118
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

A destructive shifted Poisson cure model for interval censored data and an efficient estimation algorithm

&
Pages 2135-2149 | Received 25 Oct 2021, Accepted 06 Apr 2022, Published online: 28 Apr 2022

References

  • Balakrishnan, N., M. V. Koutras, F. S. Milienos, and S. Pal. 2016. Piecewise linear approximations for cure rate models and associated inferential issues. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 18 (4):937–66. doi:10.1007/s11009-015-9477-0.
  • Balakrishnan, N., and S. Pal. 2012. EM algorithm-based likelihood estimation for some cure rate models. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice 6 (4):698–724. doi:10.1080/15598608.2012.719803.
  • Balakrishnan, N., and S. Pal. 2013. Lognormal lifetimes and likelihood-based inference for flexible cure rate models based on COM-Poisson family. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 67:41–67. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2013.04.018.
  • Balakrishnan, N., and S. Pal. 2015a. An EM algorithm for the estimation of parameters of a flexible cure rate model with generalized gamma lifetime and model discrimination using likelihood- and information-based methods. Computational Statistics 30 (1):151–89. doi:10.1007/s00180-014-0527-9.
  • Balakrishnan, N., and S. Pal. 2015b. Likelihood inference for flexible cure rate models with gamma lifetimes. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 44 (19):4007–48. doi:10.1080/03610926.2014.964807.
  • Balakrishnan, N., and S. Pal. 2016. Expectation maximization-based likelihood inference for flexible cure rate models with Weibull lifetimes. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 25 (4):1535–63. doi:10.1177/0962280213491641.
  • Banerjee, S., and B. P. Carlin. 2004. Parametric spatial cure rate models for interval-censored time-to-relapse data. Biometrics 60 (1):268–75. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00032.x.
  • Beretta, A., and C. Heuchenne. 2021. penPHcure: Variable selection in proportional hazards cure model with time-varying covariates. The R Journal 13 (1):116–29. doi:10.32614/RJ-2021-061.
  • Boag, J. W. 1949. Maximum likelihood estimates of the proportion of patients cured by cancer therapy. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 11 (1):15–53. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1949.tb00020.x.
  • Borges, P., J. Rodrigues, and N. Balakrishnan. 2012. Correlated destructive generalized power series cure rate models and associated inference with an application to a cutaneous melanoma data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 56 (6):1703–13. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2011.10.013.
  • Chen, M.-H., J. G. Ibrahim, and D. Sinha. 1999. A new Bayesian model for survival data with a surviving fraction. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (447):909–19. doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474196.
  • Davies, K., S. Pal, and J. A. Siddiqua. 2021. Stochastic EM algorithm for generalized exponential cure rate model and an empirical study. Journal of Applied Statistics 48 (12):2112–35. doi:10.1080/02664763.2020.1786676.
  • Dunn, P. K., and G. K. Smyth. 1996. Randomized quantile residuals. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 5:236–44.
  • Gallardo, D. I., H. Bolfarine, and A. C. Pedroso-de Lima. 2016. An EM algorithm for estimating the destructive weighted Poisson cure rate model. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 86 (8):1497–515. doi:10.1080/00949655.2015.1071375.
  • Kim, Y., and M. Jhun. 2008. Cure rate model with interval censored data. Statistics in Medicine 27 (1):3–14. doi:10.1002/sim.2918.
  • Li, C. S., J. Taylor, and J. P. Sy. 2001. Identifiability of cure models. Statistics & Probability Letters 54 (4):389–95. doi:10.1016/S0167-7152(01)00105-5.
  • Majakwara, J., and S. Pal. 2019. On some inferential issues for the destructive COM-Poisson-generalized gamma regression cure rate model. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 48 (10):3118–42. doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1642483.
