184
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Designing of an attribute control chart based on modified multiple dependent state sampling using accelerated life test under Weibull distribution

, , &
Pages 902-916 | Received 05 Aug 2018, Accepted 08 Jan 2019, Published online: 10 Feb 2019

References

  • Arshad, A., M. Azam, M. Aslam, and C. H. Jun. 2018. A control chart for monitoring process variation using multiple dependent state sampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 47 (8):2216–33. doi:10.1080/03610918.2017.1341524.
  • Aslam, M., and C. H. Jun. 2015. Attribute control charts for the Weibull distribution under truncated life tests. Quality Engineering 27 (3):283–8. doi:10.1080/08982112.2015.1017649.
  • Aslam, M., O. H. Arif, and C. H. Jun. 2017. An attribute control chart for a Weibull distribution under accelerated hybrid censoring. PLoS One 12 (3):1–11.
  • Aslam, M., L. Ahmad, C. H. Jun, and O. H. Arif. 2016. A control chart for COM- Poisson distribution using multiple dependent state sampling. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32 (8):2803–12. doi:10.1002/qre.1965.
  • Aslam, M., M. Azam, N. Khan, and C. H. Jun. 2015a. A control chart for an exponential distribution using multiple dependent state sampling. Quality & Quantity 49 (2):455–62. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0002-2.
  • Aslam, M., A. Nazir, and C.-H. Jun. 2015b. A new attribute control chart using multiple dependent state sampling. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 37 (4):569–76. doi:10.1177/0142331214549094.
  • Balamurali, S., P. Jeyadurga, and M. Usha. 2017. Optimal designing of multiple deferred state sampling plan for assuring percentile life under Weibull distribution. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 93 (9–12):3095–109. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0707-1.
  • Hamada, M. S. 2015. Bayesian analysis of step-stress accelerated life tests and its use in planning. Quality Engineering 27 (3):276–82. doi:10.1080/08982112.2015.1038357.
  • Jeyadurga, P., and S. Balamurali. 2018. Evaluation of an np control chart under truncated life test using quick switching sampling system. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 40 (12):3407–14. doi:10.1177/0142331217721314.
  • Jiang, M., and W. Chen. 2015. Integrated approach for field reliability prediction based on accelerated life testing. Quality Engineering 27 (3):317–28. doi:10.1080/08982112.2015.1036293.
  • Melo, M. S., L. L. Ho, and P. G. Medeiros. 2017. A 2-stage attribute-variable control chart to monitor a vector of process means. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 33 (7):1589–99. doi:10.1002/qre.2127.
  • Moura, E. C. 1992. A method to estimate the acceleration factor for subassemblies. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 41 (3):396–9. doi:10.1109/24.159805.
  • Pourtaheri, R. 2017. Three-level control charts with variable sample size, sampling interval, and control limits. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 46 (4):1927–40. doi:10.1080/03610926.2015.1030426.
  • Psarakis, S. 2015. Adaptive control charts: Recent developments and extensions. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 31 (7):1265–80. doi:10.1002/qre.1850.
  • Wortham, A. W., and R. C. Baker. 1976. Multiple deferred state sampling inspection. International Journal of Production Research 14 (6):719–31. doi:10.1080/00207547608956391.
  • Wu, C. W., and Z. H. Wang. 2017. Developing a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan with simultaneous consideration of process yield and quality loss. International Journal of Production Research 55 (8):2351–64. doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1244360.
  • Wu, C. W., A. H. I. Lee, and C. C. C. Chien. 2017. A variables multiple dependent state sampling plan based on a one-sided process capability index. Quality Engineering 29 (4):719–29. doi:10.1080/08982112.2017.1288913.
  • Zhu, H., C. Zhang, and Y. Deng. 2016. Optimisation design of attribute control charts for multi-station manufacturing system subjected to quality shifts. International Journal of Production Research 54 (6):1804–21. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1076190.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.