Bayesian Robustness of the Positive False Discovery Rate

References

• Benjamini , Y. , Hochberg , Y. ( 1995 ). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing . J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57 : 289 – 300 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini , Y. , Hochberg , Y. ( 2000 ). On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics . J. Education. Behav. Statist. 25 : 60 – 83 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini , Y. , Yekutieli , D. ( 2001 ). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency . Ann. Statist. 29 : 1165 – 1188 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger , J. O. , Berliner , L. M. ( 1986 ). Robust Bayesian and empirical Bayes analysis with ε-contaminated priors . Ann. Statist. 14 : 461 – 486 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Horra , J. , Fernández , C. ( 1994 ). Bayesian analysis under ε-contaminated priors: a trade-off between robustness and precision . J. Statist. Plann. Infer. 38 : 13 – 30 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Horra , J. , Rodríguez-Bernal , M. T. ( 2003 ). Bayesian robustness of the posterior predictive p-value . Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 32 : 1493 – 1503 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber , P. J. ( 1973 ). The use of Choquet capacities in statistics . Bull. Int. Statist. Instit. 45 : 181 – 191 .
   Google Scholar
• Sivaganesan , S. ( 1988 ). Range of posterior measures for priors with arbitrary contaminations . Commun. Statist. Theor. Meth. 17 : 1591 – 1612 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey , J. D. ( 2002 ). A direct approach to false discovery rates . J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 64 : 479 – 498 .
   Google Scholar
• Storey , J. D. (2003). The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann. Statist. 31:2013–2035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey , J. D. , Taylor , J. E. , Siegmund , D. ( 2004 ). Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach . J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 66 : 187 – 205 .
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman , L. ( 1989 ). A robust Bayesian interpretation of likelihood regions . Ann. Statist. 17 : 1387 – 1393 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar