Availability modeling of systems incorporating uncertainty & multiple failure modes using critical repair time & copula

References

• Bao, X., and L. Cui. 2010. An analysis of availability for series Markov repairable system with neglected or delayed failures. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 59 (4):734–43. doi:10.1109/TR.2010.2055915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrade, M. D., P. A. Scarf, C. A. V. Cavalcante, and R. A. Dwight. 2013. Imperfect inspection and replacement of a system with a defective state: A cost and reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 120:80–7. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrade, M. D., P. A. Scarf, and C. A. Cavalcante. 2017. A study of postponed replacement in a delay time model. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 168:70–9. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, J. H., S. Lee, and J. Mi. 2004. Bounding the optimal burn-in time for a system with two types of failure. Naval Research Logistics 51 (8):1090–101. doi:10.1002/nav.20045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantola, N., and S. B. Singh. 2019. The effect of transformer parameters on reliability assessment with the help of health index. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 36 (6):895–916. doi:10.1108/IJQRM-08-2018-0215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. L., and C. C. Chang. 2022. Optimum sequential preventive maintenance first or last policies with imperfect maintenance for a system subject to shocks. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 51 (1):162–78. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. Q., and L. Li. 2012. A geometric process repair model with inspections and its optimization. International Journal of Systems Science 43 (9):1650–5. doi:10.1080/00207721.2010.549586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L., and M. Xie. 2001. Availability analysis of periodically inspected systems with random walk model. Journal of Applied Probability 38 (4):860–71. doi:10.1239/jap/1011994177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, L., X. Zhao, J. Shen, and Y. Xu. 2010. An availability model for storage products under periodical inspections. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 17 (02):89–103. doi:10.1142/S0218539310003688.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. P., and M. K. Sharma. 1993. Reliability and MTTF evaluation of a two duplex-unit standby system with two types of repair. Microelectronics Reliability 33 (3):291–5. doi:10.1016/0026-2714(93)90014-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, X., L. Wang, and C. Wei. 2014. Reliability research of dependent failure systems using copula. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 43 (8):1838–51. doi:10.1080/03610918.2013.800879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khati, A., and S. B. Singh. 2021. Reliability assessment of replaceable shuffle-exchange network by using interval-valued universal generating function. In The handbook of reliability, maintenance, and system safety through mathematical modeling, ed. A. Kumar and M. Ram, 419–55. United Kingdom: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-819582-6.00011-3.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, D., and S. B. Singh. 2016. Stochastic analysis of complex repairable system with deliberate failure emphasizing reboot delay. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 45 (2):583–602. doi:10.1080/03610918.2013.867993.
   Google Scholar
• Levitin, G., T. Zhang, and M. Xie. 2006. State probability of a series-parallel repairable system with two-types of failure modes. International Journal of Systems Science 37 (14):1011–20. doi:10.1080/00207720600903201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, B., M. Xie, Z. Xu, and W. Kuo. 2016. An imperfect maintenance policy for mission-oriented systems subject to degradation and external shocks. Computers & Industrial Engineering 102:21–32. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant, H., and S. B. Singh. 2021a. Markov process approach for analyzing periodically inspected competing-risk system embodying downtime threshold. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 19 (1):19–34. doi:10.1080/16843703.2021.1972516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant, H., and S. B. Singh. 2021b. Modeling periodically inspected k/r-out-of-n system. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 51 (3):1–15. doi:10.1080/03610926.2021.1982982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant, H., and S. B. Singh. 2022. Modeling systems with revealing and non-revealing failures undergoing periodic inspection. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation :1–14. doi:10.1080/03610918.2022.2070215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q., L. Cui, and H. Gao. 2017. Availability and maintenance modelling for systems subject to multiple failure modes. Computers & Industrial Engineering 108:192–8. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Q., L. Cui, and J. Shen. 2019. Availability analysis and maintenance modelling for inspected Markov systems with down time threshold. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 16 (4):478–95. doi:10.1080/16843703.2018.1465228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelsen, R. B. 2006. An introduction to copulas. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ram, M., and S. B. Singh. 2008. Availability and cost analysis of a parallel redundant complex system with two types of failure under preemptive-resume repair discipline using Gumbel-Hougaard family copula in repair. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 15 (04):341–65. doi:10.1142/S021853930800309X.
   Google Scholar
• Ram, M., and S. B. Singh. 2010. Analysis of a complex system with common cause failure and two types of repair facilities with different distributions in failure. International Journal of Reliability and Safety 4 (4):381–92. doi:10.1504/IJRS.2010.035576.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M. 1989. Introduction to probability models. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, L., S. Si, and Z. Cai. 2016. Optimal maintenance–replacement policy of products with competing failures after expiry of the warranty. Computers & Industrial Engineering 98:68–77. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghipour, S., and D. Banjevic. 2012. Optimum inspection interval for a system under periodic and opportunistic inspections. IIE Transactions 44 (11):932–48. doi:10.1080/0740817X.2011.618176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., and W. Hu. 2008. Availability optimisation of repairable system with preventive maintenance policy. International Journal of Systems Science 39 (6):655–64. doi:10.1080/00207720701872057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., T. Gang, and Y. Zhao. 2013. Availability of a periodically inspected system maintained through several minimal repairs before a replacement or a perfect repair. Abstract and Applied Analysis 2013:1–6. doi:10.1155/2013/741275.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Y. Zhao, R. Peng, and X. Ma. 2018. Hybrid preventive maintenance of competing failures under random environment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 174:130–40. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z., L. Cui, and A. G. Hawkes. 2006. A study on a single-unit Markov repairable system with repair time omission. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 55 (2):182–8. doi:10.1109/TR.2006.874933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z., W. Zhou, Y. Zheng, and Y. Wu. 2016. Optimal maintenance policy for a system with preventive repair and two types of failures. Computers & Industrial Engineering 98:102–12. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2016.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., M. Fouladirad, and C. Berenguer. 2016. A multi-level maintenance policy for a multi-component and multi-failure mode system with two independent failure modes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 153:50–63. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar