An extension of Franklin's randomized response technique for multi-proportions

References

• Abdelfatah, S., Mazloum, R. (2014). Improved randomized response models using three decks of cards. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 9(1):63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Barabesi, L. (2008). A design-based randomized response procedure for the estimation of population proportion and sensitivity level. J. Stat. Plan Inference 138:2398–2408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabesi, L., Franceschi, S., Marcheselli, M. (2011). A randomized response procedure for multiple-sensitive questions. Stat. Papers 53(3):703–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabesi, L., Marcheselli, M. (2006). A practical implementation and Bayesian estimation in Franklin's randomized response procedure. Commun. Stat. – Simul. Comput. 35:563–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabesi, L., Marcheselli, M. (2010). Bayesian estimation of proportion and sensitivity level in randomized response procedures. Metrika. 72:75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabesi, L., Diana, G., Perri, P.F. (2014). Horvitz-Thompson estimator with randomized response and nonresponse. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 9(1):3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, A. (2001). Using randomized response from a complex survey to estimate a sensitive proportion in a dichotomous finite population. J. Stat. Plan Inference 94:37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana, G., Perri, P.F. (2009). Estimating a sensitive proportion through randomized response procedures based on auxiliary information. Stat. Papers 50:661–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana, G., Perri, P.F. (2011). A class of estimators for quantitative sensitive data. Stat. Papers 52:633–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, L.A. (1989a). Randomized response sampling from dichotomous population with continuous randomization. Survey Methodol. 15:225–235.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, L.A. (1989b). A comparison of estimators for randomized response sampling with continuous distributions from a dichotomous population. Commun. Stat. – Thoery Meth. 18:489–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjestvang, C.R., Singh, S. (2007). Forced quantitative randomized response model: a new device. Metrika. 66:243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, B.G., Abul-Ela, A-LA., Simmons, W.R., Horvitz, D.G. (1969). The unrelated question randomized response model: theoretical framework. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64:520–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed, M., Grewal, I.S. (2005–2006). On the relative efficiencies of randomized response devices with Greenberg unrelated question model. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 1(4):291–297.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, K.H., Lee, G.S., Son, C.K., Kim, J.M. (2014). An estimation of a sensitive attribute by two stage stratified randomized response model. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 9(1):25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Cheon-Sig, Sedory, S.A., Singh, S. (2013a). Simulated minimum sample sizes for various randomized response models. Commun. Stat. – Simul. Comput. 42(4):771–789.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Cheon-Sig, Sedory, S.A., Singh, S. (2013b). Estimating at least seven measures for qualitative variables using randomized response sampling. Stat. Probab. Lett. 83:399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lensvelt-Mulders, G.J.L.M., Hox, J.J., Van der Heijden, P.G.M., Maas, C.J.M. (2005). Meta-analysis of randomized response research, thirty-five years of validation. Sociol. Method Res. 33:319–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan, P.K. (2005). Optimum stratification for scrambled response with ratio and regression methods of estimation. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 1(1):17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mangat, N.S. (1992). Two stage randomized response sampling procedure using unrelated question. J. Indian Soc. Agric. Stat. 44:82–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mangat, N.S., Singh, R., Singh, S. (1992). An improved unrelated question randomized response strategy. Calc. Stat. Ass. Bull. 42:277–281.
   Google Scholar
• Mangat, N.S., Singh, S., Singh, R. (1993). On the use of a modified randomization device in randomized response inquiries. Metron. 51:211–216.
   Google Scholar
• Marcheselli, M., Barabesi, L. (2006). A generalization of Huang's randomized response procedure for the estimation of population proportion and sensitivity level. Metron. 64:145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Quatember, A. (2009). A standardization of randomized response strategies. Surv. Methodol. 35:143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quatember, A. (2012). An extension of the standardized response technique to a multi-stage set up. Stat. Methods Appl. 21(4):475–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quatember, A. (2014). A randomized response design for a polychotomous sensitive population and its application to opinion polls. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 9(1):11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, J.-B., Kim, J.-M., Heo, T.-Y., Park, C.G. (2005). On stratified randomized response sampling. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 1(1):31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sidhu, S.S., Bansal, M.L., Singh, S. (2007). Estimation of sensitive multi-characters using unknown value of unrelated question. Appl. Math. Sci. 1(37):1803–1820.
   Google Scholar
• Sidhu, S.S., Grewal, I.S., Javed, M. (2014). On estimation of totals of multi-sensitive-characteristics using forced quantitative randomized responses. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 9(1):89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, H.P., Tarray, T.A. (2014a). Al alternative to stratified Kim and Warde's randomized response model using optimal (Neyman) allocation. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 9(1):37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, H.P., Tarray, T.A. (2014b). An improved mixed randomized response model. Model Assisted Stat. Appl. 9(1):73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Kim, J.-M., Grewal, I.S. (2008). imputing and jackknifing scrambled responses. Metron-Int. J. Stat. LXVI(2):183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R., Singh, S., Mangat, N.S., Tracy, D.S. (1995). An improved two stage randomized response strategy. Stat. Papers 36:265–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Horn, S., Singh, R., Mangat, N.S. (2003). On the use of modified randomization device for estimating the prevalence of a sensitive attribute. Stat. Trans. 6:515–522.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Sedory, S.A. (2011). Cramer-Rao lower bound of variance in randomized response sampling. Sociol. Methods Res. 40(3):536–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Sedory, S.A. (2013). A new randomized response device for sensitive characteristics: An application of the negative hyper geometric distribution. Metron. 71:3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, S.L. (1965). Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60:63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar