116
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Accounting for matching structure in post-matching analysis of observational studies

&
Pages 3081-3099 | Received 26 Sep 2018, Accepted 18 Dec 2019, Published online: 12 Jan 2020

References

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2016. Overview of the nationwide emergency department sample (NEDS). www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nedsoverview.jsp.
  • Agresti, A. 2002. Categorical data analysis. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Agresti, A., and Y. Min. 2004. Effects and non-effects of paired identical observations in comparing proportions with binary matched-pairs data. Statistics in Medicine 23 (1):65–75. doi:10.1002/sim.1589.
  • Austin, P. C. 2010. A data-generation process for data with specified risk differences or numbers needed to treat. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 39 (3):563–77. doi:10.1080/03610910903528301.
  • Austin, P. C. 2011a. Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine 30 (11):1292–301. doi:10.1002/sim.4200.
  • Austin, P. C. 2011b. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharmaceutical Statistics 10 (2):150–61. doi:10.1002/pst.433.
  • Austin, P. C., and M. M. Mamdani. 2006. A comparison of propensity score methods: A case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use. Statistics in Medicine 25 (12):2084–106. doi:10.1002/sim.2328.
  • Chen, J. 1996. On the conditional and mixture model approaches for matched pairs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 55 (3):319–29. doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(96)00080-8.
  • Gail, M., W.-Y. Tan, and S. Piantadosi. 1988. Tests for no treatment effect in randomized clinical trials. Biometrika 75 (1):57–64. doi:10.1093/biomet/75.1.57.
  • Gail, M. H., S. Wieand, and S. Piantadosi. 1984. Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariates. Biometrika 71 (3):431–44. doi:10.1093/biomet/71.3.431.
  • Greenland, S., J. M. Robins, and J. Pearl. 1999. Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Statistical Science 14 (1): 29–46. doi:10.1214/ss/1009211805.
  • Hansen, B. B., and S. O. Klopfer. 2006. Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15 (3):609–27. doi:10.1198/106186006X137047.
  • Ho, D. E., K. Imai, G. King, and E. A. Stuart. 2007. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis 15 (3):199–236. doi:10.1093/pan/mpl013.
  • Imbens, G. W., and D. B. Rubin. 2015. Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kang, J. D., and J. L. Schafer. 2007. Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Statistical Science 22 (4):523–39. doi:10.1214/07-STS227.
  • Lin, D. Y., and L.-J. Wei. 1989. The robust inference for the cox proportional hazards model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 84 (408):1074–8. doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478874.
  • Lunceford, J. K., and M. Davidian. 2004. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study. Statistics in Medicine 23 (19):2937–60. doi:10.1002/sim.1903.
  • Pang, M., J. S. Kaufman, and R. W. Platt. 2016. Studying noncollapsibility of the odds ratio with marginal structural and logistic regression models. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 25 (5):1925–37. doi:10.1177/0962280213505804.
  • Pimentel, S. D., R. R. Kelz, J. H. Silber, and P. R. Rosenbaum. 2015. Large, sparse optimal matching with refined covariate balance in an observational study of the health outcomes produced by new surgeons. Journal of the American Statistical Association 110 (510):515–27. doi:10.1080/01621459.2014.997879.
  • Rosenbaum, P. R. 1991. A characterization of optimal designs for observational studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 53 (3):597–610. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01848.x.
  • Rosenbaum, P. R. 2002. Observational studies. New York: Springer.
  • Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 (1):41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
  • Rubin, D. B. 1973. The use of matched sampling and regression adjustment to remove bias in observational studies. Biometrics 29 (1):185–203. doi:10.2307/2529685.
  • Rubin, D. B. 2001. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2 (3/4):169–88.
  • Saposnik, G., M. K. Kapral, R. Cote, P. A. Rochon, J. Wang, S. Raptis, M. Mamdani, and S. E. Black. 2012. Is pre-existing dementia an independent predictor of outcome after stroke? A propensity score-matched analysis. Journal of Neurology 259 (11):2366–75. doi:10.1007/s00415-012-6508-4.
  • Shi, J., B. Lu, K. K. Wheeler, and H. Xiang. 2016. Unmeasured confounding in observational studies with multiple treatment arms: Comparing emergency department mortality of severe trauma patients by trauma center level. Epidemiology 27 (5):624–32. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000515.
  • Stuart, E. A. 2010. Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science 25 (1):1–21. doi:10.1214/09-STS313.
  • Zou, G. 2004. A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. American Journal of Epidemiology 159 (7):702–6. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh090.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.