  • Maller, R. A., and X. Zhou. 1996. Survival analysis with long-term survivors. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • McLachlan, G. J, and T. Krishnan. 2008. The EM algorithm and extensions. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Pal, S. 2021. A simplified stochastic EM algorithm for cure rate model with negative binomial competing risks: An application to breast cancer data. Statistics in Medicine 40 (28):6387–409. doi:10.1002/sim.9189.
  • Pal, S., and N. Balakrishnan. 2016. Destructive negative binomial cure rate model and EM-based likelihood inference under Weibull lifetime. Statistics & Probability Letters 116:9–20. doi:10.1016/j.spl.2016.04.005.
  • Pal, S., and N. Balakrishnan. 2017a. Expectation maximization algorithm for box-cox transformation cure rate model and assessment of model misspecification under Weibull lifetimes. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 22 (3):926–34. doi:10.1109/JBHI.2017.2704920.
  • Pal, S., and N. Balakrishnan. 2017b. An EM type estimation procedure for the destructive exponentially weighted Poisson regression cure model under generalized gamma lifetime. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 87 (6):1107–29. doi:10.1080/00949655.2016.1247843.
  • Pal, S., and N. Balakrishnan. 2017c. Likelihood inference for the destructive exponentially weighted Poisson cure rate model with Weibull lifetime and an application to melanoma data. Computational Statistics 32 (2):429–49. doi:10.1007/s00180-016-0660-8.
  • Pal, S., and N. Balakrishnan. 2017d. Likelihood inference for COM-Poisson cure rate model with interval-censored data and Weibull lifetimes. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 26 (5):2093–113. doi:10.1177/0962280217708686.
  • Pal, S., and N. Balakrishnan. 2018. Likelihood inference based on EM algorithm for the destructive length-biased Poisson cure rate model with Weibull lifetime. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 47 (3):644–60. doi:10.1080/03610918.2015.1053918.
  • Pal, S., J. Majakwara, and N. Balakrishnan. 2018. An EM algorithm for the destructive COM-Poisson regression cure rate model. Metrika 81 (2):143–71. doi:10.1007/s00184-017-0638-8.
  • Pal, S., and S. Roy. 2020. A new non-linear conjugate gradient algorithm for destructive cure rate model and a simulation study: Illustration with negative binomial competing risks. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation :1–15. (to appear). doi:10.1080/03610918.2020.1819321.
  • Pal, S., and S. Roy. 2021. On the estimation of destructive cure rate model: A new study with exponentially weighted Poisson competing risks. Statistica Neerlandica 75 (3):324–42. doi:10.1111/stan.12237.
  • Peng, Y, and B. Yu. 2021. Cure models: Methods, applications and implementation. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Rodrigues, J., V. G. Cancho, M. de Castro, and N. Balakrishnan. 2012. A Bayesian destructive weighted Poisson cure rate model and an application to a cutaneous melanoma data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 21 (6):585–97. doi:10.1177/0962280210391443.
  • Rodrigues, J., M. de Castro, N. Balakrishnan, and V. G. Cancho. 2011. Destructive weighted Poisson cure rate models. Lifetime Data Analysis 17 (3):333–46. doi:10.1007/s10985-010-9189-2.
  • Rodrigues, J., M. de Castro, V. G. Cancho, and N. Balakrishnan. 2009. COM-Poisson cure rate survival models and an application to a cutaneous melanoma data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139 (10):3605–11. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2009.04.014.
  • Rossi, P. H. R. A. Berk, and K. J. Lenihan. 1980. Money, work and crime. New York: Academic Press.
  • Sy, J. P., and J. Taylor. 2000. Estimation in a Cox proportional hazards cure model. Biometrics 56 (1):227–36. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00227.x.
  • Wang, P., and S. Pal. 2022. A two-way flexible generalized gamma transformation cure rate model. Statistics in Medicine 41 (13):2427–47. doi:10.1002/sim.9363.
  • Wiangnak, P., and S. Pal. 2018. Gamma lifetimes and associated inference for interval-censored cure rate model with COM-Poisson competing cause. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 47 (6):1491–509. doi:10.1080/03610926.2017.1321769.
  • Yakovlev, A. Y, and A. D. Tsodikov. 1996. Stochastic models of tumor latency and their biostatistical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishers.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.