Adaptive procedure for generalized familywise error rate control

References

• Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 57:289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y. (2000). On adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 25:60–83.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A., Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika 93:491–507.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, G., Roquain, E. (2009). Adaptive FDR control under independence and dependence. Journal of Machine Learning Research 10:2837–2871.
   Google Scholar
• Finner, H., Gontscharuk, V. (2009). Controlling the familywise error rate with plug-in estimator for the proportion of true null hypotheses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 71:1031–1048.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, W. (2009). A note on adaptive Bonferroni and Holm procedures under dependence. Biometrika 96:1012–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, W., Romano, J. P. (2007). A generalized Šidàk–Holm procedure and control of generalized error rates under independence. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 6(1): Article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, W., Sarkar, S. K. (2012). Adaptive controls of FWER and FDR under block dependence. Working paper. Available at https://web.njit.edu/ wguo/Guo%20&%20Sarkar% 202012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gontscharuk, V. (2010). Asymptotic and Exact Results on FWER and FDR in Multiple Hypotheses Testing. PhD thesis, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
   Google Scholar
• Heesen, P., Janssen, A. (2016). Dynamic adaptive multiple tests with finite sample FDR control. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 168:38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E. L., Romano, J. P. (2005). Generalizations of the familywise error rate. Annals of Statistics 33:1138–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, K., Nettleton, D. (2012). Adaptive and dynamic adaptive procedures for false discovery rate control and estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 74:163–182.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, J. P., Shaikh, A. M. (2006). Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate. Annals of Statistics 34:1850–1873.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. K. (2007). Stepup procedures controlling generalized FWER and generalized FDR. Annals of Statistics 35:2405–2420.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. K. (2008a). Generalizing Simes’ test and Hochberg’s stepup procedure. Annals of Statistics 36:337–363.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. K. (2008b). On methods controlling the false discovery rate. Sankhya 70:135–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. K., Guo, W., Finner, H. (2012). On adaptive procedures controlling the familywise error rate. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142:65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Schweder, T., Spjøtvoll, E. (1982). Plots of p-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously. Biometrika 69:493–502.
   Google Scholar
• Storey, J. D., Taylor, J. E., Siegmund, D. (2004). Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 66:187–205.
   Google Scholar
• van der Lann, M. J., Dudoit, S., Pollard, K. S. (2004). Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 3(1): Article 15.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Xu, X. (2012). Step-up procedure controlling generalized family-wise error rate. Statistics & Probability Letters 82:775–782.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Xu, X. (2015). Bonferroni-type plug-in procedure controlling generalized familywise error rate. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 44:3042–3055.
   Google Scholar