Different thresholding methods on Nearest Shrunken Centroid algorithm

References

• Alizadeh, A. A., M. B. Eisen, R. E. Davis, C. Ma, I. S. Lossos, A. Rosenwald, J. C. Boldrick, H. Sabet, T. Tran, X. Yu, and, et al. 2000. Distinct types of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 403 (6769):503–11. doi:10.1038/35000501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. A., J. E. Staunton, L. B. Silverman, R. Pieters, M. L. den Boer, M. D. Minden, S. E. Sallan, E. S. Lander, T. R. Golub, S. J. Korsmeyer, and, et al. 2002. MLL translocations specify a distinct gene expression profile that distinguishes a unique leukemia. Nature Genetics 30 (1):41–7. doi:10.1038/ng765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, D. G., S. L. R. Kardia, C.-C. Huang, T. J. Giordano, A. M. Levin, D. E. Misek, L. Lin, G. Chen, T. G. Gharib, D. G. Thomas, et al. 2002. Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Nature Medicine 8 (8):816–24. doi:10.1038/nm733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee, A., W. G. Richards, J. Staunton, C. Li, S. Monti, P. Vasa, C. Ladd, J. Beheshti, R. Bueno, M. Gillette, and, et al. 2001. Classification of human lung carcinomas by mrna expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (24):13790–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.191502998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, P. 1983. Minimax estimation of the mean of a normal distribution subject to doing well at a point. In Recent advances in statistics, Pap. in Honor of H. Chernoff, 511–28. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 1996. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24 (2):123–40. doi:10.1007/BF00058655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45 (1):5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-C., and C.-J. Lin. 2011. Libsvm: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2 (3):1–27. doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T., and C. Guestrin. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceeding of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining KDD’16, 785–94. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785.
   Google Scholar
• Donoho, D. L., and J. M. Johnstone. 1994. Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81 (3):425–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J. 1996. Test of significance based on wavelet thresholding and Neyman’s truncation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (434):674–88. doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., and Y. Fan. 2008. High-dimensional classification using features annealed independence rules. Annals of Statistics 36 (6):2605–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., R. Li, M. Sanz-Sole, J. Soria, J. L. Varona, and J. Verdera. 2006. Statistical challenges with high-dimensionality: Feature selection in knowledge discovery. In International congress of mathematicians, Volume III, 595–622. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Freund, Y., and R. E. Schapire. 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 55 (1):119–39. doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2010. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software 33 (1):1–22. doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golub, T. R., D. K. Slonim, P. Tamayo, C. Huard, M. Gaasenbeek, J. P. Mesirov, H. Coller, M. L. Loh, J. R. Downing, M. A. Caligiuri, and, et al. 1999. Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science (New York, N.Y.) 286 (5439):531–7. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héberger, K. 2010. Sum of ranking differences compares methods or models fairly. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 29 (1):101–9. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2009.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héberger, K., and L. Kollár-Hunek. 2011. Sum of ranking differences for method discrimination and its validation: Comparison of ranks with random numbers. Journal of Chemometrics 25 (4):151–8. doi:10.1002/cem.1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, I. M., and B. W. Silverman. 2004. Needles and straw in haystacks: Empirical Bayes estimates of possibly sparse sequences. Annals of Statistics 32:1594–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, J., J. S. Wei, M. Ringnér, L. H. Saal, M. Ladanyi, F. Westermann, F. Berthold, M. Schwab, C. R. Antonescu, C. Peterson, and, et al. 2001. Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nature Medicine 7 (6):673–9. doi:10.1038/89044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., and M. Akritas. 2010. Order thresholding. Annals of Statistics 38 (4):2314–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollr-Hunek, K., and K. Hberger. 2013. Method and model comparison by sum of ranking differences in cases of repeated observations (ties). Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 127:139–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A., and M. Jordan. 2002. On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: A comparsion of logistic regression and Naive Bayes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14:841–8.
   Google Scholar
• Perou, C. M., T. Sørlie, M. B. Eisen, M. van de Rijn, S. S. Jeffrey, C. A. Rees, J. R. Pollack, D. T. Ross, H. Johnsen, L. A. Akslen, and, et al. 2000. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406 (6797):747–52. doi:10.1038/35021093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy, S., P. Tamayo, R. Rifkin, S. Mukherjee, C. H. Yeang, M. Angelo, C. Ladd, M. Reich, E. Latulippe, J. P. Mesirov, and, et al. 2001. Multiclass cancer diagnosis using tumor gene expression signatures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (26):15149–54. doi:10.1073/pnas.211566398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, A. I., J. B. Welsh, L. M. Sapinoso, S. G. Kern, P. Dimitrov, H. Lapp, P. G. Schultz, S. M. Powell, C. A. Moskaluk, H. F. Frierson, and, et al. 2001. Molecular classification of human carcinomas by use of gene expression signatures. Cancer Research 61 (20):7388–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. C., D. Q. Naiman, L. Xu, R. L. Winslow, and D. Geman. 2005. Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21 (20):3896–904. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R., T. Hastie, B. Narasimhan, and G. Chu. 2002. Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 (10):6567–72. doi:10.1073/pnas.082099299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh, E.-J., M. E. Ross, S. A. Shurtleff, W. K. Williams, D. Patel, R. Mahfouz, F. G. Behm, S. C. Raimondi, M. V. Relling, A. Patel, et al. 2002. Classification, subtype discovery, and prediction of outcome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia by gene expression profiling. Cancer Cell 1 (2):133–43. doi:10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00032-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. H. J., Ahn, X. Lin, and C. Park. 2006. Gene selection using support vector machines with non-convex penalty. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 22 (1):88–95. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., H. Wang, Z. Dai, M-s Chen, and Z. Yuan. 2012. Improving accuracy for cancer classification with a new algorithm for genes selection. BMC Bioinformatics 13 (1):298. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar