Two-stage sampling plan using process loss index under neutrosophic statistics

References

• Aslam, M. 2018a. A new sampling plan using neutrosophic process loss consideration. Symmetry 10 (5):132. doi:10.3390/sym10050132.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M. 2018b. Design of sampling plan for exponential distribution under neutrosophic statistical interval method. IEEE Access 6:64153–8. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M. 2019a. A new failure-censored reliability test using neutrosophic statistical interval method. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 21 (4):1214–20. doi:10.1007/s40815-018-0588-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M. 2019b. Product acceptance determination with measurement error using the neutrosophic statistics. Advances in Fuzzy Systems 2019:8953051. doi:10.1155/2019/8953051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M. A. 2019c. New attribute sampling plan using neutrosophic statistical interval method. Complex & Intelligent Systems 5 (4):365–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., M. Azam, Y. L. Lio, and C.-H. Jun. 2013. Two-stage group acceptance sampling plan for Burr Type X percentiles. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 41 (4):20120209–533. doi:10.1520/JTE20120209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., and O. Arif. 2018. Testing of grouped product for the weibull distribution using neutrosophic statistics. Symmetry 10 (9):403. doi:10.3390/sym10090403.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., Y. L. Lio, M. Azam, and C.-H. Jun. 2012. Two-stage improved group sampling plans for Burr Type XII distributions. American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 2 (3):33–9. doi:10.5923/j.ajms.20120203.04.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., and M. A. Raza. 2019. Design of new sampling plans for multiple manufacturing lines under uncertainty. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 21 (3):978–92. doi:10.3233/JIFS-182849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C.-H. Yen, C.-H. Chang, and C.-H. Jun. 2013. Multiple states repetitive group sampling plans with process loss consideration. Applied Mathematical Modelling 37 (20-21):9063–75. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2013.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C.-H. Yen, C.-H. Chang, and C.-H. Jun. 2014. Multiple dependent state variable sampling plans with process loss consideration. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 71 (5-8):1337–43. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5574-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C.-H. Yen, C.-H. Chang, C.-H. Jun, M. Ahmad, and M. Rasool. 2012. Two-stage variables acceptance sampling plans using process loss functions. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 41 (20):3633–47. doi:10.1080/03610926.2011.563019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam, M., C.-H. Yen, and C.-H. Jun. 2011. Variable repetitive group sampling plans with process loss consideration. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 81 (11):1417–32. doi:10.1080/00949655.2010.487826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azam, M., M. Aslam, S. Balamurali, and A. Javaid. 2015. Two stage group acceptance sampling plan for half normal percentiles. Journal of King Saud University - Science 27 (3):239–43. doi:10.1016/j.jksus.2015.03.009.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and C.-H. Jun. 2006. Repetitive group sampling procedure for variables inspection. Journal of Applied Statistics 33 (3):327–38. doi:10.1080/02664760500446010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, N. G., and S. K. Mitra. 1964. The effect of non-normality on sampling inspection. Sankhya 26 (2):169–76.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. J. 1986. Quality control and industrial statistics. 5th ed. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther, W. C. 1969. Use of the binomial, hypergeometric, and Poisson tables to obtain sampling plans. Journal of Quality Technology 1 (2):105–9. doi:10.1080/00224065.1969.11980358.
   Google Scholar
• Jamkhaneh, E. B., B. Sadeghpour-Gildeh, and G. Yari. 2011. Inspection error and its effects on single sampling plans with fuzzy parameters. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 43:555–60. doi:10.1007/s00158-010-0579-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett, W. J., and B. L. Welch. 1939. The control of proportion defective as judged by a single quality characteristic varying on a continuous scale. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 6:80–8. doi:10.2307/2983626.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. 1992. The relationship of Cpm to squared error loss. Journal of Quality Technology 23:17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., E. T. Bekar, and O. Senvar. 2016. A fuzzy design of single and double acceptance sampling plans. In intelligent decision making in quality management, 179–211. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kanagawa, A., and H. Ohta. 1990. A design for single sampling attribute plan based on fuzzy sets theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 37 (2):173–81. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(90)90040-D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, J. H. K. 1971. MIL-STD-414: Sampling procedures and tables for inspection by variables for percent defective. Journal of Quality Technology 3 (1):28–37. doi:10.1080/00224065.1971.11980456.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2007. Introduction to statistical quality control. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pearn, W.-L., and C.-W. Wu. 2006. Variables sampling plans with PPM fraction of defectives and process loss consideration. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (4):450–9. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., and C.-W. Wu. 2007. An effective decision making method for product acceptance. Omega 35 (1):12–21. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2005.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raju, S. R. K. 1997. Symbolic data analysis in cardiology. In Symbolic data analysis and its applications, ed. E. Diday and K. C. Gowda, 245–9. Paris: CEREMADE.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghpour Gildeh, B., E. Baloui Jamkhaneh, G. Yari. 2011. Acceptance single sampling plan with fuzzy parameter. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems 8:47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, E. G. 1982. Acceptance sampling in quality control. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seifi, S., and M. S. F. Nezhad. 2017. Variable sampling plan for resubmitted lots based on process capability index and Bayesian approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 88 (9-12):2547–55. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-8958-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senturk, S., and N. Erginel. 2009. Development of fuzzy X¯-R and X¯- S control charts using α-cuts. Information Sciences 179:1542–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smarandache, F. 2014. Introduction to neutrosophic statistics. Conshohocken, PA: Infinite Study.
   Google Scholar
• Smarandache, F. 2010. Neutrosophic logic-a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy logic. In Multispace & multistructure. Neutrosophic transdisciplinarity (100 collected papers of science), vol. 4, p. 396.
   Google Scholar
• Sukparungsee, S. 2018. Robustness of generally weighted moving average signed-rank control chart for monitoring a shift of skew processes. MATTER: International Journal of Science and Technology 4 (3):125–37. doi:10.20319/mijst.2018.43.125137.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, X., and Z. Wang. 2012. Fuzzy acceptance sampling plans for inspection of geospatial data with ambiguity in quality characteristics. Computers & Geosciences 48:256–66. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turanoğlu, E., İ. Kaya, and C. Kahraman. 2012. Fuzzy acceptance sampling and characteristic curves. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 5:13–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uma, G., and K. Ramya. 2015. Impact of fuzzy logic on acceptance sampling plans—A review. Automation and Autonomous System 7:181–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., X. Zhou, X. Yuan, L. Wang, and D. Huang. 2015. Acceptance sampling plan of quality inspection for ocean dataset. Journal of Spatial Science 60 (2):329–39. doi:10.1080/14498596.2015.1030790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, A., and S. Liu. 2016. Designing a repetitive group sampling plan for Weibull distributed processes. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2016:1. doi:10.1155/2016/5862071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, A., S. Liu, and M. Azam. 2017. Designing a multiple state repetitive group sampling plan based on the coefficient of variation. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 46 (9):7154–65. doi:10.1080/03610918.2016.1230214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, C.-H., and C.-H. Chang. 2009. Designing variables sampling plans with process loss consideration. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 38 (8):1579–91. doi:10.1080/03610910903046809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar