Penalized power properties of the normality tests in the presence of outliers

References

• Anderson, T. W., and D. A. Darling. 1954. A test of goodness-of-fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49 (268):765–69. doi:10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrio, E., J. A. Cuesta-Albertos, C. Matran, and J. M. Rodriguez-Rodriguez. 1999. Tests of goodness of fit based on the L2-Wasserstein distance. The Annals of Statistics 27:1230–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonett, D. G., and E. Seier. 2002. A test of normality with high uniform power. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 40 (3):435–45. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00074-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. V. 1978. Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 31 (2):144–52. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1978.tb00581.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brys, G., M. Hubert, and A. Struyf. 2003. A comparison of some new measures of skewness. In Developments in Robust Statistics, 98–113.
   Google Scholar
• Brys, G., M. Hubert, and A. Struyf. 2008. Goodness-of-fit tests based on a robust measure of skewness. Computational Statistics 23 (3):429–42. doi:10.1007/s00180-007-0083-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavus, M., B. Yazici, and A. Sezer. 2018. Analyzing regional export data by the modified generalized F-test. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies 541–52. doi:10.18092/ulikidince.348070.
   Google Scholar
• Cavus, M., B. Yazici, and A. Sezer. 2019. Penalized power of the test approach to compare the power of the tests when Type I error probabilities are different. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1588310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavus, M., and B. Yazici. 2020. Testing the equality of normal distributed and independent groups’ means under unequal variances by Doex package. The R Journal 12 (2):134–54. doi:10.32614/RJ-2021-008.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and S. S. Shapiro. 1995. An alternative test for normality based on normalized spacings. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 53 (3–4):269–87. doi:10.1080/00949659508811711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doornik, J. A., and H. Hansen. 2008. An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 70:927–39. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00537.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel, Y. R., W. Miao, and J. L. Gastwirth. 2007. Robust directed tests of normality against heavy-tailed alternatives. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51 (5):2734–46. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel, Y. R., and J. L. Gastwirth. 2008. A robust modification of the Jarque–Bera test of normality. Economics Letters 99 (1):30–32. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2007.05.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarque, C. M., and A. K. Bera. 1987. A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique 55 (2):163–72. doi:10.2307/1403192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafaye de Micheaux, P., and V. A. Tran. 2016. PoweR: A reproducible research tool to ease Monte-Carlo power simulation studies for goodness-of-fit tests in R. Journal of Statistical Software 69 (3):1–42. doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliefors, H. W. 1967. On the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62 (318):399–544. doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantalos, P., A. Karagrigoriou, L. Střelec, P. Jordanova, P. Hermann, J. Kiseľák, J. Hudák, and M. Stehlík. 2020. On improved volatility modelling by fitting skewness in ARCH models. Journal of Applied Statistics 47 (6):1031–63. doi:10.1080/02664763.2019.1671323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, W.-D., L. Střelec, H. Ahmadinezhad, and M. Stehlík. 2017. Geometric aspects of robust testing for normality and sphericity. Stochastic Analysis and Applications 35 (3):511–32. doi:10.1080/07362994.2016.1273785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romao, X., R. Delgado, and A. Costa. 2010. An empirical power comparisons of univariate goodness-of-fit tests for normality. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 80 (5):545–91. doi:10.1080/00949650902740824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saculinggan, M., and E. A. Balase. 2013. Empirical power comparison of goodness of fit tests for normality in the presence of outliers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 435:012041–11. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/435/1/012041.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., and R. S. Francia. 1972. An approximate analysis of variance test for normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 67 (337):215–16. doi:10.1080/01621459.1972.10481232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., and M. B. Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 52 (3–4):591–611. doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., M. B. Wilk, and H. J. Chen. 1968. A comparative study of various tests for normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63 (324):1343–72. doi:10.1080/01621459.1968.10480932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thadewald, T., and H. Buning. 2007. Jarque-Bera test and its competitors for testing normality-a power comparison. Journal of Applied Statistics 34 (1):87–105. doi:10.1080/02664760600994539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, B. W., and C. H. Sim. 2011. Comparisons of various types of normality tests. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 81 (12):2141–55. doi:10.1080/00949655.2010.520163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, T. W. 2015. Vector generalized linear and additive models: With an implementation in R. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yazici, B., and S. Yolacan. 2007. A comparison of various tests of normality. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 77 (2):175–83. doi:10.1080/10629360600678310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar