223
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effects of gamma noise on quality improvement

&
Pages 1783-1797 | Received 27 Feb 2018, Accepted 23 Jul 2018, Published online: 07 Nov 2018

References

  • Abraham, A. A., T. J. Robinson, and C. M. Anderson-Cook. 2009. A graphical approach for assessing optimal operating conditions in robust design. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 6 (3):235–53.
  • Atapattu, S., C. Tellambura, and H. Jiang. 2011. A mixture gamma distribution to model the SNR of wireless channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 10 (12):4193–203.
  • Bashiri, M., A. Moslemi, and S. T. Akhavan Niaki. 2017. Robust multi-response surface optimization: A posterior preference approach. International Transactions in Operational Research. doi:10.1111/itor.12450.
  • Bingham, D., and V. N. Nair. 2012. Noise variable settings in robust design experiments. Technometrics 54 (4):388–397.
  • Brinkley, P. A., K. P. Meyer, and J. C. Lu. 1996. Combined generalized linear modelling/non-linear programming approach to robust process design: a case-study in circuit board quality improvement. Applied Statistics- Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 45 (1):99–110.
  • Box, G. E. P., and K. B. Wilson. 1951. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 13 :1–45.
  • Brenneman, W. A., and W. R. Myers. 2003. Robust parameter design with categorical noise variables. Journal of Quality Technology 35 (4):335–41.
  • Cho, B. R., and C. Park. 2005. Robust design modeling and optimization with unbalanced data. Computers & Industrial Engineering 48 (2):173–80.
  • Copeland, K. A., and P. R. Nelson. 1996. Dual response optimization via direct function minimization. Journal of Quality Technology 28 (3):331–6.
  • Del Castillo, E., and D. C. Montgomery. 1993. A nonlinear programming solution to the dual response problem. Journal of Quality Technology 25 (3):199–204.
  • Gradshteyn, I. S., and I. M. Ryzhik. 2007. Table of integrals, series and products, 7th ed. New York, NY: Academic Pres, 365.
  • Hamada, M., and J. A. Nelder. 1997. Generalized linear models for quality-improvement experiments. Journal of Quality Technology 29 (3):292–304.
  • Hanson, L., and R. Vogel. 2008. The probability distribution of daily rainfall in the United States. Honolulu, Hawaii: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress.
  • Kackar, R. N. 1985. Discussion of off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method. Journal of Quality Technology 17 (4):176–206.
  • Kim, K., and D. K. J. Lin. 1998. Dual response surface optimization: A fuzzy modeling approach. Journal of Quality Technology 30 (1):1–10.
  • Köksoy, O. 2006. Multiresponse robust design: Mean Square Error (MSE criterion). Applied Mathematics and Computation 175 (2):1716–29.
  • Köksoy, O., and N. Doganaksoy. 2003. Joint optimization of mean and standard deviation in response surface experimentation. Journal of Quality Technology 35 (3):239–52.
  • Köksoy, O., and S.-K. S. Fan. 2012. An upside-down normal loss function-based method for quality improvement. Engineering Optimization 44 (8):935–45.
  • Leung, B. P. K., and F. A. Spiring. 2004. Some properties of the family of inverted probability loss functions. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 1 (1):125–47.
  • Lin, D. K. J., and W. Tu. 1995. Dual response surface. Journal of Quality Technology 27 (1):34–9.
  • Lucas, J. M. 1994. How to achieve a robust process using response surface methodology. Journal of Quality Technology 26 (4):248–60.
  • Myers, R. H. 1976. Response surface methodology. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Edwards Brothers, Inc.
  • Myers, R. H., and D. C. Montgomery, 1997. A tutorial on generalized linear models. Journal of Quality Technology 29 (3):274–91.
  • Myers, W. R., W. A. Brenneman, and R. H. Myers, 2005. A dual response approach to robust parameter design for a generalized linear model. Journal of Quality Technology 37 (2):130–8.
  • Myers, R. H., D. C. Montgomery, and C. Anderson-Cook. 2009. Response surface methodology. Canada: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Nair, V. N., B. Abraham, J. MacKay, G. Box, R. N. Kacker, T. J. Lorenzen, J. M. Lucas, R. H. Myers, G. G. Vining, J. A. Nelder, et al. 1992. Taguchi’s parameter design: A panel discussion. Technometrics 34 (2):127–61.
  • Nelder, J. A., and Y. Lee, 1991. Generalized linear models for the analysis of Taguchi-type experiments. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis 7 (1):107–20.
  • Park, C., and B. R. Cho, 2003. Development of robust design under the contaminated and non-normal data. Quality Engineering 15 (3):463–9.
  • Peppas, K. P., H. E. Nistazakis, and G. S. Tombras. 2011. An overview of the physical insight and the various performance metrics of fading channels in wireless communication systems. In Advanced trends in wireless communications, ed Dr. Mutamed Khatib. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.
  • Sharma, M. A., and J. B. Singh, 2010. Use of probability distribution in rainfall analysis. New York Science Journal 3 :40–9.
  • Shoemaker, A. C., K. L. Tsui, and C. F. J. Wu, 1991. Economical experimentation methods for robust parameter design. Technometrics 33 (4):415–27.
  • Stamenovic, G., S. R. Panic, D. Rancic, C. Stefanovic, and M. Stefanovic, 2014. Performance analysis of wireless communication system in general fading environment subjected to shadowing and interference. Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2014 (1):1–8.
  • Taguchi, G. 1986. Introduction to quality engineering: Designing quality into products and processes. Tokyo, Japan: Asian Productivity Organization.
  • Vining, G. G., and R. H. Myers, 1990. Combining taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology 22 (1):38–45.
  • Zeybek, M., and O. Köksoy, 2016. Optimization of correlated multi-response quality engineering by the upside-down normal loss function. Engineering Optimization 48 (8):1419–31.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.