On missing random effects in machine learning

References

• Alwosheel, A., S. V. Cranenburgh, and C. G. Chorus. 2018. Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis. Journal of Choice Modelling 28:167–82. doi:10.1016/j.jocm.2018.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, F., A. Kordon, J. Sweeney, and W. Zirk. 2005. Using genetic programming in industrial statistical model building. In Genetic programming theory and practice II, ed. U. O'Reilly, T. Yu: R. Riolo and B. Worzel, 31–48. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, J. A. 2002. Experiments with mixtures: Designs, models, and the analysis of mixture data. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Czitrom, V. 1988. Mixture experiments with process variables: D-optimal orthogonal experimental designs. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 17 (1):105–21. doi:10.1080/03610928808829613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dundar, M., B. Krishnapuram, J. Bi, and R. B. Rao. 2007. Learning classifiers: When the training data is not IID. IJCAI 2007:756–61. Accessed January 16, 2019. https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/07.
   Google Scholar
• Fokkema, M., N. Smits, A. Zeileis, T. Hothorn, and H. Kelderman. 2018. Detecting treatment-subgroup interactions in clustered data with generalized linear mixed-effects model trees. Behavior Research Methods 50 (5):2016–34. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0971-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, W., and J. S. Simonoff. 2015. Unbiased regression trees for longitudinal and clustered data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 88:53–74. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2015.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, P., and A. N. Donev. 2006. The D-Optimal design of blocked experiments with mixture components. Journal of Quality Technology 38 (4):319–32. doi:10.1080/00224065.2006.11918621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotwalt, C. M. 2019. JMP neural network methodology. White Paper Series. SAS Institute. Accessed January 16, 2019. https://community.jmp.com.
   Google Scholar
• Hajjem, A., D. Larocque, and F. Bellavance. 2017. Generalized mixed effects regression trees. Statistics & Probability Letters 126:114–8. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2017.02.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajjem, A., F. Bellavance, and D. Larocque. 2011. Mixed effects regression trees of clustered data. Statistics & Probability Letters 81 (4):451–9. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2010.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajjem, A., F. Bellavance, and D. Larocque. 2014. Mixed-effects random forest for clustered data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 84 (6):1313–28. doi:10.1080/00949655.2012.741599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, D. A., M. J. Ignatowich, M. Caracotsios, J. D. Sheehan, and F. D'Ottaviano. 2019. Nonlinear mixed-effects models for kinetic parameter estimation with batch reactor data. Chemical Engineering Journal 377:119817. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordon, A. 2010. Applying computational intelligence: How to create value. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, S., J. A. Cornell, and G. G. Vining. 2000. A new model and class designs for mixture experiments with process variables. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 29 (9-10):2255–80. doi:10.1080/03610920008832606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekivetz, R., and B. Jones. 2015. Fast flexible space‐filling designs for nonrectangular regions. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 31 (5):829–37. doi:10.1002/qre.1640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piepel, G. F., and J. A. Cornell. 1994. Mixture experiment approaches: Examples, discussion, and recommendations. Journal of Quality Technology 26 (3):177–96. doi:10.1080/00224065.1994.11979525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, U. K., K. Lal, S. Dash, and K. N. Singh. 2017. Design and analysis of mixture experiments with process variable. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 46 (1):259–70. doi:10.1080/03610926.2014.990104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott, P. 2004. Modelling in mixture experiments including interactions with process variables. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 1 (1):87–103. doi:10.1080/16843703.2004.11673066.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe-Hesketh, S., and A. Skrondal. 2008. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using strata. 2nd ed. College Station: Strata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J., and A. Penlidis. 2018. Computational package for copolymerization reactivity ratio estimation: Improved acess to error-in-variables-model. Processes 6 (1):8. doi:10.3390/pr6010008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sela, R. J., and J. S. Simonoff. 2012. RE-EM trees: A data mining approach for longitudinal and clustered data. Machine Learning 86 (2):169–207. doi:10.1007/s10994-011-5258-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speiser, J. L., B. J. Wolf, D. Chung, C. J. Karvellas, D. G. Koch, and V. L. Durkalski. 2019. BiMM forest: A random forest method for modeling clustered and longitudinal binary outcomes. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems: An International Journal Sponsored by the Chemometrics Society 185:122–34. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speiser, J. L., B. J. Wolf, D. Chung, C. J. Karvellas, D. G. Koch, and V. L. Durkalski. 2020. BiMM tree: A decision tree method for modeling clustered and longitudinal binary outcomes. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation 49 (4):1004–23. doi:10.1080/03610918.2018.1490429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroup, W. W. 2013. Generalized linear mixed models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vladislavleva, E. 2008. Model-based problem solving through symbolic regression via pareto genetic programming. Dissertation, Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg: TiSEM. Accessed January 16, 2019. https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/1024045.
   Google Scholar