Modeling and predicting Chinese stock downside risks via Gaussian mixture models and marked self-exciting point process

References

• Bauwens, L., and D. Veredas. 2004. The stochastic conditional duration model: A latent variable model for the analysis of financial durations. Journal of Econometrics 119 (2):381–412. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00201-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauwens, L., and P. Giot. 2000. The logarithmic ACD model: An application to the bid-ask quote process of three NYSE stocks. Annales D’Economie et de Statistique 60:117–49. doi: 10.2307/20076257.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, L., and P. Giot. 2003. Asymmetric ACD models: Introducing price information in ACD models with a two state transition model. Empirical Economics 28 (4):709–31. doi: 10.1007/s00181-003-0155-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, L., P. Giot, J. Grammig, and D. Veredas. 2004. A comparison of financial duration models via density forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting 20 (4):589–609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2003.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauwens, L., S. Laurent, and J. V. K. Rombouts. 2006. Multivariate GARCH models: A survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics 21 (1):79–109. doi: 10.1002/jae.842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreau, J., and Y. Bengio. 2009. A hybrid Pareto model for asymmetric fat-tailed data: The univariate case. Extremes 12 (1):53–76. doi: 10.1007/s10687-008-0068-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez-Demoulin, V., A. C. Davison, and A. J. McNeil. 2005. Estimating value-at-risk: A point process approach. Quantitative Finance 5 (2):227–34. doi: 10.1080/14697680500039613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez-Demoulin, V., and J. A. McGill. 2012. High-frequency financial data modeling using Hawkes processes. Journal of Banking & Finance 36 (12):3415–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P., M. Xu, S. Xu, and T. Hu. 2017. Modeling and predicting extreme cyber attack rates via marked point processes. Journal of Applied Statistics 44 (14):2534–63. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1257590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, P. F. 1998. Evaluating interval forecasts. International Economic Review 39 (4):841–62. doi: 10.2307/2527341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cont, R. 2001. Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance 1 (2):223–36. doi: 10.1080/713665670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deisenroth, M. P., A. A. Faisal, and C. S. Ong. 2018. Mathematics for machine learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Z., C. W. J. Granger, and R. F. Engle. 1993. A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of Empirical Finance 1 (1):83–106. doi: 10.1016/0927-5398(93)90006-D.
   Google Scholar
• Embrechts, P., C. Kluppelberg, and T. Mikosch. 1997. Modelling extremal events for insurance and finance. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. F. 1982. Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50 (4):987–1007. doi: 10.2307/1912773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. F., and S. Manganelli. 2004. CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 22 (4):367–81. doi: 10.1198/073500104000000370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R., and J. Russell. 1998. Autoregressive conditional duration: A new model for irregularly spaced transaction data. Econometrica 66 (5):1127–62. doi: 10.2307/2999632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghysels, E., and J. Jasiak. 1998. GARCH for irregularly spaced financial data: The ACD-GARCH model. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics Econometrics 2 (4):133–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grammig, J., and K. O. Maurer. 2000. Non-monotonic hazard functions and the autoregressive conditional duration model. The Econometrics Journal 3 (1):16–38. doi: 10.1111/1368-423X.00037.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. R., Z. Huang, and H. H. Shek. 2012. Realized GARCH: A joint model for returns and realized measures of volatility. Journal of Applied Econometrics 27 (6):877–906. doi: 10.1002/jae.1234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, R. 2013. Energy risk management through self-exciting marked point process. Energy Economics 38:64–76. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, R., and B. Schipp. 2013. Value-at-risk forecasts by extreme value models in a conditional duration framework. Journal of Empirical Finance 23:33–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2013.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickinbotham, H. J., and J. Austin. 2000. Neural networks for novelty detection in airframe strain data. Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Como, Italy, Vol. 6, 375–380.
   Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, T., and L. C. Adkins. 2005. Price risk in the NYMEX energy complex: An extreme value approach. Journal of Futures Markets 25 (4):309–37. doi: 10.1002/fut.20150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumazawa, T., and Y. Ogata. 2014. Nonstationary ETAS models for nonstandard earthquakes. The Annals of Applied Statistics 8 (3):1825–52. doi: 10.1214/14-AOAS759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, T. 1990. The econometric analysis of transition data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, S. R., F. F. D. Nascimento, and V. R. D. S. Ferraz. 2018. Regression models for time-varying extremes. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 88 (2):235–49. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2017.1385788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., G. Zhang, S. Ali, X. Wang, G. Wang, Z. Pan, and J. Zhang. 2019. SPI–based drought simulation and prediction using ARMA-GARCH model. Applied Mathematics and Computation 355 (15):96–107. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.02.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, S., P. Karsmakers, and B. Vanrumste. 2014. Anomaly detection using the Poisson process limit for extremes. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Shenzhen, China, 370–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lunde, A. 1999. A generalized gamma autoregressive conditional duration model. Technology Report, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Marimoutou, V., B. Raggad, and A. Trabelsi. 2009. Extreme value theory and value at risk: Application to oil market. Energy Economics 31 (4):519–30. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, P., and M. Alder. 1994. Selecting the optimal number of components for a Gaussian mixture model. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, Trondheim, Norway, Cat. No.94CH3467-8: 393.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, A. J., and R. Frey. 2000. Estimation of tail-related risk measures for heteroscedastic financial time series: An extreme value approach. Journal of Empirical Finance 7 (3–4):271–300. doi: 10.1016/S0927-5398(00)00012-8.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, A. J., R. Frey, and P. Embrechts. 2005. Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. P. 2012. Machine learning: A proabilistic perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nascimento, F. F. D., D. Gamerman, and H. F. Lopes. 2016. Time-varying extreme pattern with dynamic models. Test 25 (1):131–49. doi: 10.1007/s11749-015-0444-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata, Y. 1988. Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83 (401):9–27. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickands, J. 1971. The two-dimensional Poisson process and extremal processes. Journal of Applied Probability 8 (4):745–56. doi: 10.2307/3212238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premaratne, G., and A. Bera. 2005. A test for symmetry with leptokurtic financial data. Journal of Financial Econometrics 3 (2):169–87. doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbi009.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, F., and D. E. Giles. 2010. Extreme value analysis of daily Canadian crude oil prices. Applied Financial Economics 20 (12):941–54. doi: 10.1080/09603101003724323.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D. A., T. F. Quatieri, and R. B. Dunn. 2000. Speaker verification using adapted Gaussian mixture models. Digital Signal Processing 10 (1–3):19–41. doi: 10.1006/dspr.1999.0361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J., and R. Engle. 2005. A discrete-state continuous-time model of financial transactions prices and times. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 23 (2):166–80. doi: 10.1198/073500104000000541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H., D. Yan, N. Zhao, and J. Zhou. 2015. Empirical investigation on modeling solar radiation series with ARMA–GARCH models. Energy Conversion and Management 92 (1):385–95. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taewook, L. 2012. A note on JarqueCBera normality test for ARMA–GARCH innovations. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society 41 (1):37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veredas, D., J. Rodriguez-Poo, and A. Espasa. 2002. On the (intradaily) seasonality of a financial point process. CORE DP 2002/23, UniversitJe catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M. Y., J. R. Russell, and R. S. Tsay. 2001. A nonlinear autoregressive conditional duration model with applications to financial transaction data. Journal of Econometrics 104 (1):179–207. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00063-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar