Randomized quasi-random sampling/importance resampling

References

• Cranley, R., and T. N. L. Patterson. 1976. Randomization of number theoretic methods for multiple integration. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 13 (6):904–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K., F. J. Hickernell, and H. Niederreiter, eds. 2002. Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods 2000. Proceedings of a conference held at Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China, November 27–December 1, 2000. Berlin and New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, K., and R. Li. 1999. Bayesian statistical inference on elliptical matrix distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 70 (1):66–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K., and Y. Wang. 1994. Number-theoretic methods in statistics. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, K., and Y. Zhang. 1990. Generalized multivariate analysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, D. B. Dunson, A. Vehtari, and D. B. Rubin. 2013. Bayesian data analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, M., and N. Chopin. 2015. Sequential quasi Monte Carlo. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 77 (3):509–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givens, G. H., and A. E. Raftery. 1996. Local adaptive importance sampling for multivariate densities with strong nonlinear relationships. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (433):132–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halton, J. H. 1960. On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numerische Mathematik 2 (1):84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hickernell, F. J., and R. Yue. 2000. The mean square discrepancy of scrambled (t,s)-sequences. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 38 (4):1089–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlawka, E., and R. Mück. 1972. Über eine transformation von gleichverteilten folgen II. Computing 9 (2):127–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz, S. 1975. Multivariate distributions at a cross road. In Patil, G. P., Kotz, S., and Ord, J. K., editors, Modern course on statistical distributions in scientific work, 247–270. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• L'Ecuyer, P., and C. Lemieux. 2002. Recent advances in randomized quasi-monte carlo methods. In Modeling uncertainty, edited by S. Yakowitz, M. Dror, P. L'Ecuyer, and F. Szidarovszky, volume 46 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, 419–474. Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers
   Google Scholar
• L'Ecuyer, P., and A. B. Owen, eds. 2009. Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo methods 2008. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, J., R. Li, H. Fang, and K. Fang. 2000. Testing multinormality based on low-dimensional projection. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 86 (1):129–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., and J. A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed.
   Google Scholar
• Nuyens, D. 2014. The construction of good lattice rules and polynomial lattice rules. In Uniform distribution and quasi-Monte Carlo methods (Radon series on computational and applied mathematics), edited by P. Kritzer, 1865–3707. Berlin, Germany: DE GRUYTER.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, A. B. 1997. Monte carlo variance of scrambled net quadrature. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 34 (5):1884–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PéRez, C. J., J. MartíN, M. J. Rufo, and C. Rojano. 2005. Quasi-random sampling importance resampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 34 (1):97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, C. P., and G. Casella. 2004. Monte Carlo statistical methods: Springer texts in statistics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, M. 1952. Remarks on a multivariate transformation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23 (3):470–2.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. 1987. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation: Comment: A noniterative sampling/importance resampling alternative to the data augmentation algorithm for creating a few imputations when fractions of missing information are modest: The SIR algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82 (398):543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skare, O., E. Bolviken, and L. Holden. 2003. Improved sampling-importance resampling and reduced bias importance sampling. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 30 (4):719–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. F. M., and A. E. Gelfand. 1992. Bayesian statistics without tear: A sampling-resampling perspective. The American Statistician 46 (2):84–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol', I. M. 1967. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics 7 (4):86–112.
   Google Scholar
• Tuffin, B. 2004. Randomization of Quasi-Monte Carlo methods for error estimation: Survey and normal approximation. Monte Carlo Methods and Applications 10 (3–4):617–28.
   Google Scholar
• Vandewoestyne, B., and R. Cools. 2010. On the convergence of quasi-random sampling/importance resampling. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 81 (3):490–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar