cpk – Unknown Variance. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 27:3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, D.B. (1967). Variables sampling plans based on the normal distribution. Technometrics 9:417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, E. (1954). Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41:100–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., Jun, C.-H. (2012). Multivariate process control chart for controlling the false discovery rate. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems, 11(4):385–389.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagoapal, K., Loganathan, A., Vijayaraghavan, R. (2009). Selection of bayesian single sampling attributes plans based on polya distribution. Economic Quality Control 24(2):179–193.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, E.G. (1982): Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, W. (1997). Is sampling by variables worse than sampling by attributes? A decision theoretic analysis and a new mixed strategy for inspecting individual lots. Sankhya B 59:96–107.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V.P., Palanki, H.R. (1976). Quality levels in acceptance sampling. Journal of Quality Technology 8:37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, D.J. (1981). Two-point double variables sampling plans. Journal of Quality Technology 13:25–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soundararajan, V. (1975): Maximum Allowable Percent Defective (MAPD). Single sampling inspection by attributes. Journal of Quality Technology 7:173–177.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, L.J. (1978). A closed form solution for single sample acceptance sampling plans. Journal of Quality Technology 10:159–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, T.-R., Lin, C.-W. (2010). Acceptance sampling plans under progressive interval censoring with likelihood ratio. Statistical Papers 51(2):259–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangjeli, E. (2012). ASN-minimax double sampling plans by variables for two sided limits when the standard deviation is known. Statistical Papers 53(1):229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan, R., Rajagoapal, K., Loganathan, A. (2008). A procedure for selection of a Gamma-Poisson single sampling plan by attributes. Journal of Applied Statistics 35(2):149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C-.H., Tsai, W.C. (2012). Determining the production lot size with a heuristic inspection policy for controlling the quality of input materials and products. International Journal of System Science 43(11):2030–2039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, H. (1965). The use of incomplete beta functions for prior distributions in binomial sampling. Technometrics 7:335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.W., Aslam, M., Jun, C.-H. (2012). Variable sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on process performance index. European Journal of Operational Research 217:560–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.W., Pearn, W.L.(2008). A variables sampling plan based on Cpmk for product acceptance determination. European Journal of Operational Research 184:549–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, M.-J., Chen, S.-C. (2012). A common cycle approach for solving the economics lot and inspection scheduling problem. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization 8(1):141–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar